US special forces carried out Paris attack, not Kouachi brothers: Dr. Roberts
Bytuteditor
Jan 14, 2015
Judaism, Zionism and the Toxic Effect of Apocalyptic Religious Delusions on World [email protected]
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Do you see a third person in the car?
Were I to decide exactly what happened right now, and I of course don’t know, I’m just guessing, I would say that certain authorities knew the attack was coming, and let it happen.
They certainly knew before “Al-Q in Yemen” did.
“Americans are a pitifully misinformed people,” says PCR, an American, whilst providing absolutely no proof whatsoever of his CIA did it theory, yet has come to that conclusion, as an intellectual.
Dr. Roberts’ argument hasn’t convinced me this was an American job. Naming the CIA as the perp is low hanging fruit. Fill in the blanks Dr. Roberts. Create a more complete picture of the events. State your argument based on facts, not your predetermined conclusion.
What we know is:
A
B
C
D
What we don’t know is
E
F
G
H
Possible explanations of the unknowns are:
E1
E2
E3
F1
F2
F3
Therefore, the most likely conclusion is Y and not X or Z.
I question the official narrative.
I think Paul Craig Roberts’ original article is better than the Press TV summary of it. Roberts makes many good points, and I urge everyone to read his brief comments.
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/01/13/charlie-hebdo-paul-craig-roberts/
The Charlie Hebdo incident stinks so badly that I would be very surprised if it was not a false flag event, in which the French and /or Israeli and US governments paid assassins to carry out the attack, and then they arranged for the police to shoot two patsies so they would forever remain silent.
Who loses? Muslims, Palestinians, and us, since this legitimizes the “war on terror.”
Who gains? Jews, politicians, warmongers, weapons makers, and right wing a**holes everywhere.
https://quatloosx.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/i_see_false_flags.jpg
It’s much healthier to question such incident especially when they are OVER reported by the Mainstream Monolithic Press and given a bias. It’s quite convenient for the authorities to make a case when the ‘ Alleged Killers ‘ are dead. It’s also very inconvenient when certain people ( that cannot be named, in our free world ) might benefit from such situation. Cui Bono? Who benefits from it, should be the question on everyone’s lips.
http://www.imranhosein.org/news/522-the-malhama-armageddon-draws-closer.html
False attacks making it look like someone else did it: Amos 6:12
It is obvious that after the Sandy Hook bullshit theories and nonsense were spread by far too many people, now far too many people are afraid to acknowledge A LOT of damning evidence that this was a genuine false-flag operation.
READ WHAT ALL IS POSTED HERE: http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?topic=18925.msg75226;topicseen#new
Lindsey