holocaust

THE FORWARD

As media attention focuses on the question of whether any of the Paris attackers entered Europe as refugees, I offer a few thoughts.

First, it is important to recognize there is a risk that a small number of extremists might infiltrate refugee flows. Advocates for generous asylum policies — of which I am one — should acknowledge this. Addressing it calls for appropriate resources to be devoted to the challenge. Moreover, screening will never be 100% successful. It never is.

The broader question, however, is whether fear of a few evil men (or women) will lead us to sacrifice our basic moral commitment to fellow human beings fleeing war, oppression and deprivation. I, for one, am not prepared to grant ISIS a veto over refugee policy or humanitarian obligations.

I am equally confident that the overwhelming majority of refugees will, if given a chance, prove to be productive members of their new societies who are grateful for the asylum they have been granted. Almost all of the research on Western refugee absorption shows net, long-term positive effects.

Goodness knows that multicultural Montreal, for example, is a much better place for having accepted those fleeing war and instability in Lebanon, Haiti, Rwanda, DR Congo and many other places besides. There certainly wouldn’t be such an excellent choice of shawarma restaurants without them.

During World War II there was also a real risk that among those fleeing war and Nazi oppression there might be spies and fifth columnists. Indeed, some were.

I am enormously grateful, however, that fear of that possibility did not lead the authorities to turn back a young boy who arrived in England with his parents in May 1940. He had made a desperate and a perilous journey from the Netherlands by road and sea, a bullet hole in his jacket from being strafed by the Luftwaffe en route.

Had he been turned back, I might not be here to write this.

That young boy was my father.

Rex Brynen is a professor of political science at McGill University.

3 thoughts on “ALL ROADS LEAD TO AUSCHWITZ : In Aftermath of Paris Attacks, a Lesson from the Holocaust”
  1. “a bullet hole in his jacket”. Nice touch. I have to remember that next time I write a story.

  2. It is a common but unacceptable ploy to argue trends based on individual experience.
    All it takes is one rotten apple in the barrel for the others to be affected.
    One; in the case of Paris they had eight.
    As for refugees, there is always a price to pay by the indigents for being trampled on.
    For more details in your continent, ask the present day descendants of the Inuit.
    In the case of refugee movement anywhere it is more constructive to look behind and ask who is doing the pushing. The perpetrators are invariably the same low life.
    As for multiculturalism, there is nothing more vibrant and stimulating in a community.
    Sadly we fall a little short of that Utopian state.
    Finally, the best ever shawarma-and hummus-are to be had from a roadside shack just outside Jizan on the road south to Yemen. The area is quite safe with no refugee movement.
    It must be, we are hearing nothing from the MSM of the carnage being conducted in Yemen.
    Did I mention how subjective individual experience tends to be.

  3. How many people would you be willing to let die to cut off refugee programs?

    Is Montreal better off? Is Dearborn? Is Detroit?

    You will not answer these questions. Just evasion.

    It’s your opinion that im racist. Your saying it because I advocate white interests. Racist is used to stigmatize white people who advocate for their own interests. Anti racist is anti white.

    ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

    ed note–no one here is in favor of illegal immigration, anywhere. Not only have we never made any statement or intimation in favor of it, we have repeatedly, REPEATEDLY, made it clear we are against it.

    But this fact–and it is precisely that, a fact–seems to escape the notice/awareness of people such as you who with an ax to grind. You are playing tug of war with people who are not tugging against you, and time and time again, you fall flat on your ass and make fools of yourselves with inane, irrational, and baseless statements such as these.

    ‘Anti-racist’ does not mean ‘anti-white’. The equivielant is to say that a mouse and an elephant are the same animal because they both happen to walk on 4 legs. Rather, it is a phrase which people such as you memorize by wrote because it sounds good, even though it contains no reason or logic within it.

    whites–like every other demographic group–have the right to advocate for their best interests, and they do. Whites run the world. They represent the most powerful, wealthy and influential group out of any other demographic–ANYWHERE. Where people such as you lose the argument however is in painting yourselves as the perpetual victims, just as Jews do, while making sure to gloss over those elephants in the room that negate your argument.

    As far as the immigrants (or at least those fleeing white armies that are destroying their homes in places such as Iraq, Libya, Syria, etc) get your white militaries out of their countries and perhaps they will stop fleeing to yours.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading