ed note–a few important ‘protocols’ that all Gentiles with a vested interest in their own future survival need to consider on this one.
First and foremost is the following–
As much as there will be the inevitable rush to the podium on the part of various disinfo/misinfo agents, some of them acting deliberately and others just too blinded by their own delusional love of the Old Testament to see the damage they are doing–who will assert with all dogmatic authority possible that the Hebrew/Israelite/Judah-ite featured in this story is only engaging in this behavior because he has abandoned his ‘holy’ Judah-ism and his ‘holy’ Torah (Old Testament) in favor of an agnostic/atheistic/hedonistic lifestyle.
Nothing could be further from the truth, ladies and Gentile-men. He is every bit as much ‘Jewish’ as his Hebraic/Israelite/Judah-ite forebearers going all the way back to Abraham as recounted in the book of Genesis, or, perhaps better stated, ‘Jenesis’…
As the Torah (Old Testament) makes KRISTOL CLEAR, it was none other than Abraham himself, the ‘grand poobah’ that got the whole mess started that is about to ‘blossom’ into Armageddon any day now, who saw the benefit of utilizing sex as a means of attaining/advancing personal wealth and political power.
As recounted in that same aforementioned book Genesis, or perhaps better stated, ‘Jenesis’, before entering Egypt, ol’ Abe and his wife Sarah conjure up a ‘plan’, i.e. that Sarah will pretend to be Abe’s ‘sister’ (thus intimating that she is not his wife and therefore a virgin) at which point, she will be taken into Pharaoh’s household as a member of his harem, while Abe for his part will be ‘well-treated’, which he was, according to ‘Jenesis’, to wit–
And when Pharaoh’s officials saw Sarah, they commended her to him, and she was taken into the palace of Pharaoh… Pharaoh treated Abram well on her account, and Abram acquired sheep and cattle, male and female donkeys, menservants and maidservants, and camels…
Now, given their history throughout the ages and knowing this particular pedigree of people as well as we do, doubtless that–although not specifically discussed or detailed in Jenesis–Abe and Sarah had other ‘plans’ as well, namely Sarah sleeping her way to the top (as later took place with the Jewess Esther in that silly Old Testament story found in the book bearing that same name) thus giving Abraham a vulture’s eye view into the inner workings of Pharaoh’s court and thus affording Abraham ‘inside information’ that could be used in not only increasing his own personal wealth and power, but more importantly, in furthering the ‘plans’ he had viz getting his hands on that ‘promised land’ that yahway, the same deity who would later instruct Abraham to murder his own son, had bequeathed to Abraham and his ‘seed’ as an ‘eternal inheritance’.
The problem however is that–according to the narrative as it appears in Jenesis–Pharaoh’s entire household comes down with some mysterious ‘sickness’ shortly after Sarah is taken into the harem, at which point Pharaoh realizes that old Abe has pulled a fast one on him by claiming that Sarah was his ‘sister’ rather than his wife, a ‘mystery’ that is no mystery at all when one applies a little common sense in figuring out that the reason Sarah was unable to bare children (as described in Jenesis) was because she was infected with one or perhaps several venereal diseases, all of which made their way into Pharaoh’s household once she became part of the harem, to wit–
…The LORD, however, afflicted Pharaoh and his household with severe plagues because of Abram’s wife Sarah. So Pharaoh summoned Abram and asked, ‘What have you done to me? Why did you lie to me and tell me she was your wife? Why did you say, ‘She is my sister,’ so that I took her as my wife? Now then, here is your wife. Take her and go!…
Thus the very first pogrom/expulsion and first recorded case of what we refer to here on this humble little informational endeavor as–
NON-ATYPICAL-GENTILE-ADVERSE-ALLERGIC-REACTION-RESPONSE- SYNDROME
–Otherwise known by its more common/colloquial name–
‘Anti-Shemitism’…
And the story of Abraham and Sarah is not the only one.
In that same book known as ‘Jenesis’, Abraham’s nephew Lott gives his 2 virgin daughters away to a group of gangbangers from the nearby city of Sodom, instructing them to ‘abuse them as it may please you.’ We already discussed Esther who–as the OT makes Kristol Clear–used her sexuality to climb to the highest levels of political power in ancient Persia in order to bring about a Judaically-led slaughter of 75,000 Persians as recounted yearly in the twisted religious celebration known as Purim.
Therefore, the Hebrew/Israelite/Judah-ite who features in this news story who has decided to enter politics with a bang, no pun intended, despite his claiming to not practice his Judah-ism, nevertheless is doing EXACTLY that by producing/starring in his own porno video and using it as the launching pad for his hoped-for political career.
And make no mistake about it, ladies and Gentile-men…
–If someone from within the conservative Christian community pulled the EXACT same stunt, he/she would be disowned…
–If someone from within the VERY conservative Muslim community pulled the EXACT same stunt, he/she would be disowned…
But all can rest assured that the Hebrew/Israelite/Judah-ite featured in this story will not only NOT be disowned by his ‘peeps’, but as well, his ‘marketing strategy’ will be met with a tsunami of praise and support and will quite possibly result in him being welcomed into the halls of Congress, where he can work alongside this creature–
and this one–
and this one–
and this one–
and THIS one–
And all the rest of the Purple Gang–
–In bringing the ‘protocols’ of the learned elders of Zion into reality, resulting in the very same Armageddon/Apocalypse that the ‘founding fathers’ of Judah-ism envisioned thousands of years ago and which–no pun intended–all ‘ends with a bang’, to wit–
The Jewish Daily Forward
Once upon a time, politicians could be ruined by a leaked sex tape. Remember Eliot Spitzer?
Now they’re publishing their own porn videos.
Mike Itkis, an Independent candidate running for a New York Congressional seat, released a video entitled ‘Bucket List Bonanza’ featuring him having sex with Nicole Sage, an adult actress and model.
Itkis, a former officer in the U.S. military, is the longest of longshots against U.S. Rep. Jerry Nadler, a Manhattan Democrat and dean of the Congressional Jewish Caucus, who has served in the House for three decades.
Itkis, 53, said he published the 13-minute video to show his support for legal sex work, which is one of the three issues that make up his campaign platform; the other two are cybersecurity and ending the war in Ukraine, from which Itkis emigrated in 1979 at age 11.
‘If I would just talk about it, it wouldn’t demonstrate my commitment to the issue,’ he said.
The release is perhaps a sign of changing times in the Manhattan district, whose denizens are more closely associated with Zabar’s — Nadler canvassed outside the historic Jewish deli — than with strip clubs.
The congressional district was recently redrawn to encompass parts of both the Upper West Side and the Upper East Side, pitting Nadler in a primary battle against another longtime Democrat House member, Carolyn Maloney. A major theme of his successful primary campaign was his belief that New York needs to retain at least one Jewish member in its House delegation.
Itkis claims that his Soviet-era documents listed him as Jewish. But he also said he does not consider himself ‘Jewish’ in a religious sense, as his campaign website declares his atheism in bold type, alongside a proclamation that he is ‘Not married. No kids. Not celibate.’
There’s little evidence that the legal status of sex work is a pressing issue to the area’s residents. The culture of the Upper West and East sides is known more for run-ins with your grandma’s friend at a bagel shop or synagogue — and, of course, the sort of stuffy, old-money wealth that defined shows such as ‘Gossip Girl.’
But District 12 also now includes areas of Queens and Brooklyn, whose residents tend to be younger and less affluent, more likely to work in nightclubs, and perhaps more concerned about protections for sex workers.
Itkis said in a statement that making the video was ‘one of the most meaningful experiences’ of his life, and so central to his campaign that he did not register to run until after it was completed.