MIDDLE EAST EYE – Britain has a long history of supporting Israeli aggression. As the mandatory power in Palestine from 1920 to 1948, Britain enabled the gradual takeover of Palestine by the Zionist movement. When the Arab revolt against Britain and its Zionist proteges broke out in the late 1930s, the British army brutally crushed it. The UK supported Israel’s brutal takeover of Palestine in 1948 and also aidedIsrael’s 1967 war, having furnished Israel with hundreds of British tanks.
Two reasons are clear in explaining current British policy. One is commercial: arms exports and trade are increasingly profitable to British corporations. The other is that UK policy towards Israel is to a large degree determined inWashington and by London wanting to curry favour with the US and not challenge its closest ally.
ED-NOTE – And the third reason which the author fails to mention or perhaps even acknowledge, is that Britain is the first Rothschild Empire. Britain has been drinking at the chalice of Judaism since at least the XVIth century, since she willingly and joyfully chose the path of Protestantism, since Henry VIII. Mike Piper (RIP) defined Britain best: it is the first Yiddish Empire. The dangerous liaisons that Britain has maintained with the Jews is much older than the US and has nothing or little to do with Washington. London, not Washington, is still to this day, the world headquarters of International Jewry. CONTINUE READING
I would reverse the order of those reasons with your ‘3rd reason’ clearly at the top. That explains the relentless political support through the few post-WWII years leading to the 1948 establishment of the Israeli state, in spite of relentless Zionist terrorist attacks on the British security forces and infrastructure at that time. The British army hated the Zionists – their ZOG political masters in London loved them and – as is always the case in such situations – it was the poor bloody infantry that suffered.
@our dear Editor: It’s amazing that many more people have not yet figured out the B’rith-ish are not the English. As to it being the first Yiddish empire, that may be debatable, but I don’t have enough information to make that case. People who visit your site may be interested in looking into the Pilgrim Society.
REMARKS of HON. J. THORKELSON OF MONTANA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
August 19, 1940
https://archive.org/details/CongressionalRecordRegardingBritish-khazarZionistWorldGovernmentAndTha
https://watch.pairsite.com/pilgrim.html
I would reverse the order of those reasons with your ‘3rd reason’ clearly at the top. That explains the relentless political support through the few post-WWII years leading to the 1948 establishment of the Israeli state, in spite of relentless Zionist terrorist attacks on the British security forces and infrastructure at that time. The British army hated the Zionists – their ZOG political masters in London loved them and – as is always the case in such situations – it was the poor bloody infantry that suffered.