After a 2022 decision to overturn the longstanding right to abortion, Jewish women’s groups unite in protesting laws reflecting a Christian-centric view of when life begins
ed note–as usual, LOTS of important protocols that every Gentile with a vested interest in his/her own survival needs to understand about all of this–what it was, what it is, and what it WILL BE.
Firsto–
Yes, it’s true that we here at this humble little informational endeavor spend a lot of time/energy discussing the issue of legalized child murder otherwise known as abortion on demand. And yes, the argument can be made that this is due to what was our Catholic upbringing, but–as the reader can easily deduce for him/herself in spending some time reading many of the other new stories and accompanying ed note commentaries appearing herein–the interests/motivations driving our efforts are much larger than simply the issue of RvW, as important as that is nevertheless.
Having said that, we invite the Gentile reader to consider the following ‘what if’ scenario–
Imagine an invading army hailing from some faraway land, and not driven by the usual appetites that usually initiate wars, i.e. resources, land, water, food, wealth, etc, but rather driven by a backwards ‘jihadist’ religious mindset bent upon the total destruction of a nation because this is what the deity which the invading army happens to follow commands be done.
The invaders march across the borders of the USA, they are well-trained, well-resourced, well-equipped, HIGHLY-ORGANIZED, and very much devoted to the COMPLETE conquest/subjugation of this nation using the most violent, vicious, pitiless and vindictive methods ever hatched in the mind of Lucifer.
Sort of like, well, what has been done to the Palestinians, Iraqis, Libyans, Syrians, Afghans, etc, but we digress…
Imagine that the death toll arising from the actions of this ‘army’ and of its 50-year occupation numbers between 70 and 100 million Americans who lost their lives–quite painfully, we might add–via the ‘procedures’ of either dismemberment, disembowelment or being burned to death, and–what’s worse–that this bloody occupation was only made possible by traitors within the political/security establishment who opened the gates to these invaders and throughout the entirety of this 50-year rampage, gave them aid and comfort in doing so, using the existing political system to bind the hands of the states and the populace who might otherwise rise up against this ‘existential threat’ and deal with it in the only manner which is both moral and appropriate.
In a nutshell, we have just described what has been the war against American children since the infamous Roe Vs. Wade decision.
This holocaust was not accomplished in the ‘conventional’ manner with tanks, fighter jets, or by BDU-clad combat troops marching in unison, but rather via a ‘juhadist’ army operating within the courts, the political system–at both the federal and state level–as well as the various pundits, polemicists and propagandists whose job was/is to intoxicate the collective American consciousness in surrendering to this invasion/conquest/occupation.
And yes, ladies and Gentile-men, this was a ‘religious’ war from the very beginning, and those responsible for waging this war and all the attending murder and bloodshed were indeed terrorists from the Middle East, not ‘jihadists’, the term popularized in the aftermath of Israel’s terrorist attacks on 9/11, but rather ‘Jew-hadists’ out to impose the ‘protocols’ of their backwards and violent religious beliefs on the rest of the world.
Now, it is a codified ‘canon’ of sorts within certain ‘circles’ involved in debate/discussion surrounding the ‘JQ’ that the organized forces of anti-Gentilism (otherwise referred to here on this humble little informational endeavor as ‘Judea, Inc’) who are so much front-and-center of the pro-child murder movement these days do so ONLY because they have ‘abandoned’ the ‘holy’ teachings of their Judah-ism.
However, as anyone who has been paying attention since the ‘fall’ of RvW and the TIDAL WAVE of Judaic protest, screeching and–more importantly–LEGAL ACTION that has erupted since that time should have noticed for him/herself is the fact that the pro-child murder forces within virtually ALL organized Jewish groups in America–left, right and middle–justify their position based upon the teachings of their Jewish religion, citing specifically the book of Exodus that does indeed make KRISTOL CLEAR the position that a yet-to-be-born child is less than human and therefore, snuffing out its life is not murder and punishable ONLY if the father of that dead child demands some monetary compensation for having his seed wiped out.
Now, we aren’t talking about just a few low-exposure articles or news stories highlighting this fact, i.e. the religiously-girded support for institutionalized child murder on the part of the followers of Judah-ism.
Since BEFORE and in the aftermath of the ‘fall’ of RvW, hundreds of news stories have appeared on the front pages of every major media outlet in America featuring the manner in which the followers of Judah-ism are speaking in one voice over the fact that their ‘freedom of religion’ is being attacked.
And the truth is, despite their infamous penchant for lying, dishonesty and duplicity in 11 out of 10 cases, in this instance however, they are telling the truth.
Judah-ism, going all the way back to the VERY BEGINNING of the scriptural affair–specifically the book of Exodus–was/is the philosophical platform from which the entire business of legalized abortion in America was launched, and, more ominously, the platform from which it will be ‘raised from the dead’, no pun intended.
As the reader will see below in the following news story, ‘they’ are already hard at work, just as they were in the pre-RvW days, agitating in the public forums and–more importantly–in the COURTS.
Already, several state judges have struck down or else issued injunctions against enforcement of laws meant to protect innocent human life in the womb within those states where these laws have been passed, and again, based upon the court’s decision that these laws infringe upon the Jews’ civil rights and in particular their ‘freedom of religion’.
Rest assured as well that once ‘they’ have racked up enough wins in the various state courts and have garnered enough forward momentum, this ‘freedom of religion’ argument will be returning to the SCOTUS where indeed it is likely to pass Constitutional muster, because, as the words themselves make Kristol Clear in the various texts of the religion to which the Jews adhere, a yet-to-be-born child is not a human being, and therefore, taking his/her life is not murder.
But it doesn’t end there ladies and Gentile-men…
The ‘freedom of religion’ clause which THEY WILL utilize with great success in resurrecting the grisly business of legalized child murder also applies to other abominable practices permitted within that same ‘religion’ that they follow, that being the use of children for sexual pleasure/purposes, to wit–
‘So now, kill all the boys, as well as every woman who has had relations with a man, but spare for yourselves every little girl who has never had relations with a man…’
Again, as in the case involving the permitted killing of yet-to-be-born children found within the Book of Exodus, this particular passage instructing the Israelites to ‘keep alive for themselves’ those little girls who have ‘never had relations’ with a man comes from the very bedrock of Judah-ism itself, the Torah (Old Testament) specifically within the Book of Numbers.
This admonition/dispensation for the Israelites to ‘keep alive for themselves’ these virgin children was later expanded upon in various religious decisions and accompanying texts within the Talmud that specified that sex with little girls could be performed with those less than 3 years old, to wit–
Which means, ladies and Gentile-men, that the next chapter of this real-deal/real-time/real-life horror story/living nightmare involving the organized forces of anti-Gentilism is about to throw open the floodgates to all sorts of new ‘freedoms’ and ‘rights’–including the LEGALIZED SEXUAL EXPLOITATION of children, and again, based upon the same argument with which RvW will be re-instituted–
‘Freedom of religion’.
To that end therefore, (and our sincerest apologies ahead of time to the reader’s sensibilities over what they are about to see) do we understand better exactly WHY we have Hollywood creatures such as this–
And this–
And this–
And this–
And this–
And THESE?
–And all of them taking their ‘marching orders’ from guys like these–
…And whose job is to ‘role model’ and ‘groom’ children into seeing themselves as ‘sexual beings’ who are being ‘oppressed’ by a ‘Christian-centric view’ of when a child’s ‘sexual life’ begins and who–as the legal argument is sure to materialize–possess the ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to engage in whatever species of sexualized behavior they desire, from gender-mutilation to becoming porn stars before they have even hit puberty?
We already have it as an established FACT that minors are permitted to get abortions–an invasive surgical procedure that can lead to death–without the permission of their parents, and so why is it such a stretch to imagine that in time, these same minors will have the legal right to defiantly shout ‘MY BODY, MY CHOICE’ and thus exercise that ‘freedom of choice’ in deciding to become porn stars at the ripe old age of 13?
And God help any parent who stands in the way of these minors making such a choice, as these same parents will be deemed ‘unfit’ and ‘abusive’ and will thus lose custody over their own children, courtesy of the Sin-a-gog of Satan.
Yes, ladies and Gentile-men, just like that ‘invading army’ hypothesized at the beginning of this extensive ed note commentary, this is precisely what ‘they’–the children of Israel–are planning to inflict through court decisions upon this nation, just as they did a half century ago with the moral abomination known as RvW, and at the end of it all, after the children have been thoroughly destroyed (half of them in the wombs of their mothers via the abortionists’ sacrificial knife and the other half being used as sex slaves just as the Book of Numbers commands) amidst all the wailing and gnashing of teeth that will take place on the part of a conquered and defeated American populace, the one discussion that will not be taking place is the manner by which all of this was as visible as an approaching hurricane if people had just bothered to pay attention.
Times of Israel
When Elly got pregnant with her second child, her husband Arkady painted a series of seeds and fruits to show the growth of the fetus — a poppy seed, a blueberry, an artichoke. Then at 17 weeks they decided to end the pregnancy.
‘What made us comfortable with terminating the pregnancy is that I was raised to believe that life doesn’t begin until a fetus is born, and that is very much rooted in my Jewish identity and in Jewish law,’ Elly, whose last name is withheld, says in the opening scenes of Paula Eiselt’s new documentary, ‘Under G-d.’
January 22 marks what would have been the 50th anniversary of the landmark US Supreme Court ruling in the Roe v. Wade case that legalized a woman’s right to abortion. In the wake of the recent June 24, 2022, Dobbs decision which overturned Roe v. Wade, American Jews are again fighting for reproductive rights and increasingly turning to freedom of religion as their basis.
‘Under G-d,’ which recently screened at the Sundance Film Festival, explores how many people of faith don’t conceive of abortion under the same rubric as do their Christian neighbors. It also channels these religious minorities’ feelings of powerlessness in expressing their convictions against the Christian political majority into a work of political and social activism.
‘Like everyone else, I was grieving when the Dobbs decision came, but as an artist I had to put my feelings into action,’ Eiselt said. ‘I wanted to show there was something we can do to fight back. The film shows how we can flip the script on religious freedom, which has so far been used by the courts to protect fundamentalist Christianity.’
‘As Jews, we know what happens when there is no line between church and state, and so we are leading the fight against this and our interfaith brothers and sisters are joining us,’ Eiselt said.
For decades, Roman Catholic and Evangelical Christian interpretations of when life begins have dominated the discourse about abortion rights and reproductive freedom, said Daphne Lazar Price, executive director of the Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance (JOFA). Those interpretations have become law, threatening Jews’ free exercise of religious beliefs.
‘I think there is a message that other religions don’t count,’ Price said.
‘As a matter of principle, JOFA supports every woman’s legal right to make decisions about, and have control over, her own body, without the involvement of the government or any other entity. Every woman should have the right to make her own decisions about religious and medical matters, including abortion, free from stigma and while retaining human dignity,’ she added.
According to most interpretations of Jewish law, life begins only at birth — before that, the mother’s physical and emotional well-being takes priority. Thus, if and when a mother’s life or her happiness is at stake, abortion is not only allowed but required.
‘Pro-Life Christians are religious extremists like the Taliban’
As Zonneveld sees it, the Dobbs decision shows there is no true freedom of religion in the United States when it comes to protecting reproductive health.
‘It’s a particular kind of Christianity. I’ve been saying this for years — it’s equivalent to other religious extremists like the Taliban. There is no difference. We are now a theocracy,’ she said.
Pushing back against these restrictions requires grassroots efforts, Zonneveld said. To that end, MPV engages in educational outreach. It has also worked with Muslim and non-Muslim physicians who are trying to fight back against abortion restrictions in Ohio.
In the courts we trust
According to a March 2022 Institute for Social Policy and Understanding survey, at least 80% of Jews support abortion in most cases, said Michal Raucher, professor of Jewish studies at Rutgers University, in the documentary ‘Under G-d.’
After the Dobbs decision a slew of lawsuits were filed, each one arguing that Roe’s repeal is an assault on religious freedom.
On January 19, Jewish clergy filed a lawsuit challenging Missouri’s abortion bans as unconstitutionally imposing one narrow religious doctrine on all Missouri residents.
Put another way, ‘it’s religion protecting itself from government intervention,’ said Rachel Laser, president and CEO at Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
‘That these Jewish clergy came together to advocate for freedom of religion — that’s America, that’s Missouri at her best. Reproductive freedom is religious freedom,’ Laser, who is Jewish, added.
Reproductive freedom is religious freedom
The suit argues that Gov. Michael Parson and the Missouri legislature violated the state constitution by enshrining their personal religious beliefs about abortion into law. According to the lawsuit, legislators openly and repeatedly emphasize they were writing their religious beliefs into the bans, even declaring in the bill itself that ‘Almighty God is the author of life.’
In Kentucky, the lawsuit Daniel Cameron v. EMW Women’s Surgical Center, P.S.C. et al., contends that the state’s definition of when life begins doesn’t square with Jewish law.
The National Council of Jewish Women (NCJW) coordinated and submitted an amicus brief in that case.
The brief argues that Jewish religious traditions don’t share the same view of when life begins; that religious traditions affirm moral rights to decide whether and when to end a pregnancy; and lastly, that religious traditions affirm the importance of reproductive choice for pregnant people in marginalized communities.
‘As important as the lawsuits and briefs are, they are also Band-Aids,’ said NCJW CEO Sheila Katz.
To that end, NCJW rallied with a half dozen interfaith clergy on January 18 in front of the Supreme Court.
‘We need a long-term solution that involves rebuilding a fair judiciary. We need to organize and mobilize — Jews, Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs,’ Katz said.
Building grassroots, one case at a time
In Indiana, a group of Jewish women sued, saying the state’s law infringes on religious freedom. Marion County Superior Court Judge Heather Welch issued a primary injunction against the ban, saying the law ‘substantially burdens the religious exercise of the Plaintiffs.’
Although MPV didn’t sign onto the recent amicus briefs, it has done so in the past. It was part of a coalition of left-of-center religious groups that filed an amicus brief in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals relating to the Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt case, which concerned the disposal of fetal tissue after an abortion or loss of a pregnancy.
‘These sorts of lawsuits are not long shots,’ said Michael Helfand, professor at Pepperdine University’s Caruso School of law.
He explained that if under the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court ruled it’s unconstitutional for abortion restrictions not to include a medical exception, then it would also have to rule it’s unconstitutional not to include a religious exception.