US president publicly addresses prospect of removal from office for first time
ed note–it should not need mentioning, but we’ll do it anyway, if for no other reason than if we don’t, the obvious central point in all of this will totally escape a ‘truth muuvmnt’ that has now for all intents and purposes become as defunct and as dysfunctional as a Ferrari with no engine in it–
Where are all those powerful Jewish organizations–left, right, and in between– rushing to Trump’s defense? Where are all the threats, maneuvers and machinations–some very hush-hush and others very loud and proud–that typically arise whenever some ‘kept’ politician finds him/herself embroiled in some imbroglio that threatens his/her removal as a cog in the great Merkava tank which Judea, Inc has constructed in achieving the great Judaic agenda? Where were the ‘fixers’ to warn Cohen off from his recent about-face? Where is the 24/7 expose’ of the embarrassing (or possibly even incriminating) details of some peccadillo involving Mueller in order to destroy his credibility and necessitate ‘for the healing of the nation’ his removal as special council?
All of this (and more) falls squarely within that domain known as ‘no brainerism’, and yet these obvious/in-your-face/up-close-and-personal clues as to just why the ‘Trump is owned by Djooz’ theorem holds absolutely no water whatsoever is not even weighed rationally for a microsecond amongst a depressingly-high percentage of jeenyus-es, eks-purts and prah-fits in the ‘truth muuvmnt’ who–much like the sheep in George Orwell’s Animal Farm–simply spout pre-learned slogans that oftentimes not only have no bearing on the subject matter being discussed, but as well have absolutely no relevance to the topic either.
You’re reading this wrong. It isn’t a coincidence that the (((MSM))) jacked up the volume to 11 right after their Hollywood pedo buds started getting outed. When Tom Hanks name appeared, they swung into action to protect the even bigger pedos.
ed note–please tell me you are joking. All this business about Cohen, Manafort, ‘Russian meddling’ in the elections and impeachment is to distract people from the pedophile scandals?
Are you serious with this?
Ok, perhaps a little history lesson is in order here in better contextualizing all of this.
Trump has been president for close to 2 years now. During the ENTIRE TIME of his presidency, the ‘I’ word has been thrown around like a football, CONSTANTLY. Impeachment, impeachment, impeachment.
The first noises of the pedophile scandals arose with the whole business involving Harvey Weinstein in October, an ENTIRE YEAR after Trump was elected, meaning that for an ENTIRE YEAR already, talk of impeachment was daily fair in the JMSM.
So if, as your theory suggests, all of this business involving the ‘I’ word now is about distracting people from the pedophile scandals, what was the basis for all the discussions involving the ‘I’ word for the entire previous year, when there were no ‘pedophile’ scandals?
I don’t think we are reading this wrong at all. I think you are, and I’ll give my own theory as to why.
For over 2 years now, this website and its editors have asserted that ‘the Jews’ don’t like Trump, don’t trust him and see him as a danger to their plans. Throughout the entirety of this discussion, we have had to deal with certain elements within ‘duh muuvmnt’ who have reflexively and without much consideration maintained that the editors here were wrong, that the Jews just LOVE Trump, that he was ‘their boy’ who was put into office in the same way that they have maneuvered other politicos into position who were going to further their interests, and that all the noise emanating from Judea, Inc against him was all just ‘an act’.
Now, the ‘chickens’ are coming home to roost as the saying goes, and all the things which we have predicted here are coming to pass vis a vis the conspiracy to take Trump down by the very same organized Jewish interests whom certain elements within ‘duh muuvmnt’ claim just LOVE Trump, and now, these elements are scrambling to come up with some kind of explanation that will suffice in sparing them the embarrassment of having to admit that they were wrong and that the editors here at this website were/are right.
But, on second thought, naaaaahhhh, your theory makes much more sense. They don’t REALLY want to get rid of Trump. They just LOVE him and everything we have witnessed up to this point is all just ‘an act’.
It’s virtually impossible for a POTUS not to be “owned” by da jooz.
Why?
Der are “deez jooz” and der are “doze jooz”; an internecine rivalry.
The real no-brainer is that conventional logic need not apply. A proper reading of the protocols of the elders of zion tell as much
ed note–and here we go again…
Then please explain the following BH–
1. JFK
2. RFK (on his way to becoming president when he was assassinated)
3. Nixon
4. Trump
How would explaining the situations involving these presidencies NOT reflect the existence of the rivalry I allude to?
Regarding the Kennedy brothers it could easily be construed that killing them was in the interest of both factions because they both represented a threat to a common interest regarding the primary and consensual tool of control, namely – money. Putting the kibosh on the Fed would have thrown a major monkey wrench into the whole kit ‘n kaboodle.
Nixon? Could something similar be said about why he was railroaded by Watergate? Not with any intentions of abolishing the Fed, mind you, but having something to do with returning to some form of a gold standard, as I seem to recall.
The situation with Trump looks to be something involving another matter altogether, and it wouldn’t be a stretch of imagination in considering what it may be when taking the premise of “deez jooz and doze jooz” seriously.
ed note–and here we go again…
With all due respect BH, this entire line of discussion you have adopted is as productive in forming a better understanding of what is taking place as does your other pet project, which is peddling the theory that Israel’s nukes are all just a ‘hoax’.
Does Trump have a handful of Jews who support him?
Yes, a handful, and of those, there are some whose ‘support’ must be weighed through consideration of just what kinds of counterpressures (embarrassing or even incriminating information held against them?) that is being used to buy that support.
It is evident now, and particularly in the aftermath of all the drama of the last week vis a vis the conviction of Manafort and Cohen’s betrayal–that THE JEWS AS A GROUP ARE GUNNING FOR TRUMP. All the rest of it, the “deez jooz and doze jooz” as you put it, is irrelevant in any discussion now as to the nature of the intrigue all the world is witnessing and in truth all it does is to further cloud a picture that minute by minute is coming into better focus with all the drama taking place on a daily basis.
With all due respect, MG, my “pet project” as you term it is essentially no different than yours, given the respective lack of empirical evidence which COULD validate either of what can only be seen as theories on both our parts.
What you fail to consider is the distinct possibility that there are TWO primary factions of Zionists at play here. The one backing Hilary in 2016 being the neocon brain trust compromised of Khazarian descendants whose ambitions may well have come to fruition by now had HRC become the POTUS
In spite of the omnipresent Neocons in the Executive branch the other faction backing Trump are “keeping the Khazarian wolves at Bay”
You tell me this wouldn’t go a long way towards explaining the great uproar of attempting to remove Trump from office
We truthers could use more of this line of thinking
ed note–we have acknowledged that there are 2 different factions of Zionists at war with each other here, many, many times. In fact, if we want to put a number to it, I’d say somewhere between a million and a billion times.
However, the inherent liability to a discussion of this sort–and particularly within a ‘movement’ that still can’t seem to get past the ‘zionism vs judaism’ thing in a rational manner, resides in the fact that a large part of those making up the masses of asses are completely intellectually incompetent when it comes to processing sticky situations such as what you are describing here (i.e. ‘zionist vs zionist’) and who, rather than doing the difficult mental work of putting things in their proper perspective, can instead be counted on in 11 out of 10 cases to add their voices to the chorus of those seeking Trump’s ouster so that WWIII can pick up where it left off.
At this point, what matters is that there is a man sitting as POTUS who has made it is his mission to avoid lighting that fuse leading to Armageddon which the Jews are demanding, and therefore, it is incumbent upon us out there with some degree of discernment to not make an already-difficult and dangerous situation all the moreso by ‘intellectualizing’ the discussion in such a way that it can be used by our enemies to turn otherwise allies to our cause to liabilities.
We can all debate the pros and cons of the ‘zionist vs zionist’ paradigm after the doomsday clock has been stopped. Until that time, we should not do the enemies’ bidding by adding to Trump’s woes with our own brand of political noise pollution.
It’s all “noise pollution”, brother. My entire premise states that these factions are respectively jockeying for geopolitical position through the various nations involved in an array of confusing and complex alliances.
It’s not a matter of an “Armageddon which the Jews are demanding” when the Jews involved aren’t on the same page to begin with. Not when both are vying for supremacy in lording over the “goyim spoils”.
If Trump were to somehow survive this political onslaught, even to the point of a doubtful 2nd term, it’s not as if he’s the president for life (as his Russian counterpart seems to be)
So what exactly would being the POTUS be preventing in the long run when they’re all in the pocket for the “Don Corleone” banksters anyway?
Cut off the head of the snake and the body will die, and the “snake” is steadily becoming an International monetary control.
Even if Trump survives this J-onslaught, and I think he may well survive it even though he’ll be battered/bruised/buffeted, I worry almost more at this point about what happens once his 4 or 8 years are over. We don’t have presidents for life. And these sons-of-b!tches have nothing but time and money.