Former Special Prosecutor Ken Starr–'Eerie Echoes' Between Lewinsky Probe And Mueller Investigation Of Trump

ed note–for those suffering from memory loss or else who otherwise just can’t seem to connect the dots as to what Ken Starr is saying here, please allow us–

Bill Clinton was chosen by Judea, Inc to vanquish George H. W. Bush in the 1992 elections, and while GHWB  was the Jews’ favorite Goy leader for invading/destroying Iraq, he did however make 2 fatal errors that cost him a 2nd term–

1. He refused to go any further than driving the Iraqis out of Kuwait, thus stopping/cutting short the ‘Clash of Civilizations’ which the Jews were demanding but which his idiot son did choose to re-ignite, 

and

2. Threatened to veto Congress’ plan to approve $10 billion in loan guarantees to the Jewish state until Israel agreed to come to the negotiating table in Bush’s ‘Peace deal’ with the Palestinians taking place in Madrid.

Doubtless that Bill Clinton promised Israel the moon and the stars if he had the Jews’ help in getting elected, but then, upon assuming office, demonstrated immediately that he had pulled a fast one, first by refusing to pick up where GHWB left of vis Israel’s demands for war in the Middle East and then, 

drum role please–

Pushing forward his ‘peace deal’ between Israel and the Palestinians.

As a reward for his actions, Clinton then found himself on the receiving end of Judea’s Inc’s gratitude by being blackmailed 24/7 via the much-publicized details involving his illicit extramarital affair with a nice Jewish girl named Monica Lewinsky and then impeached, and it was none other than Benjamin Netanyahu who functioned as a major gear in all of this through his deep contacts not only within the Deep State in the US but as well the JMSM who hounded Clinton on a daily basis–

–In much the same way that the Deep State and the JMSM are now hounding Donald Trump and threatening him with…

drum role please–

IMPEACHMENT.

The fact that Ken Starr–point man for Judea, Inc in putting the legal screws (no pun intended) to Bill Clinton as ‘special counsel’–is remarking on the ‘eerie echos’ existing between what he personally oversaw with Bill Clinton and the present hurricane threatening to engulf Trump should not be seen as mere coincidence, for  indeed they are rooted in the very same protocols–Israel punishing a US President who–

1. Is refusing to move forward with the ‘clash of civilizations,’

and 

2. Making an example of a US President who dares push forward any ‘peace deal’ between the Jooz and the beleaguered Palestinians that would result in containing and curtailing the feral Jewish state from gobbling up all the land (and oil) in the Middle East.

npr.org

Kenneth Starr, the independent counsel whose recommendations led to the 1998 impeachment of then-President Bill Clinton, tells NPR that “eerie echoes” of his probe two decades ago can be heard in the current investigation of President Trump.

Starr, who is promoting a new book about his 4 1/2-year investigation of Clinton titled Contempt: A Memoir of the Clinton Investigation — also told Morning Edition host Steve Inskeep that he doesn’t approve of Trump’s public disparagement of special counsel Robert Mueller and Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

“The comparisons will be intriguing as we proceed because there are eerie echoes to what happened 20 years ago,” Starr says, referring to Mueller’s investigation of possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Starr’s investigation was charged initially with looking into a failed Arkansas real-estate deal known as Whitewater, on which the Clintons lost money, as well as the collapse of a savings-and-loan in the state. However, the investigation expanded before ultimately focusing on an affair between the president and a young White House intern, Monica Lewinsky.

It was charges relating to the Lewinsky affair — including lying under oath and obstruction of justice — on which Clinton was impeached by the House but later acquitted by the Senate.

However, Starr is quick to draw distinctions between his investigation of Clinton and Mueller’s investigation of Trump.

“[At] least as far as we know Donald Trump has not lied under oath, as far as we know, he’s not intimidated witnesses, [and] as far as we know — in my view — he has not obstructed justice,” Starr says.

Asked about the president’s numerous tweets that “publicly run down the special counsel,” Starr says he thinks they are “inconsistent with the rule of law.”

In Contempt, Starr describes the Clintons as “fundamentally dishonest.” Asked about Trump’s track record of honesty, Starr says he’s “not going to opine on the president.”

“Let’s get all the facts in. I have all the facts in with respect to Bill and Hillary and that’s what Contempt is all about,” he says. “But I do think that there are echoes. We want our president to be honest, and we especially want the president to be honest under oath.

“We’re not talking about the morality of truth telling, we’re talking about the rule of law.”

Starr writes that Clinton-era Attorney General Janet Reno failed to publicly support his work as independent counsel, but as Inskeep points out, she didn’t “publicly trash” his work, as Trump has with Sessions.

“I think it’s wrong. The president shouldn’t be doing that, and I have condemned it in an op-ed piece in The Washington Post,” Starr says.