Syrian leader says US president will ‘quickly push’ for solution to issue, says Israeli pullout a precondition for a security deal with Israel.
ed note–another eye-opener that every war-weary Gentile with a vested interest in his/her own future survival needs to read, understand, and take deeply to heart.
Firsto, ladies and Gentile-men, it can be understood and accepted that Al Sharaa would never have risked doing damage to the cooperative relationship he has with the one person who shares his plans of rebuilding Syria, i.e. the POTUS, by making up out of thin air a statement such as ‘Trump supports our demands for Israeli withdrawal from sovereign Syrian territory’.
Furthermore, at least as of the moment of this writing, there are no denials coming out of the White House with regards to Al Sharaa’s statements concerning the President’s support for Israeli withdrawal…
Which means, ladies and Gentile-men, that indeed Al Sharaa and the POTUS discussed his putting pressure on the terrorist Jewish state to withdraw from Syria and the President agreed to it.
Now, here we have in front of us a conundrum, ladies and Gentile-men, which is as follows…
There is no doubt, NO DOUBT WHATSOFREAKINGEVER, that the Jews are 666% opposed to the idea of giving up the Syrian land they have stolen, and are apocalyptically-furious that the POTUS would even HINT at agreeing to such a demand from the Syrian President.
HOWEVER, we are told by all sorts of ‘experts’ on a daily basis that POTUS DJT is nothing more than a ‘puppet’ for the Jews and in particular, for Beelzu-Bibi Netanyahu…
So, how can this be, L&G?
How can POTUS DJT be ‘a slave to the Jews’ and yet, at the same time, be doing things that the Jews oppose with 666% of their diabolically-deranged collective consciousness?
It can’t be both, fellow Gentiles, it is either one way or the other, but not both…
Which means, fellow Gentiles, that if indeed POTUS DJT is acting independently and is not some ‘puppet’ being controlled by powerful Jewish interests, then all of those who say otherwise are, at the very LEAST, ‘suspect’ in their ‘analysis’ and should be as ignored as one would ignore some grifter on the streets of a major American city selling ‘genuine’ Rolex watches that he has hidden under his coat for a mere $5.
Times of Israel
Syria’s leader Ahmed al-Sharaa said Monday that US President Donald Trump supports his insistence on a complete Israeli withdrawal from Syrian territory as a condition for a comprehensive security deal between the long-warring neighboring countries.
Speaking to The Washington Post after becoming the first Syrian leader to meet a US president in Washington, Sharaa said Trump would ‘push as quickly as possible in order to reach a solution for this.’
Israeli troops took up several positions in southwestern Syria following the fall of the Bashar Assad regime last year, in what Jerusalem said is a ‘temporary security measure’.
While Washington is keen to eventually normalize ties between Israel and Syria, the latter is aiming first at a security deal, with the condition that Israeli troops withdraw from its territory.
Sharaa said that during his Monday meeting with the US president, ‘we found that Mr. Trump supports our perspective as well, and he will push as quickly as possible in order to reach a solution for this.’
‘Israel has always claimed that it has concerns about Syria because it is afraid of the threats that the Iranian militias and Hezbollah represent,’ Shara said, referring to the Lebanese terror group. ‘We are the ones who expelled those forces out of Syria.’
Sharaa also said an Israeli demand that the territory south of Damascus be demilitarized is unreasonable, and will cause chaos.
‘If this demilitarized zone was used by some parties as a launching pad for hitting Israel, who is going to be responsible for that?’ he said.
Sharaa charged that Israel’s invasion of Syria comes from ‘expansionist ambitions’ and not from ‘security concerns’.
‘Israel occupied the Golan Heights in order to ‘protect’ Israel, and now they are imposing conditions in the south of Syria in order to ‘protect’ the Golan Heights,’ he said ironically, referring to an area in northern Israel that Jerusalem retained control of after the 1967 Six Day War, and annexed in the 1980s. ‘So after a few years, maybe they will occupy the center of Syria in order to protect the south of Syria. Eventually they will reach Munich on that pathway.’
There is a ‘good distance to go’ before Syria can reach an agreement with Israel, Sharaa said.
‘To reach a final agreement, Israel must withdraw to their pre-December 8 borders,’ he said, referring to the date of the fall of the Assad regime and the simultaneous Israeli advance into the buffer zone between the two countries and beyond.