YNET – On Friday, May 15, a convoy of about 12 bright black vehicles left Beirut along with a number of off-road vehicles packed with uniformed fighters. The convoy turned east and drove quickly towards the Syrian border. They didn’t raise too much attention among the passersby: Similar convoys of Hezbollah members have been entering the bleeding battlefields in Syria for the past two years. Only some of them will get to see Lebanon again.
why didnt IRAN use its leverage during nuke negotiations to take some of the heat of Syria? Get NATO/West to back off?
…”It’s unclear how reliable this inquiry is, as there is still no reliable technology allowing the detection of tunnels – apart from some parts of the southern border, where the defense establishment is building a seismic fence against tunnels.”
Archeologists have used ground penetrating radar/subsurface radar imaging for years. Wouldn’t this be used to find tunnels? This whole tunnel discussion appears to be a diversion and a method to terrorize the Israelis and to keep their minds wrapped around their eternal victimhood.
In this abstract, underground tunnels were found in Ukraine in an early Christian monastery using this technology back in 1998: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/808090/?reload=true
In July 2016 JPost reported that Yossi Langotsky (a geologist) had, since 2005, urged the IDF to use “geophysics sensors, exactly as they are used to discover oil and gas deep underground and undersea.” Langotsky stated these sensors could be “purchased from the shelves,” but he was rebuffed because the IDF wanted to “reinvent the wheel”. This meant taxing the Israelis while trying to reinvent the wheel.
http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Analysis-How-Israel-undermined-the-tunnel-threat-462662
Also, regarding this paragraph of the above article:
“There are those in the IDF who assert that nonetheless, the Second Lebanon War created serious deterrence in Hezbollah from attacking Israel. This deterrence, those sources say, is the reason why Hezbollah is not fulfilling its angry promises of revenge. This is of course a realistic option, but there are those in the intelligence community who say there is a different reason:..,” wherein the article goes on to state that Iran is most interested in protection of its nuclear facilities by Hezbollah. Could it be the nuclear facilities agreement was to buy time for the IDF and Israel to be more prepared for Lebanon 3.0, and to soften up Hezbollah beforehand via its fighting against Israeli proxies, ISIS and Al-Nusra?
According to this article, Hezbollah in Lebanon had lost 1,300 fighters (up to that point) and was becoming something of an ‘establishment’ army alongside the Lebanese army which included Nasrallah’s ‘rejects’ who are looking to fight and a have steady salary. Could this mean that Hezbollah is becoming less radicalized and possibly less of a problem for Israel in the long run?