ed note–well, it’s that time once again, ladies and Gentile-men, where we at this humble little informational endeavor get to throw down the ‘we told ya so’ card.
And, just for the record, we do so not with as much as a MICRO-MILLIGRAM of gloat or glee attached to it, but with plenty of disgust and disappointment, for sure.
The reason we get to throw down this ‘we told ya so’ card is because the apocalyptically-dangerous situation about which we warned 6 years ago is now knocking on all of our doors in a manner very much ‘up close and personal’ and has–to some small degree, no one knows exactly what that particular number is–been made possible through the suicidal stupidity of certain characters making up ‘the moooovmnt’ who did not possess the minimum intelligence required in seeing that it was this–
THERMONUCLEAR WAR WHICH THE ORGANIZED FORCES OF ANTI-GENTILISM INTENDED TO GET STARTED
–That was precisely what a certain DJT POTUS was moving heaven, hell, and everything in between in trying to prevent…
All the signs were there from the very beginning for anyone–and especially someone billing him/herself as an ‘ekspurt’ on geo-politics where Zionist intrigue plays a part–who bothered to do the very simple math involved in it all.
The ‘NeoConservatives’–NeoCons for short–were out IN FULL FORCE from the very moment that DJT came down the elevator at Trump Tower and announced his candidacy. Speaking in virtually ONE VOICE (just as they did in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 where they were in FULL-THROATED screech mode demanding war in the Middle East) they carpet-bombed public discourse on a daily basis with their various OpEds in the numerous Zionist-owned outlets where they plied their trade, throwing their support behind every possible alternative to DJT, including, as infamously took place on many, many occasions, throwing their support behind Hillary Clinton.
And it wasn’t just the theatrics and ‘jrama’ on their end that indicated that a seismic shift had taken place with DJT entering the political stage. DJT himself tried conveying to the American people the fact that he was at war with these same ‘NeoCon’ elements, in one particular case singling out William Kristol as a guy who just wants to ‘start wars and kill people’…
BIG HINT AS TO WHAT WAS REALLY GOING ON BEHIND THE SCENES
The ‘moooovmnt’ had all the open-source information, material and ‘intelligence’ it needed in arriving at the conclusion (or at least the SUSPICION) that DJT represented a ‘shift’ in momentum/equilibrium from the previous Bush/Obama presidencies and that a chance had just presented itself for stopping all of this ‘wars for Israel’ business that–as intended by those operatives working for Judea, Inc–would indeed ‘climax’ with the kind of war all are facing now.
NEVERTHELESS, despite what was a Kristol clear picture that DJT was out to prevent the same inertia-driven Apocalyptic energy unleashed under the little monkey GWB and kept alive by his successor, Obama, the same ‘moooovmnt’ that bills itself uniquely and distinctly ‘gifted’ in decoding and divining the twisty/winding turns of Zionist intrigue in the American political landscape instead hyperfocused on every minor detail such as DJT’s ‘Jewish’ daughter and the fact that he said nice things about Israel as PROOF that he was George W. Bush, Pt. II and was going to start WWIII per Netanyahu’s orders.
In fact however, all the ‘background scenery’ which DJT was forced to produce—including his ‘Jewish’ daughter–was a play-by-play re-enactment of what JFK did in getting elected, after which time he then began to move against Israel in trying to confine her to the cage where she belongs in order to prevent WWIII.
HAVING SAID ALL OF THAT, please note that the author of this piece, none other than Dov Zakheim-
–Who was a CENTRAL FIGURE in the entire 9/11 ‘jrama’ and subsequent ‘war on terror’, including acting as a ‘personal advisor’ to the little monkey GWB during his 2000 election campaign, makes plain where he and his ‘peeps’ intend to take all this Russia/Ukraine business–
WASHINGTON MUST STOP WORRYING ABOUT WORLD WAR III AND ACT
Notice, he is quite ‘open’ about it–
WORLD WAR III WITH A NUCLEAR-ARMED RUSSIA.
Notice as well, he is not advocating that dear little Israel–home sweet home for him and his ‘peeps’–stop ‘worrying about WWIII and act’, but rather the US, Israel’s shabbos goy nation whose only value to the Jewish state is the $30 million a day she receives in ‘aid’ and the rivers of blood–American and otherwise–shed for the benefit of the Jewish state by American military might.
Keep in mind as well that Zakheim was one of those who objected FROM THE VERY BEGINNING–to the notion of DJT ascending to the White House, and we now know why–
PART AND PARCEL OF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP’S ‘DEAL OF THE CENTURY’–BESIDES BRINGING ‘PEACE’ TO THE MIDDLE EAST, WAS ALSO ROOTED IN PREVENTING THE SAME WWIII WITH RUSSIA WHICH ZAKHEIM AND HIS ‘PEEPS’ ARE NOW PUSHING TO GET STARTED.
By Dov S. Zakheim
Over the past week, President Biden and senior members of his staff have asserted that certain actions in support of Ukraine might lead to a direct confrontation with Russia and begin World War III. As Biden put it, ‘We will not fight a war against Russia in Ukraine. Direct conflict between NATO and Russia is World War III, something we must strive to prevent.’
Accordingly, the White House has blocked the transfer of Polish MiG-29 fighters to Ukraine. For the same reason, the administration has denied urgent requests by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for a no-fly zone over Ukraine, even if it is limited to supporting humanitarian operations. The White House also has dragged its heels on transferring Patriot high-altitude air defense systems to Ukraine. And it has rejected calls for sending special forces to assist the Ukrainian army.
There may be good reasons for blocking the transfers. For example, Gen. Tod Wolters, commander of the European Command and NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe, has argued that the transfer of fighters would not ‘appreciably increase the effectiveness of the Ukrainian Air Force.’ Indeed, Russian forces shot down Ukrainian MiGs over Crimea in 2014, and Ukrainian forces have shot down Russian MiGs in the current conflict. On the other hand, Ukrainian pilots have acquitted themselves well against Russian forces, and some argue that providing Kyiv with more MiGs, especially to replace those which the Russians have shot down, would enable Ukraine to prevent Russia from obtaining unrestricted air superiority.
Whatever the merits, or otherwise, of implementing any of Ukraine’s specific requests for systems beyond those it already is receiving from the West, starting another world war should not be the reason for denying those requests.
The World War III argument presupposes that Russian President Vladimir Putin would go beyond his directive to increase the readiness of Russia’s nuclear weapons in response to Western sanctions and what he claimed were ‘aggressive statements’ by NATO.
As matters stand however, Putin’s order to put his forces in a ‘special regime of combat duty’ was actually something less than ordering them on full alert. It called for transferring more troops to buttress the forces that operate Russia’s nuclear arsenal. Nevertheless, the White House fears that, if provoked, Putin could make good on his threats to fire nuclear warheads at NATO forces if they cross whatever ‘red line’ he has set.
Russia certainly has the wherewithal to start a nuclear conflict in Europe; it still deploys approximately 2,000 non-strategic nuclear weapons, roughly 10 times those of the United States.
Yet, the Soviet Union had more than six times as many weapons in 1973, when the United States went on nuclear alert — and did so not in support of NATO, but rather, to protect Israel during the Yom Kippur War. At the time, the Soviet Politburo, seeing that the Israelis had encircled the Egyptian Third Army and were also within artillery range of Damascus, contemplated sending airborne troops to seize the Golan Heights. The Nixon administration responded by going to Strategic Nuclear Defense Condition 3 (DefCon3), one level below the Defcon 2 alert that the Kennedy administration had ordered during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis and the Joint Chiefs ordered in the first stages of the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
The Politburo debated whether and how to respond to the American alert. Defense Minister Marshal Andrei Grechko called for a forcible response. Others, notably KGB chief Yuri Andropov and Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko, argued against precipitating a world war. Leonid Brezhnev, the Soviet chief, backed down.
Washington has not responded to Putin’s threats, but Putin has yet to formally put his forces on nuclear alert. Putin has no idea how the United States might respond, were he to do so, much less to order his troops to fire a tactical nuclear weapon, presumably in line with Russia’s so-called doctrine of ‘escalate to de-escalate.’
Pop psychologists may think Putin is irrational, that he might be prepared to destroy the world if he does not get his way in Ukraine. There is no evidence to that effect, however.
On the contrary, he appears to be pursuing in Ukraine the same strategy that he employed against Chechnya in 1999-2000 — namely, to wear down the opposition by destroying any semblance of normal life among the local population. Like the Soviet Politburo in 1973, the last thing Putin is likely to want is an all-out nuclear war that would devastate his country and put an end to his dream of reviving any semblance of the Russian Empire. Firing off a nuclear weapon could lead to just that.
There have been numerous suggestions — including mine — for the contents of a peaceful resolution of this horrible war. Kyiv has indicated that it is prepared to consider neutrality and forgo its desire to join NATO, but Putin remains unsatisfied. He will negotiate an end to hostilities only when he realizes that he cannot win. That may take more than months, perhaps over a year. For the war to go on that long, however, Ukrainian forces must be able to continue to hold out against the Russian onslaught.
The key to Kyiv’s ability to sustain its resistance to Russia’s aggression is for the White House to stop deterring itself with nightmare visions of World War III. Instead, it should provide Ukraine with not only more of the same systems but also at least some of the more advanced weaponry for which Zelensky continues to plead — and did so before Congress. And it should encourage its allies and partners to do so as well.