[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBYAAj0n-Nw&app=desktop]
ed note–watch as the guest IMMEDIATELY launches into the accusation that the host is pandering to ‘Jewish conspiracies’simply for her referencing Congressional testimony concerning instances of documented terrorism in the United States by the Jewish Defense League.
Again, at the risk of sounding like a broken record, this is why it is so important to never lose control of the narrative by interjecting things into an argument that may sound like they are a good idea at the time but which later result in you losing the debate.
I think this connects very strongly with what you say,Mark. Start the video at @ 7:49:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Js-DgJgJIk
It’s extremely important what the guest says. Notice his very powerful allusion to the pharisees.
Mark, you write:
“Again, at the risk of sounding like a broken record, this is why it is so important to never lose control of the narrative by interjecting things into an argument that may sound like they are a good idea at the time but which later result in you losing the debate.”
If you have the time, I’d like to hear what you think she should have said (in other words, if you could use this as an object lesson.) Or maybe you can just mention this in your next pod cast.
NLG
ed note–actually, the one I was referring to here was Jeffry Lord, who blew it by interjecting the accusatory question to whats-her-name about there being an ‘international Jewish conspiracy’ as a retort to her mentioning the Congressional testimony. His doing this cost him major points in the discussion.
“…the Pharisaical mentality of moral condemnation.” (I’m referring to video linked in my previous point.) Notice how John Laughland pinpoints it to the decline of Christian civilization and a Pharisaical take-over. Such a statement would never be uttered on CNN.I think what Laughland says has direct bearing on this video. Again, see the video I link to in my previous comment.
I think she was awesome!
I only wish that when he said, “the Muslims will have to do this themselves” she had retorted, “the Jews also have to ‘do this’ themselves. Does it bother you that NO American Jews ever took the podium publicly or did the talk show circuit — as the Muslims are expected to do — to excoriate the JDL? After all, the Muslims accused of acts the terrorism on US soil were all foreigners, whether the JDL criminal thugs were all “home-grown” terrorists, oy, the “Americans boys next door”…
She is great! I don’t think she will last long on CNN. Nor whoever hired her
Take note how the Jew Kosher Conservative ,uses the same ” Conspiracy theory ” defense distraction that the ” Liberals ” love to use ?
See how all Jews operate from the same central Left/Right system ?
Remember this ,Jews are always ” innocent ” as a group .
This ovrrides any outward ideological partisandhip on there part.
If you confronted him about the espionage of the Rosenbergs ,or Pollard he would recoil as a ,” Conservative ” with the same ,” Jewish Conspiracy theory ” ,aside .
The ” Patriotic Republicans ” watching Ashley Banfield will surely accuse her of being a ” Liberal hater of dear Jews “, and the sanctified ” Liberals ” , will see this as ” proof of a new McCarthyism “.
The Jews have their prisoners in the Left /Right Matrix all sowed up.
The small groups that identify themselves as white nationalists and identitarians (for retaining different ethnic groups by opposing mass immigration) are excited by Trump’s campaign. They have heard him explicitly mention the suffering of Christians in wars today and the other day he said in a speech he wants to bring back the greeting “Merry Christmas.” I have never heard anyone else say these things in public to an audience. He has explicitly stated his opposition to illegal immigration, but has not stated any opposition to non-white immigration. He openly expressed his desire that bright Asians continue to come to the US, attend its top universities and stay here and start companies that will employ people. So, despite not representing exactly what white nationalists want, they heartily support him.
Trump’s anti-Muslim rhetoric also appeals to them. Similar to Trump, I have not seen white nationalists point out that it has been the USA that has provoked Islamic hatred of the US (and other western nations) for its decades of wars against Muslims that have taken over a million lives and destroyed much of the middle east. That it hasn’t been middle eastern countries interjecting in American or European affairs but Americans that provoked the hate with their anti-Muslim policies, including mass murder thru bombing and that much of this is done for Israel. What “some” white nationalists do say, but Trump does not, is that Jews are anti-white and a big problem for any white or European country. I think these same people would say Jews are a problem for any country of any ethnicity, but there concern is for whites. So my difference with Trump and white nationalists is what they don’t point out, namely that the problem between the west and Muslims was brought on by the west and its undying support for racist Israel.
Here is my question for this website. I wonder how the editors feel about the positions of white nationalists that I agree with? They say that European countries and those countries founded by Europeans (USA, Australia, Canada) are being overwhelmed with non-white immigration. That no non-white countries (China, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt) or any other countries are deliberately destroying their cultures and ethnic makeup thru mass immigration of people completely incompatible. I like to say that it would be a shame to see any of the great Asian or Islamic cultures destroyed also, but I agree with them that they are not threatened by mass immigration from different cultures. So how do the editors here feel?
In Europe, they call white nationalists racists. These are the same of people that support mass immigration and think supporting the preservation of French, German or any European identity is racist. Included among these people are those in Germany that consider “Bomber Harris” (generally considered responsible for the destruction of Germany’s cities and for killing one million Germans) a hero and chant for him to do it again.
ed note–everyone here is in agreement that every group (save the Jews) has a right to their nationalism and has every right to preserve their culture, their race, etc.
Where we differ however is in how we view the typical ‘white nationalist’. My experience in dealing with them on a very personal level over the course of the last 20 + years is that they are not as much devoted to preserving their identity and way of life as they are just looking for a venue to complain over the fact they are undereducated, undersexed, underemployed, and how it is everyone else’s fault besides their own that this exists. The obvious proof of this is the ‘activism’ taking place in Europe and elsewhere. That the wars and economic exploitation by the West is the cause of all this ‘immeeeeegrayshun’ is not up for debate. Boatload after boatload of refugees from Syria, Iraq, Libya, etc, are not fleeing their war-torn lands and heading to Europe s that they can steal jobs from whie men and have sex with white women.
But, what is the response on the part of the various WN groups in Europe? Are they getting together and protesting the wars? NO. Are they getting together to protest the economic exploitation that results in people looking for a better source of food and shelter? NO. They get together and protest against the Judaically-constructed theme of ‘no Islamization of Europe’, as if Islam were the problem and not western policies of war that have made Middle Eastern lands uninhabitable.
As I said, everyone has the right to protect their way of life, but (sadly) at this moment, white nationalism–save that of Jobbik in Hungary–is putty in the hands of organized Jewry who are using it to further this clash of civilizations that must take place if both cultures–western and middle eastern–are to wipe each other out as the Jews have planned.
Jeffery Lord is a Literary Agent in Harrisburg PA .
@ #5 Every nationalist should be careful he doesn’t fall prey to the same “chosenness” of the Jews. It doesn’t matter what you are–white, black, yellow, and everything in between–if you practice any kind of “chosenness,” then you are leavened with the leaven of the Pharisees. This is a spiritual war. At the deepest level, it has nothing to do with how one’s biochemistry is ordered. You have to go beyond the polarizing, binary constructs. Everyone is not the same. There are real differences in culture, race, etc. But chosenness, Judaism’s gift to the world, is what is tearing the planet apart. You can be different, celebrate your uniqueness, love your uniqueness without thinking that the entire cosmos orientates around your haplogroup.
sadly, must agree with the ednote (assume it is MG) to Peter’s question–I spent a lot of time with wn’s and the one thing common to them all is that they are just plain angry at their lot in life and it is everyone else’s fault. If they would do something productive with all that angst they would be out in the streets of their various countries, protesting the wars and making their countrymen understand that the cause of all the immigration problems could be dealt with if the people brought an end to the wars. they don’t do that, and for obvious reasons–if the wars end, so does the immigration problems and then they have nothing to complain about.
I wasn’t able to view the video until now. She is great. I hope young journalism students are taking notes.
Some people think big changes are ahead. Someone compared it to 1989 when communism collapsed. If big changes do take place, I hope one of those changes includes discussing what Jews do is not forbidden. That could bring changes like 1989 in my opinion.
I agree with Mark that the ugly face of rabid white nationalism, which is essentially racism and chauvinism with a large dollop of bigotry in the mix, is a current plague of the Western world. It has been nurtured by Jews in that two-step game that Dante succinctly calls the Jewish Left-Right matrix, whereby Jews masquerade as the humanitarians and anti-racists who wish to teach Europeans some coexistence ethics (see that horrid Barbara Spector
http://www.whyileftsweden.com/?p=198) ), while fanning the flames of Islamophobia on the other side.
I think, however, that the label “white nationalism” has become a sort of catch-all basket. It cannot be strictly equated with the kinds of tattooed skinheads one encounters in the Northwestern American states or among the Tea party rednecks.
Far from being all uneducated, unemployed, disgruntled losers who blame their lot in life on Muslims or Mexicans, the large (and growing) segment of the populations of many European nations, many well educated, who basically oppose the massive immigration (millions and more millions) of Middle Easterners and Africans (who happen to be mostly Muslims), are reacting out of a natural instinct of self-preservation of their nations, their traditions, cultures and even religion or lack thereof. They have a right to preserve the social and cultural landscapes with which they identify, rather than hear the call of the muezzin in Tuscany, or see a menorah installed in the piazza, just as any nation the ME has the right to preserve theirs without “us” bombing them to pieces or stealing their treasures.
I also think it is important to remember that although it was the Western powers’ destruction of many countries from which most of the immigrants originate, two wrongs do not make a right. In fact I would argue that it would be THREE wrongs: first the chaos and carnage inflicted on the ME and parts of Africa by USrael and its vassals, second the “opening of the dam” by zionist-led Western governments that started what looks like a directed flood of massive immigration with pre-planned destination, which devastates European countries, and third, the permanent damage to both the dislocated immigrants (many unassimilable in Europe) and to their countries of origin deprived of a whole generation of young people. These young men should be back home reconstructing their countries with funds provided, not by the taxpayers who had no say in the wars, but by those who profited from them, instead of selling knock-off “brand” watches and handbags made in China on the sidewalks and beaches of Europe.
We should oppose both the smashing of nations like the Palestinians and the Syrians and of any European country. Not to oppose the massive immigration is a disservice to all except the Judeozionists. Not because the immigrants are Muslims, but because they do not belong there, but in their own countries where they have a right to live unmolested any way they wish to, according to their traditions, culture, religion and choice. I am not an Islamophobe or a racist but the day Paris looks like Morocco, Stockholm like Tripoli, and Damascus like Tel Aviv will be the day the Jews have won irrevocably. The will have destroyed what they hate so much so explicitly: the “nations.” The whites have a right to defend their survival and their cultures as much as any other ethnic group.
And now Germany speaks up. It took 1 million illegal immigrants in 2015 to a country of 82 million but finally people are getting angry. The German hating magazine Der Spiegel (founded by an Englishman after the war ended) is complaining about “right wing” violence (I guarantee you they don’t report on the government backed left wing violence), rising voices about American warmongering (Der Spiegel thinks this accusation is a lie), calling Merkel a traitor, rising support for Putin (Der Spiegel wants another war with Russia), complaints about the “lying press” and Bismarck-era war flags being waved at protests. The protests are growing in size and so are the “far right” parties. The magazine is also bothered by the popular image shared on Facebook of “a blond woman with a blond child in her lap”.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/refugee-crisis-drives-rise-of-new-right-wing-in-germany-a-1067384.html
From a zionist Jew’s face
The wicked Devil speaks to us,
The Devil who, in every country,
Is known as an evil plague.
Would we from the zionist Jew be free,
Again be cheerful and happy,
Then must youth fight with us
To get rid of the zionist Jewish Devil.
Peter, you highlight an issue of fundamental importance: the provision of information to the public. Does the public have a right to information that is accurate, comprehensive, and honest about all issues?
Where should information be placed in relative importance alongside wholesome food, clean water, effective sanitation and fuel/energy? I don’t know, and the order doesn’t really matter. What does matter is that each of them is vitally important to the well-being of a nation or society.
All of these needs must be served to the highest achievable standard.
Allowing minorities with a history of abusing the common good of a society to own and control the media of public information is more than negligent. It is corrupt, and it is treasonous!
Within a nation, this amounts to an essential service waging perpetual civil war against the nation’s ordinary people.
One is left gasping in amazement: can this be real?
It is real – just about everywhere!
These evil-plotter Zionists know very well how to create frictions of words and then swords between the followers of Islam and Christianity in order to both groups exterminate each other.This is blessing for the sky for these blood-thirsty Zionists to see both faiths gone-to-tube.
Zionists are very successful creating so called ‘Muslims-Christians Clash of Civilization’ by funding both the extremist elements (or groups) in Muslim and Christian societies.
The following video illustrates explicitly who funds the “Fake Sharia Movements” as well as the “Well-Known Islamophobia Industry” in Europe:
The Zionist War on Islam & The Next False Flag In London