god hates jews

JERUSALEM POST – A coalition of jewish organization has asked the University of California to update its definition of anti-Semitism to include the delegitimization of Israel, “as a first step in addressing the alarming rise in anti-Semitic activity on UC campuses.”

More than 30 organizations, including Jewish fraternity AEPI, the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the Zionist Organization of America wrote to University of California regent Bruce D. Varner last month, requesting that substantive measures, such as adopting the State Department’s definition of anti-Semitism, be taken.

In a 2010 fact sheet, Washington’s special envoy to monitor and combat anti-Semitism adopted Jewish Agency chairman Natan Sharansky’s ”three Ds” benchmark for assessing potentially anti-Semitic criticism of Israel, stating that efforts to demonize, delegitimize and apply double standards to Israel qualified as anti-Semitism.

The university’s regents are expected to vote on a statement regarding anti-Semitism in September.

“As you know, campus debate on Israel is increasingly slipping into anti-Semitism,” the coalition wrote in its letter, citing several recent events that had garnered the Jewish community’s attention as proof.

Among these were incidents in which “Zionists should be sent to the gas chamber” was found written on a bathroom wall at UC Berkeley, a Jew applying for a student union position found her suitability questioned on the basis of her religion, and swastikas were painted on a Jewish fraternity house at UC Davis.

“The State Department definition of anti-Semitism addresses the unique nature of contemporary Jew-hatred by recognizing that language or behavior which demonizes and delegitimizes the Jewish state or denies its right to exist may cross the line into anti-Semitism. Such a definition is essential for adequately understanding and identifying anti-Semitism as experienced by Jewish students today,” the groups asserted.

The Simon Wiesenthal Center said that it is working tirelessly, through meetings with UC Regents and officials, to urge them to adopt and vote in favor of the resolution. A spokesperson for the organization told The Jerusalem Post that “public officials have a right and duty to weigh in on and express their viewpoint on important social issues. Anti-Israel harassment and discrimination on campus has reached unacceptable levels and needs to be decried for what it is – anti-Semitism.”

Responding to opponents who have accused the Jewish coalition of seeking to stifle free speech, Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, the director of the AMCHA initiative – the organization spearheading the campaign– told the Post that the statement on which regents will vote “will not be university policy,” but rather an expression of their collective will.

“While the statement is not official policy, we believe it will have a decisive impact on how administrators of all 10 UC campuses identify anti-Semitism and work toward addressing it, as they do all other forms of bigotry such as racism and homophobia,” she said.

“Our goal is to have the university adopt and use a definition of anti-Semitism that will be a necessary tool in accurately identifying its contemporary forms on UC campuses and educating the campus community about it, much as they educate the cam – pus community about racism, sexism and homophobia. We are not advocating the suppression of speech, which would of course be a violation of the first amendment. Through education, we want to change the campus culture, so that anti-Semitism is seen as equally reprehensible as racism, homophobia, etc., and in this way is naturally diminished.”

Understanding the link between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism is “really essential to understanding the kind of anti-Semitic activity that exists on campuses and that’s creating a hostile environment for Jewish students,” Rossman-Benjamin continued.

University of California President and former US secretary of homeland security director Janet Napolitano has already come out in favor of the proposed definition, Rossman-Benjamin said.

Given Napolitano’s support and promises that the matter will be brought up during the regents’ July meeting, “we were very excited and we began to then begin to sort of lobby the regents.”

However, the matter was postponed until September and “the president and regent really stepped back from the question, the clear question about the State Department definition and even specifically speaking about anti-Semitism. Now it was couched as a broader array of different kinds of bigotry that they going to be discussing. And it’s clear that the state department definition is not off the table, they said as much in an interview in the LA Times , but the question is very different.

“We know that there has been a tremendous backlash [from pro-Palestinian organizations],” she said.

“Again, what we’re trying to do is protect Jewish students and ensure they have protection from the kind of anti-Israelism and blatant anti-Semitism. And just by trying to do that, just by trying to have some metric system to sort of look at how this works, what anti-Semitism is so people could identify anti-Semitism, or to educate the community about it, we’re put into the role of being human rights viola – tors and definitely free speech violators.

“If you step back, it’s a struggle about who gets to define anti-Semitism. They claim that the definition, the State Department definition, which is what we promote, is not a real definition of anti-Semitism. And they want to tell every – one, the university regents and the UN and the state and federal legislators, they want to tell them that anti-Semitism has nothing to do with Israel. Because Zionism has nothing to do with Judaism. But yet, from my perspective personally, it’s like, well, you know, how dare you tell me what it means to be a Jew? How dare you tell me what Judaism is?” Rossman-Benjamin concluded

0 thoughts on “Jewish groups seek changes in anti-Semitism definition at California universities”
  1. Hmmm
    One of the many problems with this beyond the obvious fact that it is completely unconstitutional and therefore illegal; at almost 25% of the population is not Jewish. It is therefore impossible to categorize criticism of Israel as an attack on Jews, let alone Judaism itself.
    This is a blatant attempt to censor speech and stifle criticism which goes against the very essence of what makes America such a great country. Shame on those that are so whiling to flush the Constitution and the rule of law down the toilet to protect a country guilty of war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and Apartheid.

  2. anti-Semitism–when the goyim– or the so called self-hating Jews– don’t do what the Jews want them to do.

  3. I suppose the nest step will be a ban on criticizing Bibi, because by extension he is Jewish and Israeli.

  4. gee….I wish I’d said that!
    Israelis have no more right to Palestine than the other nazis had to Poland.

  5. The Jews are forever whining, yet never truly suffer real racism such as they inflict on others, speaking even on a personal level, I have been stabbed by a Jew with intent to kill, poisoned with intent to kill on several occasions, resulting in severe injuries that affect me badly even to this day, I have been very badly injured by a car driven by a Jew engaged to deliberately follow me and attack me with his car, I have had a large number of very serious death threats from Jews with a 12 bore shotgun and several holding knives at close quarters in different incidents over the years, and a whole bunch of other nasty injuries in various situations. Jews don’t know the first thing about being on the receiving end of actual racism.
    When they start saying stuff like someone wrote something on a toilet wall about them, really, they need to just shut right up and just get lost and stop talking crap. Whilst their own number are burning babies alive in Israel, they need to keep a very humble front, yet they are trained to do the very opposite, and shockingly make themselves look both highly important and persecuted at one and the same time in a highly audacious and absolutely disgusting manner, that being in a calculated manner designed to throw people off looking at them as they really should do.

  6. “….25% of the population is not Jewish. It is therefore impossible to categorize criticism of Israel as an attack on Jews, let alone Judaism itself.”
    1. it is not the 25% that turned Palestine into “Israel.” it is the Jews. So, yes, criticizing Israelis, as it must be, criticizing the Jews.
    2. Judaism is the fundamental ideology to which Jews subscribe. So, yes, criticizing Israelis criticizing Judaism.
    3. Why this fear of calling a Jew a Jew?
    4. Yes, it is a blatant attempt to stifle free speech, which include the freedom to criticize any state, any ideology and any hostile organized group, no exceptions.
    5. I have my doubts that America was made “such a great country” by free speech but the Constitution has been trampled often and only served as the curtain behind which all manner of crimes and outrages were committed.

  7. Jews aren’t Semites; I don’t understand. Are Jews crazy? Why do they use a word to describe them that isn’t true? Palestinians and other Arabs are Semites, not Euro Ashkenazis. Isn’t it like if a Swede called himself African? Or if a Mexican claimed to be Irish? Everything with the Jews is upside-down. Lies flow from them like water from a spring. Jews are an insane, despicable people the world would be far better off without. If Israel disappeared tomorrow, the entire world would celebrate!
    Anyway, the Jews ain’t seen nothing yet! Anti-Judaism is becoming universal. Jews are hated, just as they have been for thousands of years, because of their own racist, supremacist, self-serving actions. They refuse to join humanity, forever remaining apart. Their bogus religion hates everyone except their fellow tribe members. Jews have been and remain a blight on humanity. They will destroy the world. Hatred for them will reach an unprecedented level.

  8. Hmmm
    About 75% of the United States is Christian. Does that mean that criticizing the actions of the US is anti-Christian? Obama claims to be Christian, does that mean criticizing Obama or his administration is anti-Christian? Obviously the answer is no, therefore the same applies to Israel and every other country in the world that has a dominate yet not universal religion. Criticizing a country is separate from criticizing its dominate religion.
    But and this is a huge but; Under the first amendment Americans have the right to criticize the Jewish faith and any other religion if they so desire. If Jews don’t like that then I suggest they leave the country. The notion of “hate speech” like “enemy combatant” is simply a made up term (in the current context) created in order to justify taking away our civil liberties.

  9. “..About 75% of the United States is Christian..”
    you must be kidding.!!! the USA is a PAGAN country . Basically satanic.
    The only thing left from Christianity in this country is the NAME .
    There is an excellent essay -written more than 100 years ago– on the subject.

    “..The Old Paganism had a strong sense of the supernatural. This sense was often turned to the wrong objects and always to insufficient objects, but it was keen and unfailing; all the poetry of the Old Paganism, even where it despairs, has this sense. And you may read in those of its writers who actively opposed religion, such as Lucretius, a fine religious sense of dignity and order.
    The New Paganism delights in superficiality, and conceives that it is rid of the evil as well as the good in what it believes to have been superstitions and illusions.
    There it is quite wrong, and upon that note I will end. Men do not live long without gods; but when the gods of the NEW PAGANISMcome they will not be merely insufficient, as were the gods of Greece, nor merely false; THEY WILL BE EVIL.
    One might put it in a sentence, and say that the New Paganism, foolishly expecting satisfaction, WILL FALL , BEFORE IT KNOWS where it is, INTO SATANISM..”

    and WE ARE eye-witnesses of it and…participants as well.
    Unfortunately.
    http://catholictradition.org/Classics/belloc2-1.htm

  10. Hmmm
    Actually no I am not kidding this figure comes from the US government, your idiotic diatribe not withstanding. My point regarding criticism of Israel stands despite your efforts to derail the thread. Though it should be noted that by the definition used by Jewish groups to judge what is hate and “anti” speech your comments qualify. But then that was the whole point of your attack wasn’t it.
    .

  11. I know you are right, though I tend to believe that Jewish souls are ‘Jewish’ souls no matter where they incarnate, which they can do at will. Many Jews that I have met have the ability to consciously leave their bodies, doing astral projection, which allows them to manipulate where they will reincarnate on a conscious level, as the astral plains are timeless. That is one of the great secrets of the Jews and how they maintain their power. They never incarnate as one of their own future victims.
    Jewish souls can enter any convenient DNA they require at the time. No matter what the DNA of the Khazarians, their souls were Jewish I reckon, even with a bit of racial intermingling, though Dr Karl Skorecki tested the Cohanim priests amongst them who are more strictly not allowed to mix racially, and they were almost totally intact Semitic DNA, just the same as those from the Bible lands area from 3,000 years ago he reckons. http://www.aish.com/ci/sam/48936742.html
    Anyway, I know most people would just regard that as Jewish propaganda to justify the Jews keeping Israel, but I don’t think that Israel is justified anyway. I think that Elhaik was the real fake geneticist, as the idea that most Jews are not real Jews came originally from a plan by Arthur Koestler to displace or deflect opprobrium away from ‘true’ Jews and ‘true’ Judaism by making out that all the bad things done by Jews were not really being done by Jews at all, and the Jews can really work with that and really use that to their advantage, even though on the surface level it might appear that by saying so they are cutting their own throats by apparently undermining the right to Israel for most of them. It only takes the existence of a few ‘genuine’ Jews in Israel to continue it’s ‘legal’ justification anyway, so even proving that most Jews are not Semitic would not do the slightest thing towards dissolving the state of Israel. Jewish authors are the main ones putting the idea about anyway, and that is a big clue that it ultimately serves the Jewish purpose, though I know that a great many good people buy into the idea who actually oppose Judaism and Israel. What it really does is to allow them to distance Judaism from what Israel does, and to allow Jews to more completely infiltrate all governments of the world.
    I think that even the Khazarians were also merely Diaspora Jews who were just called back into the fold of the Jews when it became expedient and safe for them to be readmitted publicly as Jews. However, Jews are what they are, and even Semitic DNA really has nothing to do with their real identity, as nobody is their flesh, no soul can be identified just by their external DNA covering the soul. And we all know what great actors Jews are, the greatest chameleons of all.
    Having said all that, I think all souls are originally the same quality of substance, from God (not Yahweh) but that some have just turned away from the real Godhead for such a long time they have turned really dark, lacking the light of God within them, that would, if it were present, be the essence of any true spiritual wisdom within their forgetful souls, and the Jews are some of the darkest souls right now, but in the end, I think God does not eternally reject even a single soul or even place a single soul in any eternal hell, as we are all expanded parts of Him, and this entire world and the material minds and bodies in it are merely holographic projections ultimately created by God’s maya potency, like a multi-dimensional cinema show all around us, in which we are not actually actors at this time, as we only begin to actually act under our own volition when we qualify to leave this dark world and reawake in the transcendental spiritual dimension. Right now, in this material world, this dream world of maya, only the vague, barely conscious and dark Godless yearnings of each fallen soul are reflected in the actions of the dreamlike material minds, words and actions of those in this world. God’s material maya potency is ultimately the only actor in this world.
    Even the Jews themselves have a little clue as to the truth of this, though they cannot actually understand it, and the words relating to that understanding were probably stolen from a far older culture when they hijacked them and put them in the Torah scriptures of the Old Testament. If they actually understood the real meaning of these words, they might be just become slightly nicer people, but the rest of their so-called scriptures undermine and destroy that understanding anyway.
    Isaiah 45:7 American King James Version
    ‘I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.’
    In the above words, God reveals Himself as the only actor in this dimension, whilst we souls all watch on just as if in a dream, the mere reflection of our fallen spiritual desires, whilst we misidentify ourselves with this flesh, being projected by God Himself as the words of ‘our’ bodies, the thoughts within ‘our’ physical brains, and the actions of ‘our’ material bodies.
    The political state of Israel and the Judaic death cult need to be gone though, one way or the other, before what the Jews will for us is actually acted out in this dream world of maya, just as the vast majority of sleepy and uncaring souls has allowed, through sheer complacency and fear of offending the Jews in power. A far nicer ‘dream’ would be our reality here if the vast majority of people woke up a little more and were more responsible before God in the inner desires of their souls.

  12. I am the worlds foremost expert on Jews.
    I find their Jewishness repugnant.
    You and I both know Jews are fundamental liars. That they lie mercilessly even to themselves. We both know Jews lie about everything. Meaning by everything literally “every single thing”. You can’t have a simple truth from a Jew. Even or the most insignificant thing. I guess there must be some psychiatric, anthropological and sociological explanations for that lying compulsive behavior. There’s no more racist and disgusting slogan than “the chosen people.” It looks like derived from that slogan, they are taught and trained in the synagogues not to try and do anything but oppress peoples. For that purpose they lie again and again. Jews give God a bad name.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading