ed note–Now, 5 years after the fact, it is (or at least should be) apparent to all that the entire ‘Hoaxer’ phenomenon that was birthed in the immediate aftermath of the Sandy Hook massacre was, is, and will remain a sophisticated intelligence operation aimed at discrediting those who ask questions about major political events and as a means of scaring away otherwise open-minded people from looking any further than whatever the ‘official narrative’ happens to be on any given event.
Notice the other items that are dragged into the ‘hoaxer’ world–9/11, Israel, Zionism, etc. With one swoop, the over-the-top insanity of what is now a very real phenomenon–‘hoaxerism’–results in all dissenting opinions or questions being relegated to kookery and quackery.
Please note how (beginning at around the 18 minute mark) it is specifically stated in this documentary how Google, Youtube, Facebook and other MAJOR sources of mass information have up until now refused to rein in the ‘hoaxer’ crowd, a curious situation that–in terms of understanding the strategic importance of nutter groups such as these in helping create a narrative the results in major political and intelligence paradigms–is immediately understandable. They WANT these groups out there in furthering along their agenda of making all otherwise responsible, informed and intelligent skepticism of major events appear unhinged and dangerous.
2 thoughts on “Must Watch–Truthers: When Conspiracy Meets Reality”
My father and a friend of mine were incredulous on Sandy Hook, Boston, and 9/11 (and the Moon landings–they didn’t go). So I convinced them to follow me around on the Internet as I made thoughtful comments about the the above scams.
Very soon they began to comment on the shallowness and nastiness of the responses I was being targeted with. They slowly figured out that most of, if not all, the responses I got were from paid shills.
To which I added, that if we “hoaxers” are such nut jobs, why are such massive amounts of financial and human resources being devoted to attacking us?!
They’re still in denial, but the sand under their position is now much wetter.
An American citizen, not US subject. ed note–there is a difference–a big one, in fact–between staking out the position that there is more to Sandy Hook than what we’ve been told vis outright stating that ‘nothing happened’, that ‘no shooting took place’ and that ‘no one died’.
And the reason that ‘massive amounts of financial and human resources being devoted to attacking’ the ‘hoaxers is because by your very existence, you do the dirty work of the enemy in making all responsible skepticism and speculation look unhinged and insane.
Notice how much coverage they have given to Mike Piper’s thesis concerning Israel’s assassination of JFK or to the survivors of Israel’s attack on the USS LIBERTY vs the amount of coverage they afford to people like you–for simple reasons–your very existence serves their purposes. It’s a no brainer as they say.
@16:56, Andy Parker stated: “You don’t want to impede the First Amendment. That having been said, there needs to be some kind of policing, and if Google, or Facebook, or Twitter, if they’re not going to self-police or self-regulate, then I think the next step is we’ve got to see some legislation in there that will hold them accountable.”
Lesson to be learned: Unless you have smoking gun proof, don’t bother. And that’s exactly what the plan was from the beginning, that everyone should SELF POLICE.
My father and a friend of mine were incredulous on Sandy Hook, Boston, and 9/11 (and the Moon landings–they didn’t go). So I convinced them to follow me around on the Internet as I made thoughtful comments about the the above scams.
Very soon they began to comment on the shallowness and nastiness of the responses I was being targeted with. They slowly figured out that most of, if not all, the responses I got were from paid shills.
To which I added, that if we “hoaxers” are such nut jobs, why are such massive amounts of financial and human resources being devoted to attacking us?!
They’re still in denial, but the sand under their position is now much wetter.
An American citizen, not US subject.
ed note–there is a difference–a big one, in fact–between staking out the position that there is more to Sandy Hook than what we’ve been told vis outright stating that ‘nothing happened’, that ‘no shooting took place’ and that ‘no one died’.
And the reason that ‘massive amounts of financial and human resources being devoted to attacking’ the ‘hoaxers is because by your very existence, you do the dirty work of the enemy in making all responsible skepticism and speculation look unhinged and insane.
Notice how much coverage they have given to Mike Piper’s thesis concerning Israel’s assassination of JFK or to the survivors of Israel’s attack on the USS LIBERTY vs the amount of coverage they afford to people like you–for simple reasons–your very existence serves their purposes. It’s a no brainer as they say.
@16:56, Andy Parker stated: “You don’t want to impede the First Amendment. That having been said, there needs to be some kind of policing, and if Google, or Facebook, or Twitter, if they’re not going to self-police or self-regulate, then I think the next step is we’ve got to see some legislation in there that will hold them accountable.”
Lesson to be learned: Unless you have smoking gun proof, don’t bother. And that’s exactly what the plan was from the beginning, that everyone should SELF POLICE.