obama1

United Nations Security Council reaches resolution on Syria, but makes no mention of Assad; Obama also signs into law new tougher sanctions against Hezbollah.

ed note–consider for a moment the audacity of it all, and imagine what the American reaction would be if Russia, China, and the rest of the world’s nations decided to do what the US, I$rael, and the West have done with regards to Syria, which is to arm, train, fund, and support terrorist groups blowing the place up for the express purpose of overthrowing the US government.

Haaretz

President Barack Obama said Syrian President Bashar Assad “has lost (his) legitimacy” and will have to “leave,” as the UN Security Council approved a resolution outlining a peace process for Syria involving talks by representatives of the Damascus government and the opposition, but said nothing on the critical issue of what role Assad will play.

“I think that Assad is going to have to leave in order for the country to stop the bloodletting and for all the parties to be able to move forward in a non-sectarian way. He has lost legitimacy,” Obama said.

The president said diplomats need to find a way to create a political transition that allows Assad’s allies like Russia and Iran to ensure “that their equities are respected” in Syria.

The UN resolution acknowledges that the peace process will not end the conflict because it bars “terrorist groups” operating in the country, including the Islamic State and Al-Nusra Front, from participating in a cease-fire.

Obama has trod carefully around the subject, and though for years he has demanded Assad resign, no political transition has ever been agreed upon, and Russia’s move to defend Assad has complicated diplomatic efforts to find a way for Assad to give up power and resolve the country’s civil war.

Obama has drawn fire on his approach to Syria from Republican presidential candidates who say he has left a leadership vacuum that Russian President Vladimir Putin has sought to fill.

On Friday, Obama also signed into law legislation that increases sanctions on Hezbollah, the White House said.

“This strong, bipartisan bill intensifies pressure against the Hezbollah terrorist organization and provides the administration additional tools with which to target Hezbollah’s financial lifeblood,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said in a statement.

Obama appeared in the White House press briefing room for a year-end news conference and talked tough about the prospects of defeating Islamic State militants who control broad swathes of territory in Syria and Iraq.

UN resolution

Foreign ministers from 17 countries met on and off for more than five hours to overcome divisions on the resolution’s text.

The resolution has been described as a rare gesture of unity on the Syria peace process by a council often deeply divided on the crisis.

The draft resolution, obtained by The Associated Press, requests that UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon convene representatives of the Syrian government and opposition “to engage in formal negotiations on a political transition process on an urgent basis, with a target of early January 2016 for the initiation of talks.”

Within six months, the process should establish “credible, inclusive and non-sectarian governance,” with UN-supervised “free and fair elections” to be held within 18 months.

The draft calls the transition Syrian-led and Syrian-owned, stressing that the “Syrian people will decide the future of Syria.”

The draft also says cease-fire efforts should move forward in parallel with the talks, and it asks Ban to report within a month of the resolution’s adoption on a way to monitor the cease-fire.

The draft notes that the cease-fire “will not apply to offensive or defensive actions” against groups considered terrorist organizations, meaning that airstrikes by Russia, France and the U.S.-led coalition apparently would not be affected.

Meanwhile Friday, some 20 foreign ministers tackled those and other difficult issues for a possible end to Syria’s civil war, including sorting out which Syrian groups will represent the opposition in peace talks in the new year.

Jordanian Foreign Minister Nasser Judeh said he presented lists submitted from each country of groups they consider terrorist organizations. He said some countries “sent 10, 15, 20 names” and others more.

“Now I think there will be follow-up steps in terms of countries meeting again to set criteria which will help filter the list,” said Judeh, whose country is tasked with putting the final list together.

5 thoughts on “As UN Endorses Syria Plan, Obama Says Assad Will Probably Have to Go”
  1. What a confused mass of deception and lies is fed to us by the media. All along the ‘official’ US position has been that “Assad must go”. However, Kerry was recently reported as saying that the US is not pursuing regime change in Syria, while Putin on the other hand was reported to say that he has “no objection” to Assad stepping down. (Of course, he would also have “no objection” to Assad NOT stepping down). Now Obama is again reported to say that Assad “probably” must go.
    Obama is reported as saying that Assad has “lost his legitimacy”. When exactly did that happen, and who determines his “legitimacy”? Do “western” powers get to determine his “legitimacy”, or is it the Syrian voters who make that decision? If it’s the Syrian voters (as it most assuredly is) then Assad has definitely NOT “lost his legitimacy”. They have overwhelmingly voted for him all along – and I have no doubt that if Assad should decide to run for another term he would be overwhelmingly approved once again. The vast majority of the Syrian populace love the man and his SECULAR government (decidedly not-sectarian, despite the continuing lies told about him). The objection the “west” has is that the small minority who dislike the government of Assad is not permitted to prevail over the vast majority who approve of him! So much for “democracy” in the “west”!

  2. “ed note–consider for a moment the audacity of it all, and imagine what the American reaction would be if Russia, China, and the rest of the world’s nations decided to do what the US, I$rael, and the West have done with regards to Syria, which is to arm, train, fund, and support terrorist groups blowing the place up for the express purpose of overthrowing the US government”./////…………… PLEASE OH PLEASE…

  3. This is all about oil, it started when Syria rejected a Saudi proposal for a pipeline. Syria is a SECULAR Country that embraces all the various religions. They are fighting Western backed militias who are very well paid. Yankee go home!

  4. Antoinette…. This is about world hegemony. If you want to go to the head of it, it would be more accurate to say it’s all about money, as in control of the world’s money. Fiat debt money enslaves us all through the inflation/deflation manipulation…. but even that isn’t the head. The head of this beast is the people that control the banking/military/oil cartel. It isn’t separable.

  5. Thanks Russ for already saying what I was going to say – better than I would have said it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading