ed note–again, as we like to point out regularly on this humble little informational endeavor, one of the primary/principal reasons that the world finds itself in the dangerous pickle that it does these days is due entirely to several important factors, the most important of which are as follows–
1. The incapacity/unwillingness on the part of the ‘99%’, meaning the Gentiles of the world, to come to rational grips with the fact that there is as distinct a difference between them and their ‘better brethren’ of the Judaic persuasion as exists between sheep and wolves, the former being an herbivore and the latter being a sheep-eater,
and–
2. That the distinct difference between the 2–Gentile and Jew–manifests itself in many ways, not the least of which is the use of multi-layered/nuanced meaning in terms of language, and especially when such ‘language’ is put out for public consumption.
Case in point being the re-published piece below featuring Israeli Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz and his statement that ‘settler violence’ is a ‘national strategic threat’ that will spark ‘violent conflict with the Palestinians’.
The average Gentile reading Horowitz’ Jewspeak will immediately (and innacurately) arrive at precisely the pre-determined understanding that Horowitz’ words were meant to produce, which is that–
1. Settlers and the violence they produce are ‘abberrations’ and not harmonious with the philosophical underpinnings of Zionism and of the Jewish state,
and
2. That the Jewish state really, really, REALLY does not like the idea of ‘violent conflict’ with the Palestinians.
Both premises are 666% factually untrue, as much as it is factually untrue to say that sheep and wolves are basically the same animal due to the fact that they both run on 4 legs, have protruding ears and are covered with fur.
In the first case, there is nothing aberrant about the violent settlers as far as the entire Zionist project goes. The Jewish state was midwifed into existence from the hellish womb of its jestation by the same pedigree of violent, fanatical zealotry that today typifies the average cross-eyed, inbred, drooling, Torah-terrorist settler who throws Molotov coctails into quiet, sleeping Palestinian homes in the middle of the night. Every Prime Minister, whether right-wing (Likud) or left-wing (Labor) ‘made his bones’ in the early days of the Jewish state’s birth by murdering Palestinian civilians in massacres that by comparison, make the present-day violence perpetrated by the settlers seem mild.
Furthermore, what must be remembered is that the followers of Judaism, the ‘children of Israel’ as they like to refer to themselves, understand that this violence is not just ‘perogative’ on their part, but MANDATORY per the ‘protocols’ and teachings of their Judaism as part of the ‘redemptive process’, to wit–
Alright, yet another prima facie axiomatic example of what we have coined here at this humble little informational endeavor, a ‘protocol’ that must be plugged into all Gentile analysis of any and all Judaic misinformation/disinformation which is that–
FISH SWIM, BIRDS FLY AND JEWS LIE
So, the question that must be asked/answered then is the following–What is the aim, what is the primary objective on the part of our Torah-terrorist Horowitz with the use of such language?
Easily answered–
1. To paint the faux picture that the Jewish state is ‘normal’ in that it does not favor the use of violence, but is forced to do so only as a ‘last resort’, thus neutralizing what is becoming more and more every day the growing awareness on the part of large numbers of Gentile peoples and ‘nations’ that there is something ontologically and organically aberrant about this theocratic concoction that is the source of so much unrest and turmoil in the world.
The ‘tell’ that favors this answer is the simple 9-letter adjective which Horowitz uses in describing the ‘threat’ which the settlers pose–
STRATEGIC
As in, the violence in which the settlers engage against the Gentiles in the region, violence which today, in this ‘information age’ of the internet, smartphones and cameras, harms the STRATEGY and the STRATAGEMS which must remain in place if the wool is to be kept pulled over the eyes of the rest of the Gentile sheep, no pun intended.
And right there, ladies and Gentile-men, is ‘the rub’.
jpost
Settler violence is a ‘national strategic threat’ designed to spark a violent conflict with the Palestinians, Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz warned during a closed-door debate in the security cabinet, Army Radio reported Sunday.
‘These are organized and preplanned activities designed to drag Israel into violence and bloodshed,’ he said.
Prime Minister Naftali Bennett did not respond to his words during the meeting, which took place last week, while Defense Minister Benny Gantz (Blue and White) defended the settlers.
Horowitz said the army needs to do more to halt such violence.
Gantz said the army prevents many incidents and has worked to halt others.
Army Radio said it based its report on information from three ministers.
Bennett’s office said it did not respond to queries about the substance of cabinet debates, adding that the prime minister’s views were well known. He opposed slandering the settler population and agreed it was important to halt any such violent activity.
It is the latest in a number of leaked media reports about heated conversations in the security cabinet on the matter, which has also generated very public debates in the Knesset.
The Left has bemoaned the lack of adequate law enforcement, while the Right has argued that attention would be better directed to Palestinian violence against Israelis.
Samaria Regional Council head Yossi Dagan retorted that Horowitz was ‘infected with a severe post-corona strain of anti-Israel hatred, a virus that was probably affecting not only his heart but his eyes.’
‘What is ‘shameful’ here is not Horowitz’s words, for we have become accustomed to delusional hatred from the radical and insane extremist Left,’ he said. What is ‘shameful’ here is that such a person is a minister and cabinet member in the Israeli government.’
Efrat Council head Oded Revivi said it was ‘unfortunate that the health minister had not battled for the country’s health with the same determination that he fought against his brothers the settlers.’
‘Violence in any form in any place in any society is a threat,’ he said, adding that there were more violent civilian attacks in Israeli cities than there were nationalistic crimes in Judea and Samaria.