Nigel Farage condemned over ‘Jewish lobby’ comment

ed note–keep in mind that this fact–the overwhelming and disproportionate influence that this particular group of people enjoy over all others in the areas of politics and money is as much a fait accompli and a statement of fact as saying that water freezes at 32 degrees Fahrenheit.

And not only is it a fait accompli and a statement of fact, but something about which they themselves often brag. Nothing that Farage said is factually untrue at all, no more than were he to say that Scotland represents the northernmost region of the UK.

What this little ‘jrama’ demonstrates is the inherently dishonest and duplicitous manner in which organized Jewish interests carry themselves today. Like a crook who threatens the witnesses that the prosecutor has assembled against him, he knows he is guilty and in an atmosphere of full disclosure, free discovery, free inquiry, and free speech that he doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell of getting an acquittal.

Likewise with Jews who understand exactly the nature of the game they are playing and the extent to which they as a group are in a state of war against every society in which they live, they must corrupt the evidence and testimony against them if they are to continue.

The one good thing that comes from ‘jramas’ such as this is that those ‘middle of the road’ types who can’t (or otherwise refuse to) recognize the enormous problem that all Gentile societies face as a result of this pernicious influence will more and more see for themselves exactly the nature of what is taking place, given that anyone who makes a fuss over someone stating the plain facts involving the overwhelming power that Jews as a group hold over politics and money might as well be making a fuss over someone saying that water is wet and fire is hot.

The Jewish Chronicle

Nigel Farage has been criticised for referring to “a powerful Jewish lobby” operating in America.

Mr Farage, who was presenting his phone-in show on the LBC network yesterday, took a call from someone identifying himself as “Ahmed” during a debate on Russian influence in last year’s US presidential election.

“How come there’s such an issue with Russia, and no one really highlighting AIPAC and the Israeli lobby and their involvement in American politics and elections”, the caller asked.

Mr Farage, referring to the “Israeli lobby”, responded by saying Ahmed had made “a reasonable point”.

He added: “There are about six million Jewish people living in America, so as a percentage it’s quite small, but in terms of influence its quite big. They have a voice within American politics, as indeed do the Hindu groups and many other groups in America. But I don’t think anybody is suggesting that the Israeli government tried to affect the result of the American elections.”

When the caller claimed Israel had Democrats and Republicans “in their pockets”, Mr Farage, the former leader of UKIP, responded: “In terms of money and influence they are a very powerful lobby”.

He went on to thank “Ahmed from Leyton”, who he said “makes the point that there are other very powerful lobbies in America, with the Jewish lobby, that has links with the Israeli government, is one of those strong voices”.

Social media users condemned Mr Farage’s comments.

“Nigel Farage spewing anti-Semitic conspiracies over the radio, nobody cares because he’s right-wing”, one person tweeted, with another sarcastically saying “Nigel Farage slips into antisemitic tropes of Jewish power and wealth. Shocked, I tell you, shocked!”

Adam Langleben, a Jewish Labour councillor, posted a link to the excerpt of Mr Farage’s show, saying the politician had gone “full conspiracy”.

He tweeted: “Person calls in and compares AIPAC to Russian collusion. Farage plays up influence. Interchanges “Israeli” and “Jewish” lobby.”

A Board of Deputies spokesperson said: “Nigel Farage’s clumsy use of the terms Israel and Jewish lobby interchangeably and his reference to their ‘power’ has crossed the line into well-known antisemitic tropes. We would advise him to be more careful in his use of language in future.”