Controversial new research suggests SARS-CoV-2 bears signs of ‘genetic engineering’

ed note–as the readers of this website know, we here at this humble little informational endeavor apply a more ‘reality-based’ perspectus to all the dramatic events taking place today, and particularly when it comes to being ‘hopeful’ about the ‘tide turning’ sometime soon and the ‘white hats’ saving the day.

Our position is simply–‘it ain’t gonna happen’, (please pardon the bad grammar) at least not absent either some APOCALYPTIC disaster, a MIRACLE, or a combination of both.

It’s true that the ‘right-wing’ is somewhat smarter than they were 6 years ago when a certain DJT took office. They have acquired/learned/added new words to their political vocabulary that they didn’t have before such as ‘woke’ and ‘cancel culture’…They are becoming more ‘bold’ and ‘fearless’ and ‘avant-garde’ by sporting around town in public wearing their ‘Trump 2024’ baseball hats and by plastering bumper stickers on their cars/trucks reading ‘LET’S GO BRANDON’.

They’ll even go so far as to say that Covid was probably cooked up in a lab, but when asked WHICH lab, will reflexively/autonomically say ‘Wuhan’ in China, without considering for a moment that maybe it was cooked up somewhere else and brought to Wuhan, no different than the narrative surrounding 9/11 being done by ‘AY-rab’ terrorists rather than someone else with a specific agenda.

In short, they are the equivalent of a family that has woken up at 3 am and found the house nearly burned down around them to its concrete foundation, a tragedy compounded by the fact that before they went to bed that night, the smoke alarms were going off warning that there was a fire somewhere in the house but which they simply ignored.

Now, as it all relates to the story below…

The news piece deals specifically with SARS Covid 2 being cooked up in a lab, or rather, ‘kooked’ up in what we might call a ‘kosher kitchen’.

SARS-COVID2 WAS 20 YEARS AGO, which means that if there is credible proof (as this piece from the Economist states) that it was ‘engineered’ in a lab and that Covid 19 derived from it, (the same Covid 19 that has upended the world in an UNPRECEDENTED manner) that all the tumult and turmoil that the world has seen in the last 2 years was already a ‘done deal’ 20 years ago as far as the ‘engineers’ are concerned.

Meaning, they are 20 years (at a MINIMUM) ahead of the rest of us in terms of what kind of bombs they intend to throw into our camp, and if the present muted/deficient/uninterested ‘reaction’ to all of the tumult and turmoil of the last 2 years is any indication of what we can all expect to take place in the near future, then years from now, after the next bombs go off, we will still be talking about those future tragedies in the most elementary, one-dimensional ‘analysis’, speculation and curiosity while the ‘perpe-traitors’ of those crimes go undetected, unindicted and unpunished.

Now, to be fair to the average Gentile whose cultural and political ‘house’ has been just about burned to the ground by the eternal menace, it’s not that he/she CAN’T understand the depth/severity of the danger which he/she faces, but rather, because rather than ‘dig deep’ on his/her own and pursue what is now ‘forbidden knowledge’, he/she chooses instead to submit him/herself as a ‘student’ to ‘professors’ such as these–

–And others whose daily ‘lecture’ on politics is deliberately throttled down to the lowest common denominator and who WOULDN’T DARE ‘crack open the books’ on that history involving the long list of Israel’s dirty tricks against America, and moreso, why out of all the various ‘fiends posing as friends’ who might have ‘engineered’ Covid, the one with the best motive for doing so was a ‘state’ who–





–Was out to destroy the presidency of one DJT in order to abort in utero his ‘Deal of the Century’–



The same ‘Deal of the Century’ that would have seen the creation of a ‘Palestinian State’ which this guy–


–MILITANTLY opposes with 666% of his Luciferian DNA…

After all, such speculation about the Jewish state kooking up covid, or, if you will–KOVID–isn’t without a great deal of merit…

Besides the fact that the established history of the previous ‘house fire’–meaning 9/11–featured a group of Mossad agents filming/cheering the destruction and who later admitted on Israeli TV that they were sent to ‘document the event’, as well, we have it from none other than former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky that Israel has LONG been in the ‘business’ of ‘kooking’ up ‘doomsday’ biological weapons, to wit–

It was Uri who enlightened me regarding the Nes Ziyyona facility. It was, he said, ‘an ABC warfare laboratory – ABC standing for atomic, bacteriological, and chemical. It was where our top epidemiological scientists were developing various doomsday machines. Palestinians infiltrators came in handy in this regard. As human guinea pigs, they could make sure the weapons the scientists were developing worked properly and could verify how fast they worked and make them even more efficient…’

‘Years later, I met Uri again. He had just come back from an assignment in South Africa. I was helping him prepare for a large shipment of medication to South Africa to accompany several Israeli doctors who were headed there for some ‘humanitarian work’ in Soweto, a black township outside Johannesburg. The doctors were to assist in treating patients at an outpatient clinic for the Baragwanath hospital in Soweto, a few blocks away from the houses of Winnie Mandela and Bishop Desmond Tutu. The hospital and the clinic were supported by a hospital in Baltimore, which served as a cut-out for the Mossad…’

‘What is the Mossad doing giving humanitarian assistance to blacks in Soweto?’ I remember asking him. There was no logic to it; no short-term political gain (which was the way the Mossad operated) or any visible monetary advantage.’

‘Do you remember Nes Ziyyona?’ His question sent shivers up my spine. I nodded.

‘This is very much the same. We’re testing both new infectious diseases and new medication that can’t be tested on humans in Israel for several of the Israeli medicine manufacturers. This will tell them whether they’re on the right track, saving them millions in research.’

And in bringing this thing ‘full circle’ as our good friend Mike Piper used to say, one will find after doing an internet search that of all the thousands–HUNDREDS of thousands of websites in fact–dedicated to discussing politics and current events, that there is one–


…lone site that discusses at least the POSSIBILITY of ‘Kovid’ 19 being a political ‘doomsday machine’ that was ‘KKK’–meaning ‘Kooked’ up in a Kosher Kitchen known as ‘Nes Ziyyona’ in Israel, while everyone else remains ‘scurrying around like drugged cockroaches’ (as one Mossad goombah quipped years ago) busying themselves with talking about vaccines, masks, mandates, etc…

In short, ladies and Gentile-men, the ugly truth concerning the ‘Great Gentile Renaissance’ which many are expecting/awaiting to see erupt at any minute now when DJT comes riding into town on a white horse and into the White House, and again, please pardon the bad grammar–

…ain’t gonna happen.


The Economist

A string of about 30,000 genetic letters were all that it took to start the nightmare of covid-19, the death toll from which is likely to be more than 20m.

Exactly how this story began has been hotly contested.

Many think that covid-19’s emergence was a zoonosis—a spillover, as so many new pathogens are, from wild animals, given that it resembles a group of coronaviruses found in bats.

Others have pointed to the enthusiastic coronavirus engineering going on in laboratories around the world, but particularly in Wuhan—the Chinese city where the virus was first identified. In February 2021 a team of scientists assembled by the World Health Organisation (WHO) to visit Wuhan said a laboratory leak was extremely unlikely. However, this conclusion was subsequently challenged by the director of the WHO who said that ruling out this theory was premature.

Two recent publications appear to have bolstered the case for a natural origin connected to a ‘wet market’ in Wuhan. These markets sell live animals, often housed in poor conditions, and are known to be sites where new pathogens jump from animal to human. Early cases of covid-19 clustered around this market.

But critics counter that there is so much missing data about the epidemic’s initial days that this portrait may be inaccurate.

The opposing idea of a leak from a laboratory is not implausible, as the accidental escape of viruses from labs is more common than many people realize. The flu epidemic of 1977 is thought to have started this way. But an escaped virus does not imply an engineered virus. Virology labs are also full of the unengineered sort.

Research such as that done in Wuhan offers a number of ways for a virus to leak out. A researcher on a field trip could have picked it up in the wild and then returned to Wuhan, and so spread it to others there. Or someone might have been infected with a wild-collected virus in the laboratory itself.

But some argue that SARS-cov-2 could have been assembled in a laboratory from other viruses that were already to hand, and then leaked out, and into this fray comes an analysis from an unlikely source.

Alex Washburne is a mathematical biologist who runs Selva, a small startup in microbiome science based in New York. He is an outsider, although he has worked in the past on virological modeling as a researcher at Montana State University.

For this study, Dr. Washburne collaborated with two other scientists, Antonius VanDongen, an associate professor of pharmacology at Duke University, in North Carolina, and Valentin Bruttel, a molecular immunologist at the University of Würzburg, Germany.

Both Dr. Washburne and Dr. VanDongen have been active proponents of an investigation into the lab-leak theory.

The trio base their claim on a novel method of detecting plausibly lab-engineered viruses.

Their analysis, published on October 20th on bioRxiv, a preprint server, suggests sars-cov-2 has some genomic features that they say points in the direction of the virus having been stitched together by some form of genetic engineering.

By examining how many of these putative stitching sites sars-cov-2 has, and how relatively short these pieces are, they are able to assess how much the virus resembles others found in nature.

They start from the presumption that creating a genome as long as that of sars-cov-2 would mean combining shorter fragments of existing viruses together. For a coronavirus genome assembly they say an ideal arrangement would be to use between five and eight fragments, all under 8,000 letters long. Such fragments are created using restriction enzymes. These are molecular scissors that cut genomic material at particular sequences of genetic letters. If a genome does not have such restriction sites in opportune places, researchers typically create new ones of their own.

They argue that the distribution of restriction sites for two popular restriction enzymes—BsaI and BsmBI—are ‘anomalous’ in the sars-cov-2 genome, and the length of the longest fragment is far shorter than would be expected. They determined this by taking 70 disparate coronavirus genomes (not including sars-cov-2) and cutting them into pieces with 214 commonly used restriction enzymes.

From the resulting collection, they were able to work out the expected lengths of fragments when coronaviruses are cut into varying numbers of pieces.

Early reactions to these findings have been deeply divided.

Francois Balloux, a professor of computational systems biology at University College London, said he found the results intriguing. ‘Contrary to many of my colleagues, I couldn’t identify any fatal flaw in the reasoning and methodology. The distribution of BsaI/BsmBI restriction sites in sars-cov-2 is atypical’.

Sylvestre Marillonnet, an expert in synthetic biology at the Leibniz Institute for Plant Biochemistry, in Germany, agreed that the number and distribution of these restriction sites did not appear random, and that the number of silent mutations found in these sites did suggest that sars-cov-2 could have been engineered.

Previous arguments in support of the possibility of a lab leak have stressed that a manipulated virus would not need to have any such tell-tale signs.

However, Justin Kinney, a professor at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York, said that researchers have created coronaviruses before and said the genetic signature of sars-cov-2 indicates a virus ready for further experiments and said the thesis of it being engineered in a lab needed to be taken seriously.

Any conclusion that sars-cov-2 was engineered will of course be hotly contested. China denies the virus came from a Chinese lab, and has asked for investigations into whether it may have originated in America or elsewhere.

Dr. Washburne and his colleagues say their predictions are testable. If a progenitor genome to sars-cov-2 is found in the wild with restriction sites that are the same, or intermediate, it would raise the chances that this pattern evolved by chance.

Any widely supported conclusion that the virus was genetically engineered would have profound ramifications, both political and scientific. It would put in a new light the behavior of the Chinese government in the early days of the outbreak, particularly its reluctance to share epidemiological data from those days. It would also raise questions about what was known, when, and by whom about the presumably accidental escape of an engineered virus.

For now however, this is a first-draft of science, and needs to be treated as such. But the scrutineers are already at work.