Britain’s Chief Rabbi, Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis, denounced accusations of genocide in Gaza as being motivated ‘only by hostility to the one and only Jewish state’.
ed note–as always, lots of ‘must knows’ that every war-weary Gentile with a vested interest in his/her own future survival needs to understand about all of this.
Firsto, ladies and Gentile-men, an important quote worth considering–
‘There is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, nor any secret or mystery that will not come to light and be made known…’
The above important quote comes from the Man of Steel, Jesus Christ, King of the Gentiles, in describing what ‘future days’ will bring and what people can expect to witness when these ‘future days’ do indeed arrive, which they most certainly have.
And if anything ‘hidden’ has been ‘disclosed’, and if any ‘mysteries’ have ceased being ‘mysterious’, especially in the last few years, it is WHY the Jews have been hated throughout history and why there has been, and (just as importantly) always WILL be this thing known as ‘anti-Semitism’.
The ‘posture’ on the part of the Gentile towards the Hebrew, Israelite, Judah-ite, Jew, whatever combination of consonants and vowels one chooses to use in describing them, has always, ALWAYS, been an autonomic, reflexive reaction rooted in self-defense, no different than the manner in which a deer flees for its life when a wolf or other predator comes into its environs. There is not, never has been and NEVER WILL BE anything abnormal, immoral, or unjust about the misnamed immunological reaction known as ‘anti-Semitism’, no more than it is abnormal, immoral, or unjust for an otherwise healthy person to sneeze, cough, or vomit when a dangerous, foreign organism has entered and infected the body.
The last 2 years and what has been the Satanic black mass taking place in Gaza on the part of the Jews has once again revealed them for what they are and for what they were described being by the one man who knew them better than anyone, Jesus Christ, who was quite clear in the descriptive language he used when characterising them as–
‘CHILDREN OF THEIR FATHER, THE DEVIL, SENT TO DO THE LUSTS OF THEIR FATHER…’
And certainly, if ever the ‘lusts’ of their father, the Devil, were made clear, it has been the Genocide and mass murder which the Jewish state, with near unanimous support from the entire Jewish population worldwide, has perpetuated since Oct. 7, 2023.
Now, the manner in which all of this nasty business relates to the article below, nota bene the following–
The real reason why the deceptive ‘rebbe’ opposes the use of the word ‘genocide’ in describing the deliberate mass murder of hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children in Gaza has nothing to do with the ‘legal definitions’ associated with the word ‘genocide’, but rather with 2 main items which he does not mention but which, rest assured, are at the very center of his argument.
Firsto, within the perverse and diabolically-possessed mental processes taking place within the Jewish brain, Gentiles are not human beings.
Rather, as once infamously pontificated by Israel’s former Chief Sephardic rabbi Ovadia Yosef shortly before he died and went home to hell for the big ‘family reunion’, Gentiles are no more than ‘animals made to appear as humans so as to best serve the Jews.’
Therefore, fellow Gentiles, since we are not humans, then mass murdering us is not, technically speaking, ‘Genocide’.
Now, rest assured, if Gaza were populated by a mere HANDFUL of Jews instead of Gentiles, and a mere FRACTION of this ‘handful’ found themselves on the wrong end of the gun barrel, then as sure as shinola, the rebbe would ABSOLUTELY condemn what was taking place as a ‘Genocide’, given that it is Jews who are being killed and thus, necessitating every resource existing on the entire planet in bringing it to an immediate end.
Indeed, ladies and Gentile-men, just as Jesus Christ, the Man of Steel and King of the Gentiles stated in the clearest of language that–
‘There is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, nor any secret or mystery that will not come to light and be made known…’
–and therefore, embrace your ‘anti-Semitism’ as you would welcome a fever that has been raised by your immunological system to save you, because as uncomfortable as it may (temporarily) be, it is a gift from your Creator who wants to see you not only survive, but indeed, to thrive.
Israel National News
The Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth, Sir Ephraim Mirvis, has criticised the use of the term ‘genocide’ to describe Israel’s military actions in Gaza, arguing that it ‘diminishes the gravity of the word’ and turns ‘humanity’s gravest crime’ into a mere political insult.
In an article written for The Telegraph, Sir Ephraim stated that the accusation is made too readily today. He wrote: ‘Today it takes almost no thought to repeat the accusation that Israel has committed ‘genocide’.’
‘Some repeat it from a place of singular hostility toward the world’s only Jewish state. But whatever the motivation, the result is the same: this gravest of crimes is invoked casually, without due regard for the weight of the word itself.’
He further explained: ‘In an age when hyperbole dominates our discourse and outrage is rewarded with clicks, campaigners reach instinctively for the most extreme language available. Faced with images on social media of immense, tragic suffering in Gaza, journalists, academics and celebrities understandably feel compelled to speak out.’
‘Yet the race to linguistic escalation has consequences. The ubiquity of a term is often wrongly understood as evidence of its veracity. And some terms have a meaning that must remain protected at all costs, and ‘Genocide’ is one of them.’
Sir Ephraim emphasised the legal definition of genocide, which requires intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group. He said: ‘It is why Britain and her allies are not accused of genocide for our strategic bombing of Nazi Germany, despite the hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians who were killed. Intent is the moral and legal hinge. The clearest evidence that Israel did not intend to destroy the people of Gaza is that it did not in fact do so.’
Describing the conflict as one that ‘Israel did not seek, nor start’, he said Israel’s goals have been the return of hostages and the disarmament of Hamas – a group he noted has sought the total destruction of Israel. He added: ‘If Hamas lays down its arms, there will be no fighting and no suffering. If Israel were to lay down its arms, there would be no Israel.’
The Chief Rabbi also criticised some human rights organisations, saying they ‘appear to revel in misappropriating the term genocide’ by expanding its definition and engaging in ‘a truly troubling moral deceit.’
He acknowledged the suffering in Gaza, stating: ‘The tragic suffering of Palestinians abounds’ and ‘no decent person could fail to be moved by it or wish to see its end’. However, he argued there is no evidence of ‘systematic massacres, mass executions, or the targeted killing of civilians as a matter of policy’.
Sir Ephraim warned that loose use of the term harms the concept itself: ‘When academics, activists, faith leaders and public figures declare, with unshakeable certainty, that genocide has occurred, they do something far more destructive than merely repeat a falsehood. They trivialise the very concept they claim to defend. What language is left for the Rohingya, expelled en masse, systematically raped and slaughtered? For the Uyghurs, subjected to mass internment, forced sterilisation and cultural erasure? For the ethnically targeted killing and mass rape in West Darfur? To invoke the term ‘genocide’ as an accusation against Israel is to strip it of its true meaning, reducing humanity’s gravest crime to a political insult.’
He concluded: ‘The suffering of innocent people demands empathy, accountability and a genuine commitment to preventing future conflict. But to level the charge of genocide against Israel is to commit a moral inversion whose casualties include not only Israelis, but the very idea of human rights itself.’