These were remarkable and uncertain times in US history.
ed note–as we like to point out here, if it appears in a mainstream media owned whole hog/lock, stock & barrel by organized Jewish interests, there are specific reasons for it, and those reasons ALWAYS relate to furthering some narrative that benefits those same Jewish interests.
In this case, a piece appearing in one of the most-read news outlets in Israel at the very least suggests/intimates that indeed DJT was planning the use of the military in the hours leading up to the Inauguration of ‘Uncle Joe’, Israel’s choice for POTUS and as discussed on the most recent TUT program.
As our unesteemed Hebrish writer clearly states, it was no less than DJT’s Sec. of Defense himself who suspected that something was in the works involving the use of the military in contravening the installation of Joe Biden as Israel’s choice for POTUS.
Then, Jan. 20th rolled around, and well, nothing happened, despite what had been a several-month/high-intensity media coverage period speculating that a ‘coup’ was in the works on the part of a ‘disgruntled’ DJT.
But this does not mean that nothing was planned, as the piece below clearly intimates.
At this point, it would appear that the cancelling of those planned military actions was rooted in the sudden ‘discovery’ 2 days prior to Inauguration (and which also received high-intensity media coverage) that there were members of the National Guard loyal to DJT possibly planning to ‘assassinate’ Biden, meaning that the same Deep State had as its own contingency plan assassins in place to do exactly that and to have the blame for it fall squarely on DJT in the same manner as took place a mere 2 weeks earlier with the ‘insurrection’ at the Capitol and for which he was Impeached for a 2nd time.
jpost
An article in Vanity Fair by Adam Ciralsky has laid bare some kay aspects of US president Donald Trump’s final days in office. In particular, the article sheds light on the crucial role of the US Defense Department during the weeks leading up to the inauguration of President Joe Biden.
These were remarkable and uncertain times in US history. When there is chaos and fear of insurrection, the behavior of vital people is brought to light, and they are put through a crucible of needing to make the right decisions at the right time. The article is important because it sheds light and references some key aspects of the last days of Trump.
“I sought and secured a front-row seat to what was happening inside the Department of Defense, the only institution with the reach and the tools – 2.1 million troops and weapons of every shape and size – to counter any moves to forestall or reverse the democratic process,” writes Ciralsky.
The article begins with acting secretary of defense Christopher Miller at the White House with his chief of staff, Kash Patel. “They were meeting with President Trump on ‘an Iran issue’” on January 5, the article states. We now know that the next day a massive protest in Washington would lead to attacks on the US Capitol and ransacking of offices of US senators. This was unprecedented.
The article includes important insights from Miller, Patel and Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the under-secretary of defense for intelligence.
Miller came with experience from wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. He had commanded an airborne Special Forces battalion. The report looks at a week in his life prior to January 19. Sec Def Miller had three goals, he told the writer: “No military coup, no major war and no troops in the street,” before observing dryly, “The ‘no troops in the street’ claim changed dramatically about 14:30… So that one’s off the list.”
It shows the extraordinary place the US was in, during the fall of 2020 after the US election, and that a “coup” was even being considered. The reference to a coup is left hanging. It’s not clear what Ciralsky meant. It is known that Trump attempted to reverse the election result and that US National Guard were called into Washington on January 6, and that more than 20,000 were deployed.
Overall, the important article leaves many questions about the key weeks and months leading up to the end of the Trump administration and also leaves open questions about what the administration wanted to do but didn’t accomplish.