ed note–The readers of this website will recall back in 2020 as the Covid panic set in that we cautioned ‘troothers’ against spending too much time in ‘debunking’ the deadliness of the virus, given that the entire ‘op’ may have had as one of its objectives making those same ‘troothers’ look like idiots if/when a REAL pandemic actually took place.
Specifically, what we here at this humble little informational endeavor said was that even if Covid 19 was not the monster it was made out to be–which clearly it was not–what then about Covid 20, 21, 22, etc, obviously all of these being theoretical models of what might be coming later, and that no one should ever kid themselves into thinking that the ‘NWO’ would be above creating/releasing a truly deadly pathogen with the intent of killing millions or even billions of people.
And, based upon the early indicators of how it is being covered in the JMSM, the H5N1 ‘bird flu’ appears to be exactly that, an engineered bioweapon with the REAL potential to wipe out billions of people on earth.
Predictably (and depressingly, we night add) huge swaths of that same ‘trooth’ movement are doing exactly what they should not be doing right now, which is downplaying the possible deadliness of what could very well be the beginning of a REAL killer pandemic, and, just as it was with Covid 19, during an election year when a certain DJT is in the game as if the fate of the entire world were hanging in the balance, which in fact is very much the case right now.
H5N1 is a real virus…In its present form, it ‘popped up’ in 2020, the same year as Covid 19 did. Of those who have been infected with its ‘parent’ virus–the bird flu from which H5N1 originated–it has a proven lethality rate of 62%. What the experts are saying is that if it jumps to pigs, as it did from birds to mammals, then from there, it is just a minor step to it being infectious to humans, and again, with a proven lethality rate of over 50%.
And–all can be absolutely confident that this is by no means coincidental either–it is being found in heavy concentrations within the one staple that virtually all people consume on a daily basis, which is milk, and now, for the first time since its appearance, it is surviving the pasteurization process in 14% of the cases being tested.
So for those ‘troothers’ longing for the good ole’ days of ridiculing the ‘plandemic’ known as Covid 19, remember, just as it was with the ‘Sandy Hook Hoax’ fiasco that resulted in the ‘troooth movement’ losing every micro-shred of credibility that it might have had, as well as bankrupting to the tune of over 1.5 BILLION dollars the one man who was the titular ‘head’ of this ‘troooth movement’, what better way to further destroy any and all remaining credibility than for a group of tin-foilers to make the claim that the H5N1 pandemic is a ‘scam’, all the while that over 50% of those being infected with it are dropping dead.
As we like to remind the readers of this website, of the many uncomplimentary things that can be said about ‘them’–the ‘children of Israel’–the one thing that CANNOT be said about them is that they are stupid.
Forbes
An alarming 14% of raw milk samples taken from states with dairy herd outbreaks contained live infectious H5N1 bird flu, according to new testing results released by the FDA.
The researchers took 275 milk samples from bulk storage tanks on farms in four states where dairy cattle are confirmed to be infected by H5N1. The virus was actually detected in 57.5% of the samples, with further testing showing that a quarter of these contained live, infectious virus.
The results were published in a preprint paper, which has not yet been peer-reviewed by external experts for scientific rigor. However, the paper has sparked a significant response from experts around the world, reiterating the dangers of consuming raw milk.
The researchers also artificially spiked milk with infectious H5N1 virus, before heat treating it in a process designed to mimic pasteurization, which the standard commercial milk supply goes through before sale, finding that the process was very effective at inactivating the virus. ‘These findings demonstrate that the milk supply is safe,’ the researchers stated.
The consumption of raw milk, which has not undergone filtration or heat treatment to remove pathogens, has been responsible for several outbreaks of illness including with bacteria such as campylobacter and comes with significant health risks, according to the CDC. Although there are no documented cases yet of humans getting H5N1 by drinking infected raw milk, there is evidence that mice have been infected via drinking cow’s milk.
The new results come amid a new survey released today which shows that less than half of U.S. adults know that drinking raw milk is more unsafe than drinking milk that has been pasteurized.
The survey, run by researchers at the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania from June 7-10, asked more than 1,000 U.S. adults their beliefs about raw milk, finding that only 47% of respondents knew that raw milk was less safe to drink. A further 30% were not sure, 15% thought it was just as safe and 9% of respondents thought it was safer.
‘It is important that anyone planning to consume raw milk be aware that doing so can make you sick and that pasteurization reduces the risk of milk-borne illnesses,’ said Patrick E. Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Health and Risk Communication Institute at the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.
The survey also found that 20% of respondents weren’t sure how effective pasteurization is at killing viruses and bacteria and 4% thought it was ‘not too effective’ or ‘not at all effective.’ Adults who were 65 or older and/or college educated were more likely to understand the benefits of pasteurization and also correctly believe that pasteurization does not destroy nutrients in milk.
Some beliefs about raw milk were also different depending on political affiliation, with 57% of Democrats believing that drinking raw milk is more unsafe than drinking pasteurized milk, compared to 37% of Republicans.
‘The difference in views of raw milk that we see between Democrats and Republicans is difficult to disentangle from the difference between rural and urban dwellers,’ said Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center. ‘Those in rural areas are both more likely to identify as Republicans and to consume raw milk.’