mossad

Man who gave Argentine prosecutor gun said he feared for the safety of his daughters; will be buried Thursday at a Jewish cemetery

ed note–Nisman was an Israeli asset, without question, and his job was to paint a somewhat believable picture framing Iran for the 1994 AMIA bombing perpetrated by Israel. Doubtless, given the stakes involved, he, all his actions, movements, discussions and private maneuvers were being monitored by dozens of different intelligence agencies, including those of Argentina, Iran, Russia, Venezuela and every other political entity that has a stake in the AMIA drama.

Therefore, when he quite hastily announced that he was bringing charges against Kirchner, doubtless he was confronted by the Argentine government along with all the documented evidence of his treason in colluding with a foreign, hostile power to falsely pin the bombing on Iran. At this point, he contacted his handlers in Mossad, told them of the latest development, and in order to prevent a VERY dramatic, embarassing and damning public disclosure of Israel’s role in everything, they killed him.

The only ‘proof’ that Nisman had any of these discussions with Lagomarsino is Lagomarsino himself. The fact that he is a computer specialist and worked closely with Nisman on the business of framing Iran for AMIA indicates that Lagomarsino–if not Jewish himself, nevertheless is probably a contract employee working for Mossad. Therefore, Lagomarsino’s testimony concerning Nisman’s fears is in itself highly questionable.

Having lost the narrative early on in the game, Israel would like the entire Nisman drama to go away as quickly as possible, for fear that any further discussion or digging is going to result in ‘full disclosure’ of facts that would be quite problematic. It is for this reason then that Lagomarsino has been tapped as the fall guy here, doubtless warned that if he doesn’t cooperate with the narrative that he himself will be Nismaned as well.

Times of Israel

The Argentine prosecutor whose sudden death has set off a crisis for President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner no longer trusted even his bodyguards at the end of his life, an assistant said Wednesday.

A tense Diego Lagomarsino, his voice breaking at times, recounted at a news conference here how he came to give Alberto Nisman the .22-caliber revolver used to put a bullet through his head.

The 51-year-old special prosecutor was found dead at his home January 18, a day before he was to go before a congressional committee to accuse Kirchner of shielding Iranian officials implicated in the 1994 bombing of a Jewish community center.

Lagomarsino, a computer expert who is the last person known to have seen Nisman alive, said the prosecutor asked him for the gun, saying: “I no longer trust even the guards.”

Nisman told Lagomarsino he feared for the safety of his two daughters — who are 7 and 15 years old, and were on vacation in Spain at the time.

“Do you know what it is like that your daughters don’t want to be with you because they are afraid?” Lagomarsino quoted Nisman as saying.

“I answered: Look it’s an old weapon, its a 22,” Lagomarsino said.

He said Nisman wanted to “carry it in the glove compartment in case some crazy person came by. It was a weapon that was truly faulty. And he said to me, ‘The only favor I ask of you and you won’t do it for me?”

After Nisman’s death, Lagomarsino was charged with giving a firearm to someone other than its registered owner, the only person to be charged so far in the case.

He appeared at a news conference with his lawyer, Maximiliano Rusconi, who said earlier he would ask that Kirchner be called to testify in his client’s case.

Kirchner has accused former intelligence agents of manipulating Nisman to bring charges against her and then killing him to smear her.

On Monday, she announced plans to disband Argentina’s Intelligence Secretariat and replace it with a new federal intelligence agency.

Investigators initially said they believed Nisman committed suicide, but classified his death as “suspicious” and said they have not ruled out murder or an “induced suicide.”

Nisman’s security chief, meanwhile, has been suspended and is under investigation along with two other members of his guard detail, a judicial source said.

Ruben Benitez, a Nisman confidant and the third officer to be suspended in the case, had coordinated a security team of 10 officers who protected the prosecutor.

According to a leaked statement made to the investigation’s head prosecutor, Benitez said he advised Nisman against buying a gun just days before his death.

But the officers have come under scrutiny for contradictory statements to the prosecutor in charge of the case, Viviana Fein.

And police authorities say the security team broke with protocol by remaining out of contact with Nisman for several hours on the day of his death, and failing to report to their superiors.

Nisman was to be mourned Wednesday at a wake and buried Thursday at a Jewish cemetery in La Tablada, on the outskirts of Buenos Aires.

0 thoughts on “Nisman was ‘wary of own bodyguards’ before death, assistant says”
  1. The “Times of Israel is for Jewish consumption, and is therefore milking this story as far as possible. It ignores Cristina Fernández’ assertion Nisman already owned a .22 pistol, plus a .38 pistol, in addition to the .22 pistol that was found with Nisman. The media outlets continue to overlook this.

    And consider statements like this…

    “Nisman’s security chief has been suspended and is under investigation, along with two other members of his guard detail, a judicial source said.”

    Wow! The corruption (against Jews) must be HUGE, huh? No. When a government official dies, it is routine for the involved parties to be suspended while an investigation is conducted. In every police department in the USA, any time a cop shoots someone, regardless of the circumstances (even in clear self-defense) the cop is automatically suspended, and must surrender his or her weapon while the incident is investigated.

    “Nisman was to be mourned Wednesday at a wake and buried Thursday at a Jewish cemetery in La Tablada, on the outskirts of Buenos Aires.”

    Whoops the Times of Israel is falling down on the job. They forgot to throw in a tidbit about 58 Jewish graves La Tablada supposedly being dug up on 13 Sept 2009. The Jews claimed that someone (“probably Hezbollah”) dug up 58 graves and stole objects from them, including photos of the dead from 8 graves belonging to victims of the (false flag) AMIA attack

    (“And it was five days before the start of Rosh Hashanah!”)

    In reality someone stole some brass urns from a few of the headstones, plus the brass frames of the photos in order to recycle them as scrap. Thieves also steal brass from Christian cemeteries in Argentina.

    TANGENTIAL NOTE: This cemetery thing brings up a side point. There was a time when Jews could get whatever they wanted by simply painting a swastika on a Jewish headstone. Then, because so many false flags were exposed, Jews had to claim that Jewish graves were actually dug up. For example, on 14 July 1990, France outlawed holo-hoax denial in response to Jewish lies about Jewish graves being vandalized at the Carpentras cemetery in France. The president of the French parliament, a millionaire Jew named Laurent Fabius, even claimed that one Jewish cadaver had been dug out of its grave and was impaled through the rectum with a pole! The Jews offered no proof of this, and they didn’t need to. They were Jews. Hundreds of thousands of French idiots marched through the streets, just like the Charlie Hebdo incident. But today, because of the endless line of Jewish false flags being exposed, when Jews want new privileges, and new restrictions on their Goy-slaves, they must make sure that Jews actually get killed.

    https://quatloosx.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/nisman04.jpg

    Looking at this issue overall, I agree with MG’s assessment. The Charlie Hebdo incident gave new life to Jews, and to government bureaucrats everywhere who want to increase the police / surveillance state. Mr. Nisman was under enormous pressure to exploit this incident on behalf of the Jews in Argentina. Therefore on 19 Jan 2015, twelve days after the Charlie Hebdo incident, Nisman suddenly claimed to have “proof” that Cristina Fernández’ and her (Jewish) foreign minister Héctor Timerman had “covered up” Iran’s culpability in the 1994 AMIA bombing. Everyone expected a media frenzy, but Nisman suddenly died just hours before he was to present this “proof.” Why? Because Nisman never had any “proof.” Nisman either killed himself because of his impending shame, or else the Jews suicided him so they could at least get something out of this nonsense.

    https://quatloosx.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/nisman05.jpg

  2. Isn’t it interesting how jews are in charge of this investigation as well as the so-called AMIA investigation?! I previously thought that the scenarios could be that Nisman actually killed himself because his 10 years as the lead investigation PREVENTER were being brought to light quite well by Presidenta Kirchner. I also considerthat his Mossad handlers may well have turned on him and done him in making it look like a suicide. Now that I see how the investigation is really coming together and the NUMEROUS jews at the helm of it, I would not be at all surprised to discover that Nisman may have simply been taken to the global criminal refuge, also known as Israel, to live in luxury for his job well done at preventing the truth from being revealed to the Argentine public.

  3. When I see “TIMES OF ISRAEL” I am very careful not to believe all they say. They are just like the global news media disinformation who tells you only one side of the story but they purposely fail to tell you key information on the subject.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading