ed note–as always, ladies and Gentile-men, while the ‘devil in the details’ of the various things that POTUS Donald Trump says may escape the notice of the average Gentile, they DO NOT escape the panicked notice of the war-addicted Judah-ites who are committed to seeing WWIII/Armageddon started in the exact manner as their infernal death-cult theology commands.
Note what the 2 Juhadists interviewed for this piece–Dubowitz and Brodsky–had to say, in COMPLETE CONTRADICTION to what Trump himself stated, not only about ‘avoiding foreign wars’, but as well, the fact that–
‘We will measure our success not only by the battles we win, but also by the wars that we end…’
And to which the 2 forked-tongue Judah-ites responded with–
‘Support for Israel to strike Iran’s expanding nuclear weapons program would be consistent with his position of no foreign wars for America’…
And the other stating–
‘A strike would be very much consistent with the president’s philosophy of peace through strength.’
–Proving once again, ladies and Gentile-men, the veracity of what we here at this humble little informational endeavor have stated somewhere between a million and a billion times, which is that–
FISH SWIM, BIRDS FLY, AND JEWS LIE
Jewish Insider
In his second inaugural address, President Donald Trump emphasized his desire to pull back from and avoid foreign military engagements, leaning into his isolationist foreign policy instincts.
‘We will again build the strongest military the world has ever seen. We will measure our success not only by the battles we win, but also by the wars that we end, and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into,’ Trump said.
He said that his ‘proudest legacy will be that of a peacemaker and unifier.’
Near the beginning of his speech, Trump lamented that the US government ‘has given unlimited funding to the ‘defense of foreign borders’, but refuses to defend American borders,’ a talking point that some conservatives have used in recent years to oppose aid to Israel.
At the same time, the newly inaugurated 47th president emphasized that he would seek to ensure that the U.S. would be ‘respected again all over the world,’ and that he has ‘no higher responsibility than to defend our country from threats and invasions, and that is exactly what I am going to do. We will do it at a level that nobody has ever seen before.’
Some Iran hawks argued that Trump’s comments about avoiding foreign wars didn’t necessarily rule out him supporting or carrying out a strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Mark Dubowitz, the CEO of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Jewish Insider that ‘support for Israel to strike Iran’s expanding nuclear weapons program would be consistent with his position of no foreign wars for America.’
‘The question: Will the president provide everything Israel needs to succeed, including massive ordnance penetrators to destroy Iran’s deeply buried infrastructure and lend Israel the strategic bombers to fly and drop them?’ Dubowitz continued. ‘Or will he fall for an Iran rope-a-dope which yields a deal that doesn’t completely defang Tehran’s nuclear weapons program and merely kicks the nuclear can down the road?’
Jason Brodsky, the policy director for United Against Nuclear Iran, said a strike would be ‘very much consistent with the president’s philosophy of peace through strength.’
‘The best way to avoid wars is to deter U.S. adversaries. Israel has demonstrated in its two strikes on Iranian soil over the last year that it is possible to launch targeted airstrikes against the Iranian system without triggering a large-scale war,’ Brodsky said. ‘This has overturned flawed assumptions that have guided American thinking on Iran for decades — that if you hit Iranian soil, it automatically results in a war akin to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. But that’s incorrect.’
‘In fact, Israel’s operation against Iran in October later pushed Hezbollah into a ceasefire. So I do not see this statement necessarily incompatible with developing a credible military threat against Iran,’ he continued.
Trump additionally inveighed against the American education system in his speech, which he said ‘teaches our children to be ashamed of themselves and, in many cases, to hate our country … All of this will change starting today, and it will change very quickly.’
He added, in a reference to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs, that he would ‘end the government policy of trying to socially engineer race and gender into every aspect of public and private life. We will build a society that is colorblind and merit-based.’
The speech provided few hints or specific details about how the new president plans to address issues like Iran or the broader conflict in the Middle East.