minnie_burqa1

YNET – New modesty campaign sparks social media protest after appearing on 20 Egged buses in the capital. Advertiser says message directed at haredi public, while bus company refuses to intervene in campaign’s content.

A new modesty campaign in Jerusalem is reigniting religious wars in the capital after huge ads reading “Short clothing shortens life” appeared last week on about 20 Egged buses in the city.

The ads included a caption indicating that the campaign’s purpose is the “transcendence of the soul of the Har Nof righteous” – the worshippers murdered at a terror attack in a Jerusalem synagogue about two months ago.

The campaign sparked a series of condemnations on social networks, and secular activists filed complaints with the Cnaan Media company, which is responsible for the bus ads.

The campaign’s initiator appeared unimpressed by the growing chaos. “It’s causing a mess?” he told Ynet. “Good, let it cause a mess, before we find ourselves in an even bigger mess.”

Campaign’s goal: Self-examination

He added that the disaster at the Har Nof synagogue forced every religious Jew to engage in self-examination, and that he believed the ultra-Orthodox public should be encouraged to be strict about issues like modesty and unity.

“It’s clear that those who were murdered did not receive a punishment they deserved,” he said. “They were righteous people. They woke up to pray at 6 am. They are public victims, and it happened to them because of us, because of our acts. A person cannot say that he doesn’t care. It’s cruelty. When you deteriorate, it’s God’s severe judgment which has the final word.”

As for the protests over the statement that “short clothing shortens life,” the advertiser said: “Can anyone say for certain that it’s not true?”

He stressed, however, that the message was directed at the haredi public, which believes in these values, rather than at seculars who were not educated on these values, although he added that “modesty will protect all of us – even those who are now complaining.

“I requested that the signs would only appear on the lines serving the public who really understands it but it trying to escape it. If we find it on the seculars’ buses, I will ask them to remove the signs. That was not the intention. It’s first and foremost my business. If I’ve already invested my own money, the advertising should be focused and reach the target audience.”

Egged spokesman Ron Ratner said in response that the bus was part of the public domain, like “a street on wheels,” and therefore the company did not see it fit to intervene in the content advertised on the bus by an external concessionaire, except in radical cases.

“We live in a tolerant democratic society, and as long as the ads don’t harm the state, its symbols or public sentiment in an intolerable manner – we shall not intervene,” Ratner said.

He estimated that the protests was being led by interested parties and was affected by the upcoming elections, and added that “it is up to the Cnaan company to decide about the matter.”

Ohad Givli, CEO of Cnaan Media, which owns the franchise for advertising on Egged buses in Jerusalem, said in response that the company did not necessarily agree with all the messages appearing on its signs, but that it did not see it fit to censor the ads or ask the advertiser to change the wording, as long as the ads did not offend a certain public in a radical manner or include expressions of racism.

In this case, he said, the ads convey a general message which encourages modest clothing and does not distinguish between different sectors or between the sexes, and therefore there is no room to intervene.

5 thoughts on “Bus ads in Jerusalem: Short clothing shortens life”
  1. Return to medieval times… I will never accept that… it would be denying all what our great-great-great-grand mas, great-great-grand-mas, great grand-mas, grand-mas and moms and the millions of other women around the globe have done for us to be free from this stupid ignominy of considering women as a wrap candy, as less than a second class citizen, as lower value than an animal. This is ridiculous!

  2. Xplorex: do you think that women now are free? Wrap candy vs. naked candy? Are women happier now than they were, say in the 50s or earlier?

  3. @Sabba… No, I don’t think that we are free… yet… and women are still exploit in many domains but… going back deeper in medieval slavery, and walking under a tent, educating daughters to be obedient and crawling before men, not being educated, passing their life emprisonned under thick clothes or in a dark house will certainly not help. Women still have to reach a balance… it went to being too covered to too naked… when the pendulum will swing back, balance will come. But the most important here is to continue to “fight”… not to have the right of wearing a bikini or not but to be seen as a human being and an equal to men. Women will never be men as well as men will never be women… we are complement but we all need to get respect.

    It is a long journey but now, more and more women are working in well established jobs, have business, are recognized world wide in their work and it is great… what I am against is not wearing a scarf or a longer skirt, it is this way to control and diminish women into notingness.

    Yes, we have still lot of work to do, it is far from to be perfect… maybe some women are at the extreme side of sex slavery and like to offer their bodies openly but it is far from to be the majority… most of us are working hard to get respect and get high qualifications in our work… and we are proud of it.

    That is what I meant, Sabba

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading