Alex Jones, backtracking in the face of crippling lawsuit now says Sandy Hook shooting did happen

Is this father going to produce photographic evidence and an autopsy report? That’s all we need.
ed note–the father has produced it over and over, including to Halbig himself, and it wasn’t enough to convince any of the acolytes held captive by the Sandy Hook Hoax cult.
Nevertheless, rest assured it is all going to be produced in court, as well as eyewitness testimony from the police, EMTs, medical examiners, victims’ families, survivors, etc, and will be made into the circus of the century for everyone to see as the final nail in the coffin of the 9/11 truth movement, and we can thank the morons who were too stupid to see that they were being played as suckers by the Jews on this for bringing it all about.

Yes, it’s best to know with whom you are dealing. It’s like all of the JFK conspiracy authors who wrote seemingly great exposes but were in fact simply keeping the hamsters spinning on their little wheels.
Take Mark Lane for instance, who was the preeminent JFK ‘investigative’ author, whose book “Rush to Judgment” was deemed by many in the conspiratorium as the definitive JFK tome.
Come to find out later, Mark Lane was the attorney for The People’s Temple, of Jim Jones infamy in the 1970s, and had been in army intelligence during world war II.
Come to find out Mark Lane was in Guyana when the slaughter of the followers of Jones (mainstream reports were they drank cyanide laced kool-aid to commit suicide) and Congressman Leo Ryan was assassinated while attempting to leave Jones’ “Temple” compound after having arrived the day before to investigate the bizarre reports of the goings-on there. Mysteriously, Mark Lane survived the massacre because he reported he’d been told to leave the compound just before the killing began and he ‘went missing’ in the Guyanese jungle for a couple of days.
Come to find out Mark Lane subsequently bought Liberty Lobby/American Free Press for some odd reason. So nothing is what it appears when it comes to conspiracies. Just enough is revealed to keep people guessing.
ed note–I was a paid writer for AFP for close to 2 years, was at the office on many occasions, was commissioned by them to travel/cover certain news items and through my very close working relationship with Mike Piper, RIP, I knew/saw things that only a few others did.
I also met Mark Lane in Washington DC when I was invited by AFP to be one of the speakers at its 2006 conference, before I had been hired on as one of their writers.
Mark Lane DID NOT ‘buy’ Liberty Lobby/AFP. He had no controlling interest in it. He was–for a brief period of time–their lawyer, but that is all. Yes, the part about him being in Guyana during the Jonestown incident is true as far as I know, but it remains–as far as it involves AFP–merely an interesting factoid, and that is all. The statement that Lane ‘bought’ LL/AFP is patently false and only underscores why so many important battles are lost to the enemy when something as easy to research and verify as this isn’t. Imagine what happens when things of even more importance–such as the shootings at Sandy Hook, etc–become part of a deliberate campaign of disinformation that is passed along by ‘truthers’ like a bottle of whiskey without anyone asking any questions about its veracity whatsoever.
This battle will not be one by chance, but by calculated chess moves and this means making sure that when we throw a statement out there for others to consider, that it is true.

Editor: thank you for that information. I appreciate it. And consider me appropriately castigated.
From Wiki:
“[Mark] Lane represented the political advocacy group Liberty Lobby as an attorney when the group was sued over an article in The Spotlight newspaper implicating E. Howard Hunt in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Hunt sued for defamation and won a substantial settlement. Lane successfully got this judgment reversed on appeal. This case became the basis for Lane’s book Plausible Denial. In the book, Lane claimed that he convinced the jury that Hunt was involved in the JFK assassination, but mainstream news accounts asserted that some jurors decided the case on the issue of whether The Spotlight had acted with “actual malice”. Lane represented Willis Carto after Carto lost control of the Institute for Historical Review in 1993.”
{I assume, but I ONLY assume, because I’ve not found anything else in my perusal of different websites, blogs, articles and the like, that this is the time period in which Mark Lane worked for Liberty Lobby.}
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/477/242.html
United States Supreme Court
ANDERSON v. LIBERTY LOBBY, INC., (1986)
No. 84-1602
Argued: December 3, 1985 Decided: June 25, 1986
“Mark Lane argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Linda Huber and Fleming Lee.”*
————————————————————————————————————-
This was/is John McAdams’ perspective on Lane’s defense of LL:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/denial.htm
These are McAdams’ concluding paragraphs from the link above:
“Plausible Denial is thus an artfully crafted exercise in withholding evidence from readers. Lane withholds the names and testimony of several of Hunt’s alibi witnesses, the credibility problems of Marita Lorenz, and the fact that the verdict hinged not on whether Hunt was an assassination conspirator, but rather whether the article met a narrow legal definition of “malice.”
Unlike most conspiracy books, which pepper readers with factoids, Lane seems to be very careful to avoid saying things that are provably untrue. Rather, by the careful withholding of evidence and the calculated spinning of the evidence he actually presents, he makes his case. And unlike most conspiracy authors, he seems to actually know what he’s doing.”
In this post, McAdams includes 3 links to other articles appearing on his site which indicate that Lane was misinforming by omission/commission. I’ve not had time to read those articles yet.
——————————————————————————————————
Here is a “previously unpublished” interview article of Mark Lane where he weirdly can’t help but toot his own horn and seems to have very often been at the right place and at the right time:
https://whowhatwhy.org/2016/05/26/exclusive-previously-unpublished-interview-mark-lane/
“Jury: CIA Involved in JFK Assassination”
http://www.libertylobby.org/articles/2000/20000207cia.html
I leave the reader to his/her conclusions.