ed note–the ‘storm’ Trump was referencing in very cryptic tones, with all his main military men standing alongside him, was ‘Hurricane Harvey’–The now in-our-faces campaign of sustained carpetbombing on the part of Trump, Inc against Judea, Inc with allegations of criminal sexual assault on the part of high-ranking Jewish execs working in the mainstream media, Trump’s # 1 enemy.

And while everyone else (including various ‘experts’ in the ‘9/11 truth movement’) seized upon this as ‘proof’ that Trump was a warmonger out to get WWIII started, assuming it involved either North Korea (with tensions deliberately conjured up just prior to this gathering and announcement) or Iran (also with tensions deliberately conjured up just prior to this gathering and announcement) what he really meant was war against the organized Jewish interests out to destroy his presidency and out to destroy America.

LA Times

President Trump was clearly looking to make some kind of news, but about what, exactly, was not clear. And the mystery, as it often does with a president whose statements baffle even his staff, only deepened the next day.

On Thursday evening, the White House told the presidential press corps that Mr. Trump was done with his public schedule for the day. But around 7 p.m., Mr. Trump summoned reporters who were still at work to the State Dining Room, where he was throwing a dinner for military commanders and their spouses.

Gesturing to his guests, he said, “You guys know what this represents? Maybe it’s the calm before the storm.”

“What’s the storm?” asked one reporter.

“Could be the calm before the storm,” Mr. Trump repeated, stretching out the phrase, a sly smile playing across his face.

“From Iran?” ventured another reporter. “On ISIS? On what?”

“What storm, Mr. President?” asked a third journalist, a hint of impatience creeping into her voice.

As the generals shifted from foot to foot, Mr. Trump brought the game of 20 Questions to an end. He praised his beribboned guests as the “world’s great military people” and excused the stymied reporters, who returned to their workstations to start another round of: What was the president talking about?

By Friday, the White House was still unable to shed light on the matter; several of Mr. Trump’s aides said they had no idea what the president meant. But the press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, wanted to make one thing clear: Mr. Trump wasn’t just teasing his favorite antagonists. He was sending a message.

“I wouldn’t say that he’s messing with the press,” Ms. Sanders told reporters. “I think we have some serious world issues here. I think that North Korea, Iran both continue to be bad actors, and the president is somebody who’s going to always look for ways to protect Americans, and he’s not going to dictate what those actions may look like.”

Suddenly, Mr. Trump’s preprandial banter took on an ominous tone. Maybe he was foreshadowing war with North Korea, which he has already threatened with “fire and fury” if the reclusive country aimed its missiles at the United States. Or perhaps he was predicting a clash with Iran, a week before he is expected to disavow the nuclear deal negotiated by his predecessor, Barack Obama.

“He certainly doesn’t want to lay out his game plan for our enemies,” Ms. Sanders declared.

Sometimes, though, Mr. Trump’s statements leave his own staff in the dark, forcing them to impute a meaning to his words that might not actually exist. Privately, a few aides said they did not believe the president was preparing the country for war with either North Korea or Iran.

But they also noted Ms. Sanders has had a more successful debut as press secretary than her predecessor, Sean Spicer, in part because she has not attempted to clean up Mr. Trump’s statements – something that would rankle the president. 

The president’s penchant for provocative statements is well established. In March, Mr. Trump tweeted, “Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my ‘wires tapped’ in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!” The Justice Department later said there was no evidence that Mr. Obama tapped his apartment during the 2016 campaign.

Pressed by reporters at the time, Mr. Spicer tried to walk back the claim, saying “the president used the word wiretaps in quotes to mean, broadly, surveillance and other activities.”

Mr. Trump also shows an obvious delight in keeping people guessing. At the United Nations last month, he announced he had made up his mind about how to handle the Iran nuclear deal, but was not going to tell the public. When he met Prime Minister Theresa May of Britain, perhaps America’s closest ally, she asked him what he had decided. He refused to tell her, either.

“I didn’t know he was going to say today he’s made a decision,” a bemused Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson said at the time. “I knew he had, but I didn’t know he was going to say he had.”

Henry A. Kissinger, the former secretary of state, is credited with coining the principle of constructive ambiguity in diplomacy: the use of deliberately fuzzy language to overcome sensitive issues in negotiations between countries. Mr. Trump may have tried a variation of that on Thursday evening, except that he was applying it to military deterrence.

In his prepared remarks to the military leaders, Mr. Trump outlined a series of specific challenges.

“We have had challenges that we really should have taken care of a long time ago, like North Korea, Iran, Afghanistan, ISIS and the revisionist powers that threaten our interests all around the world,” the president said, using the an acronym for the Islamic State.

What made Mr. Trump’s reference to the “calm before the storm” particularly tantalizing was the timing.

For weeks, he has promised to retaliate against any North Korean aggression toward the United States. When Mr. Tillerson spoke in Beijing last week about seeking diplomatic channels to the North, Mr. Trump followed up with a tweet that his chief diplomat was “wasting his time trying to negotiate with Little Rocket Man,” the president’s nickname for the North Korean dictator, Kim Jong-un.

Mr. Trump also faces an Oct. 15 deadline to recertify the nuclear deal with Iran that was negotiated among world powers during the Obama administration. He is expected to decline to recertify the agreement, which would essentially kick it to Congress to decide whether to reimpose economic sanctions against Tehran.

But it is equally plausible that Mr. Trump was merely being theatrical, using the backdrop of military officers to stir up some drama. As the president spoke, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Paul J. Selva, stood next to him stoically.

Perhaps it is not Mr. Kissinger, but his former boss, Richard M. Nixon, who is the president’s model. Nixon devised the “madman theory” of statecraft, under which he hoped to keep the nation’s foes off balance by persuading them that he was impulsive and unpredictable.

Asked whether Mr. Trump had adopted Nixon’s keep-‘em-guessing approach, Ms. Sanders said, “If you’re asking, is the president trying to do that? Absolutely. I mean, I don’t think that’s a secret.”

As for Mr. Trump, he seemed to savor the speculation. When a reporter asked him during a signing ceremony in the Oval Office what he meant by the “calm before the storm,” he winked, paused, and said, “You’ll find out.”

5 thoughts on “What Did President Trump Mean by ‘Calm Before the Storm’?”
  1. I love the way President Trump keeps these jmsm whore’s guessing what moves he’ll make next. Nothing like using Mossad’s own motto against them.

  2. “ed note–the ‘storm’ Trump was referencing in very cryptic tones, with all his main military men standing alongside him, was ‘Hurricane Harvey’–The now in-our-faces campaign of sustained carpetbombing on the part of Trump, Inc against Judea, Inc with allegations of criminal sexual assault on the part of high-ranking Jewish execs working in the mainstream media, Trump’s # 1 enemy.”
    Yeah, sure, good luck with that. Don’t hold your breath. I don’t think the lying sac was referring to NK or Iran either but Jews are probably way down on the list.
    Maybe he meant an actual storm storm. With Nibiru being inside our solar system (and chemtrails actively obscuring) we should be getting major tidal and and volcanic activity. Go ahead and call me a tin foil hat whatever before you do any research into it.

    ed note–Prima facie evidence as to why I say there is little to no hope for this ‘movement’.

    Image result for reasonable explanation

  3. #3 Sure doesn’t live in the real Hymietown also known as JewYork. Any gentile who does business in this judeaic cesspool(my own father had a business that had jew lawyers for clients) learns how to deal with them or learns the hard way (as my father did by having to close his company because they ripped him off so many times by not paying their bills on time or just plain not at all).

  4. Funny, I was thinking the same thing. And your “‘movement'” is going nowhere fast. Try to get over your indoctrinated beliefs in the so-called system. If they’re lying about this, why aren’t they lying about that? NASA? Sure, OK. Still not giving up on you though. Something like the enemy of my enemy…
    ed note–there is no belief in any ‘system’. In fact, even a cursory examination of what goes on here reveals in a microsecond that the ‘system’ is scrutinized, criticized, and delegitimized on this very website every day, to the tune of approximately 15,000 articles.
    But engaging in the process of scrutiny and criticism does not mean going over the cliff and into the abyss of nonsense, as you did with your inane commentary dealing with Nibiru. There is a reason why engineers included brakes in cars as well as gas pedals and this is the problem with folks who–in the spirit of the deceased Michael Jackson, ‘don’t stop till they get enough’ vis a vis alternative ‘theories governing major events we see taking place today.
    And while I can somewhat appreciate your stance vis a vis the old saying with regards to the ‘enemy of my enemy’, at the same time I am not so quick to accept that premise either in this case, since both the gazelle and the hyena have a common enemy in the lion, but it would be absolutely foolish for the gazelle to find some spirit of kinship and camaraderie with the hyena.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading