FBI on San Bernardino massacre: Alleged shooters did NOT post support for jihad on social media
Bytut editor
Dec 16, 2015
Intelligent & thought-provoking 'anti-Semitism' for thinking Gentiles....theuglytrutheditor@gmail.com
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Thanks a lot for posting this. But I have some questions. Mark and others, can you please tell me what you think? Thanks in advance guys/gals. Please take a look at this LA Times article. It goes more in depth, and I’ve described my confusion below the LA Times article link:
–>FBI chief: San Bernardino shooters did not publicly promote jihad on social media – LA Times–>Last week in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Comey revealed that the couple had posted a message on social media on the day of the shootings pledging allegiance to the Islamic State, before they were killed in a police shootout in San Bernardino. Afterward, Islamic State leaders praised the couple as “martyrs” but did not claim any involvement in the plot.<<-
An update:
I’ve discovered that believe it or not, the FBI/Comey are STILL STICKING to the story that Malik allegedly posted (for her and her husband) a so-called “pledge” to “ISIS” on FB while they started the attack! This is not confirmed either way in much of the sites posting this latest news (including on Salon), but it is saying exactly that in the Washington Post’s posting of this news. That said, IMO, this was a false flag/psyop (99% chance).
Also does anyone think that there may be a Mexican cartel dimension to this? Allegedly San Bernardino has seen a lot of activity related to various Mexican drug cartels, and it’s also supposedly an area where there are a lot of drug busts and petty drug crimes (aside from the more serious nature of any Mexican based cartels, which also maybe a factor there). Of course former AG Holder had the whole gun running op, the Fast and the Furious (that actually started under Bush), so who knows what the PTB would try to pull.
Here’s a link to the Wash. Post and the paragraph which is stating that Comey is still sticking to the original, fantastic, likely BS, very hard to believe angle as far as Malik making that post:
FBI: San Bernardino attackers didn’t show public support for jihad on social media
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2015/12/16/fbi-san-bernardino-attackers-didnt-show-public-support-for-jihad-on-social-media/
(…)
—-These messages are distinct from a note Malik posted on Facebook after the shooting pledging her allegiance to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the emir of the self-proclaimed Islamic State, the militant group that says it has established a caliphate in Syria and Iraq, according to law enforcement officials. Authorities say that posting was made on behalf of her husband as well.—-
I just noticed now that my first post from 5:18 am was cut off before I could explain my confusion. Is it okay if I repost it? Or maybe should I reword some things? Please email me if you would like. Thanks a lot