ed note–an older article but one which–especially now with what is 20/20 hindsight–makes Kristol Clear exactly the nature of what was going on back then, and what is going on right now.

The first ‘protocol’ that must be employed here is the ‘caveat emptor,’ or ‘buyer beware’ that should/must attend any and ALL exposure to anything coming out of Judaica’s misinformation/disinformation system, given that to some degree, it is laced with poison designed to confuse and consternate the Gentile mind.

In this case, our deranged and deceptive Hebrew-ish writer begins his magic spell by downplaying the ‘Jewishness’ of the Neo-Conservative cabal in the Bush White House who orchestrated the destruction of Iraq by saying that despite their ‘Jewish surnames’, they were not in ‘decision-making positions’ like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc, and therefore there is no ‘Jewish’ angle to what took place.

Prima facie evidence of ‘how they do it’.

The follower of Judah-ism is by the very definition of his/her status as one of the ‘children of Israel’, a born liar, a born thief and a born killer, since these (and other) criminal actions are what Judah-ism commands/demands of its followers, and therefore, anyone who identifies as a follower of this diabolical cult gladly accepts the responsibility in carrying out the above-listed ‘duties’ as a ‘sacramental’ to the deity that this cult worships, yah-way.

BUT THEN, true to the shape-shifting/self-contradicting spiritual/intellectual energy that is the electrical current driving all Hebraic/Judaic thought processes and behavior, he flat out admits that indeed it is the ‘Jewishness’ of these Neo-Conservatives that was the animating force driving their push for Iraq’s annihilation.

Now, we here at this humble little informational endeavor are not going to go down the road of ‘proving’ that the destruction of Iraq was indeed an Israeli operation, as only the pathologically stupid or pathetically blind refuse to see this fact.

Rather, it is those other ‘devils’ in the details contained in this piece that warrant very close and careful study on the part of the 7 billion Gentiles living on God’s green earth who happen to have a vested interest in their own future survival.

Let us begin our little examination–

These Jewish conservatives support the war for their own reasons, and not simply because they are Jewish. Likely without realizing it in most cases however, they are being true to the spiritual heritage of their ancestors in rejecting the squeamishness of the anti-war crowd.

Our Hebrew-ish author continues–

If the word ‘Judaism’ means anything definite — as opposed to anything you want it to mean — then the word needs to be understood within the textual tradition from which our heritage arises. To know what’s authentically Jewish, you have to open the classical works of Jewish faith, starting with the Bible…

So, what our deranged follower of Judah-ism says within the very first paragraphs is that the ‘children of Israel’ base their present-day actions on the ‘traditions’ of their ancestors who were by no means ‘anti-war’, and that the guiding force in all of this is ‘the bible’.

Now, let us be Kristol clear about the fact that when our deranged follower of Judah-ism says ‘the bible’ and talks about his ancestors, he AIN’T talking about the guy featured on the left, but rather the guy–a convicted murderer and insurrectionist–featured on the right, Barabbas, laughing and yucking it up.

Nexto–

When it comes to military conflict, the Hebrew Scriptures couldn’t be less squeamish…

Please pay careful attention to this statement, as well as the follow-ups to it–

Maimonides concludes his greatest work, the ‘Mishneh Torah,’ with a section called ‘Laws of Kings and their Wars.’ In it, the Jewish leader he anticipates isn’t the prime minister of Israel, but the Messiah, so not everything the sage says can be applied practically to the actions of our present-day rulers, whether Jewish or non-Jewish. But the values implicit in the laws are what matters, and they are straight out of the Bible.

Now, this is of vital importance for 2 main reasons–

The ‘mystery’ in explaining/understanding the ‘JQ’ is no mystery at all. The recipe in creating this peculiar pedigree of humanoids has been sitting there as an open secret for thousands of years in what is–year after year–the MOST-read/MOST-sold book in the world, the bible.

The reason this is important is because there is an entire neighborhood of analysts out there whose ‘expert-cy’ is de-coding what makes this particular and peculiar gear in the machinery of humanity function in the manner that it does and whose diagnosis of this problem is this peculiar word that very few understand and about which even fewer have heard known as the ‘Talmud’.

Now, to be sure, this peculiar ‘Talmud’ that very few understand and about which even fewer have ever heard is indeed an ugly and dangerous piece of Judaic literature. Its depiction of Gentiles as ‘beasts on 4 legs’ and as ‘cattle’, as well as the scurrilous depictions of Jesus Christ and His Blessed Mother are the stuff oozing out of a mind darkened by the hand of Lucifer himself.

HOWEVER, what must be understood about all of this is the fact that this peculiar ‘Talmud’ that very few understand and about which even fewer have heard is only an extension, aggregation and MULTIPLICATION of the already-existing evils found within the Torah, or as our deranged Hebrew-ish writer refers to it (again, as part of the typically-Judaic application of duplicity and sleight of hand, in this case, bringing the Christian reader into the argument on his side) as ‘the bible’.

In other words, these various ‘analysts’ whose ‘expert-cy’ lies in their ability to ‘de-code’ what is the dark and dangerous electrical current driving today’s followers of Judah-ism and all the murder and mayhem they instigate on a geo-political level don’t know the difference between s***and shinola and in their mis-diagnosis of the nature of the problem, and in doing so, lead entire swaths of people off the straight and narrow road to the truth and down a primrose path to their own destruction at the hands of people such as the deranged follower of Judah-ism who penned this essay.

 

David Klinghoffer for the Jewish Daily Forward

April 23, 2004

Patrick Buchanan and other like-minded commentators have repeatedly tried to direct the public’s attention to the fact that, in the Iraq conflict, some of the leading pro-war advocates in the conservative movement have Jewish surnames. There’s Wolfowitz, Perle and Feith, not to mention Kristol, Frum and Weinstein. The presumption is that President Bush was led to invade Iraq by ‘neo-conservative’ advisers with an interest mainly in seeing America defeat one of Israel’s enemies.

Once you consider that the actual decision-makers and other key war planners aren’t Jewish at all — Rumsfeld, Rice, Cheney and the president himself — the Buchananite conspiracy theory is easily revealed as the canard that it is.

And yet the Jewishness of the aforementioned pro-war intellectuals isn’t entirely without relevance.

These Jewish conservatives support the war for their own reasons, and not simply because they are Jewish. Likely without realizing it in most cases however, they are being true to the spiritual heritage of their ancestors in rejecting the squeamishness of the anti-war crowd.

If the word ‘Judaism’ means anything definite — as opposed to anything you want it to mean — then the content of the word needs to be understood within the textual tradition from which our heritage arises. To know what’s authentically Jewish, you have to open the classical works of Jewish faith, starting with the Bible.

When it comes to military conflict, the Hebrew Scriptures couldn’t be less squeamish. Begin with the way the Bible defines the role of government — basically, to make war and execute justice.

As told in the books of 1 & 2 Samuel, after centuries of being governed by judges, the Jewish people demand a sovereign ruler, and God gives them one in the person of Saul, anointed by the prophet Samuel.

The people cry, ‘Our king will judge us, and go forth before us, and fight our wars!’ (1 Sam. 8:19).

To be sure, God is displeased with their further demand that, in being ruled by a king, the Children of Israel should then be ‘like all the other nations,’ as Jews are not supposed to be like other peoples. But the nature of kingship, and the centrality of war-making to it, is taken for granted by Samuel, Saul and the Lord Himself.

Later, Jewish law would make this even clearer.

Maimonides concludes his greatest work, the ‘Mishneh Torah,’ with a section called ‘Laws of Kings and their Wars.’ In it, the Jewish leader he anticipates isn’t the prime minister of Israel, but the Messiah, so not everything the sage says can be applied practically to the actions of our present-day rulers, whether Jewish or non-Jewish. But the values implicit in the laws are what matters, and they are straight out of the Bible.

‘The purpose of appointing a king,’ writes Maimonides, ‘is only to execute justice and wage wars.’ Some of the laws of war, Jewish-style, may alarm modern readers.

In fighting a defensive war, the king is granted enormous leniency. He must first offer peace to the enemy, defined as total surrender. But once this has been rejected, the king needs nobody’s permission, not even the United Nations’, to enter into ferocious combat.

When the war is not, strictly speaking, defensive, he consults the legislative branch of government, the Sanhedrin. With their agreement however, he is again free to act with few restraints, provided that all his deeds are for the sake of Heaven. Basing himself on Deuteronomy (20:13), Maimonides has no patience for quibbles about the distinction between combatants and non-combatants. In the Jewish understanding, enemy males may be in or out of uniform: ‘All males past the age of majority should be killed.’

Offense is understood as smart defense. As Maimonides writes, the king may even wage war ‘to expand the borders of Israel or magnify [his] greatness and reputation.’ What’s the defensive value of that?

Protecting your own people may require striking awe into the hearts of those who threaten you. President Bush understands this. It explains a lot about why we made war on Iraq, when that country was not directly responsible for the atrocity that started it all, that of September 11.

Sometimes, a campaign to intimidate enemies — that is, defense achieved through offense — may work by terrifying dangerous bad guys on whom you aren’t even making war. That is, attack Saddam Hussein and you thereby throw a scare into Osama bin Laden.

When, under Samuel’s leadership, the Jews waged a successful campaign against the Philistines, the Bible immediately notes: ‘and there was peace between Israel and the Amorites’ (1 Sam. 7:14) — a totally different foreign aggressor nation, whom the text hasn’t even seen fit to mention till this point. The Amorites saw what Israel did to the Philistines, and decided to make themselves inconspicuous.

Does this mean the Jewish neoconservatives are right to advocate the continuing pursuit of warfare in Iraq, till that nation is rebuilt as a democracy? Not necessarily. I could be reading these Biblical and other sources all wrong, but I doubt it. Or the Bible, which Christians like the president — no less than Jews — have found to be a repository of ancient and tested wisdom, could be wrong. But I doubt that too.

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading