GOVT SLAVES – While British politicians have increasingly “declared war on knives,” recently moving to ban the kitchen utensil in the name of keeping citizens safe from knife violence, since the 2014 war in Gaza, the UK government has approved the sale of $445 million in arms to the state of Israel.
The UK attempting to criminalize those carrying knives, after largely banishing guns, while simultaneously selling Israel arms—including parts for sniper rifles that are routinely used to kill innocent Palestinians—is the height of hypocrisy. CONTINUE READING
2 thoughts on “UK Moves to Ban Knives—As They Simultaneously Sell Israel Sniper Rifles to Kill Palestinians”
the ban itself is illegal.
All protestants shall be allowed arms for their defense, 1689 Bill of Rights.
The bill of rights is a constitutional act, and therefore can only be repealed by the creation of an act of repeal. No such act exists, therefore the above stands as the law in England. Scofflaw politicians have abusively created invalid laws which they and the pig-thugs lie about and say are valid due to the doctrine of implied repeal, but the doctrine of implied repeal does not apply to constitutional acts (most recently affirmed by Lord Justice Laws, 2002, case of Thoburn v Sunderland City Council) and therefore it’s the Violent Crime Reduction Act 1986 which is invalid, not the Bill of Rights. This means that every “confiscation” is not only invalid but constitutes an act of criminal theft. Using S24A PACE you can arrest the policeman who tries to take your knives!
From a country which bans peashooters but lets you buy the Pioneer Airbow, nothing surprises me anymore.
the ban itself is illegal.
All protestants shall be allowed arms for their defense, 1689 Bill of Rights.
The bill of rights is a constitutional act, and therefore can only be repealed by the creation of an act of repeal. No such act exists, therefore the above stands as the law in England. Scofflaw politicians have abusively created invalid laws which they and the pig-thugs lie about and say are valid due to the doctrine of implied repeal, but the doctrine of implied repeal does not apply to constitutional acts (most recently affirmed by Lord Justice Laws, 2002, case of Thoburn v Sunderland City Council) and therefore it’s the Violent Crime Reduction Act 1986 which is invalid, not the Bill of Rights. This means that every “confiscation” is not only invalid but constitutes an act of criminal theft. Using S24A PACE you can arrest the policeman who tries to take your knives!
From a country which bans peashooters but lets you buy the Pioneer Airbow, nothing surprises me anymore.
Ignorantly zionized british scum . . .