ed note–an interesting and important read for several reasons.
Firsto, as we are wont to say here on a regular basis, one cannot understand the state of the world today, a state of near-total disrepair and desolation, without plugging into this equation the over-arching and dominant role which the organized forces of anti-Gentilism play in all of this.
The followers of Torah Judah-ism, the ‘Children of Israel’ as they fawningly love to refer to themselves, are not just some outlying minority of disenfranchised people ‘who shall dwell alone’ like the Amish. Within every major gear running society today, the HONEST observer of modern political intrigue will see and acknowledge in Kristol clear clarity the fact that indeed in the driver’s seat (or very near to it) of every major function of influence including politics, finance, media, etc, there is someone from the tribe of Judah making those decisions that result in life or death for not just millions, but indeed for BILLIONS of people.
Secondly, and again, as we say here often on this humble little informational endeavor, the entire phenomenon of Judah-ism and the application of its protocols is something that is shrouded in mystery, obscurity, and deceit. Like any underground criminal brotherhood, its members are very tightly-knit, ply their criminal business in a way that escapes public awareness and understanding, and, as former AIPAC executive Steve Rosen said in describing the manner by which that aforementioned spy organization operates, exists as a ‘nightflower that flourishes in the dark but dies in the light of day’.
Having said that, it is important to note several important ‘protocols’ as they relate to the following ‘decree’ by our deranged and delusional rabbi.
The fact that he (at least by appearances) has ‘doctrinal problems’ with Ben Shapiro, the darling Jew of the conservative right, means very little in the bigger picture, no different in essence than if an alligator could read, write and speak and who had penned an unflattering OpEd about a crocodile in the swamp who had become something of a ‘star’. The 2 creatures, despite certain superficial appearances, are basically the same dangerous and destructive animal with the exact same natures and the exact same MO.
More important than that however are those protocols which the Gentile must consider if he/she entertains the slightest hope of getting through this Apocalypse-in-real-time taking place at the moment.
If there is one enduring motif arising out of the story of Jesus Christ, it is that of Judas and the role he played as a spy for the Sin-a-gog of Satan. He ate with Jesus and the 12, traveled with them, witnessed all the good works and good words that were part of Jesus’ mission, but in the end, when called to find his ‘Jewish soul’ and to do his duty for his Judah-ism by bringing Jesus’ mission to an end, he did it.
And likewise with the Ben Shapiros, Mark Levins and others who talk a good talk when in the company of the Christian right but who are there as the great, great gandchildren of Judas Iscariot and operating under the very same auspices–to steer Gentile energies in ways that benefit the Sin-a-gog of Satan and its animating spiritual energy, its Torah Judah-ism.
Now, as to the piece itself and what it has to say about the business of institutionalized child sacrifice otherwise known as Abortion on demand–
Our deranged and delusional rabbi is correct–Judah-ism is not just 100% pro-abortion, but 666%, and it derives this moral approbation for the deliberate murder of unborn human beings not from the Tal-mood, but indeed, from the Torah, and specifically from the ‘law of Moses’ that billions of brain-drained Christians believe to be every bit as holy as the words and works of Jesus Christ Himself.
If there was one issue, ONE ISSUE ALONE, that had as much as a snowball’s chance in hell of waking Christians up to the dangers which the followers of Judah-ism pose to them and of making them aware of the fact that the philosophy espoused by Jesus Christ vs that of the rabbis are as different and distinct from each other as are the natures of the sheep and the wolf, then this issue alone, institutionalized child murder morally prescribed by the religion of the Jews, should do it.
Sad to say however, that rather than coming to this awareness, today’s Christians, instead of recognizing the Ugly Truth for what it irrevocably is and always will be, will instead flock to the mind poison of pretenders such as the aforementioned Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin who do indeed know how to spin a good yarn and cast a good spell in furthering the interests of the Sin-a-gog of Satan to which they have pledged their Jewish souls.
Rabbi Phil Cohen for the Times of Israel
Ben Shapiro, the kippah-wearing conservative pundit, undoubtedly finds himself in anti-abortion heaven along with the many thousands of ‘pro-lifers’ who are reveling in ‘Dobbs’, the recent Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade. Laws have been passed and are continuing to be written shutting down the practice of abortion around the country.
As many as twenty states have or will have such laws in place with great rapidity, as people all over America, especially women, see what they viewed as a fifty-year-old fundamental right removed from their grasp on the notion that the Constitution of the United States does not protect a woman’s right to control her own body.
I’m fascinated with Mr. Shapiro’s kippah, a small black one that sits on the back of his head. Perhaps I shouldn’t take that public symbol of his Jewishness too seriously, as I have no corroborating data that indicates how he honors that symbol of his religious tradition. Is he observant in any distinguishable way? Does he observe Shabbat? Kashrut? Tefilln? Tsom Gedaliah? Does he have basic awareness of the values of the Jewish tradition? Does he study the ethical values of the Jewish tradition?
In particular, is he conversant with the Jewish understanding of the nature of the fetus and Judaism’s position on abortion, which teaches that an abortion, for whatever reason, is not an act of murder, because the fetus in not considered a human being with the identical status of the mother until the baby’s head crowns?
Or does Mr. Shapiro merely conform to the values of American conservatism, values in this matter, developed and fought for by Catholic and Fundamentalist Christianity, traditions that view a fetus, in contradistinction to Judaism, as a fully formed person with rights transcending those of the women bearing that fetus?
In other words, how closely does our kippah-wearing friend follow the tenets of his birth tradition which, at least by his public dress, he would appear to possess some loyalty, rather than parrot another religious tradition that now, by virtue of three Trump appointees, dominates the public square?
Does Ben Shapiro even know the ‘Jewish’ view on the matter of abortion? And if Mr. Shapiro is aware of the ‘Jewish’ view on abortion–which essentially prioritizes the mother’s rights over that of the fetus–why has he chosen to abandon that view in preference of the view of some Christian understandings of the nature of the fetus? Does Mr. Shapiro pay any attention to the ethics of his birth tradition, or does he merely wear the kippah to receive some kind of sympathetic effect that perhaps argues, look at me: I’m a Jew and yet also a conservative in the style of Clarence Thomas (who does not wear a kippah and who is now chomping at the bit to go after other rights, such as same sex marriage and contraception).
Without being aware of the Jewish intellectual process Mr. Shapiro underwent to bring himself into the same intellectual territory as Amy Coney Barrett, I can only point out that in the matter of abortion, the man with the kippa has elected to remove himself from the teachings of the Jewish tradition.
I find myself fascinated by this smug, humorless Jew whose effect allows him to opine with such certainty, a boyish man who has elevated himself to pundit status by hewing to the straight and narrow of American conservatism. There are other Jews who argue for traditional conservative views (one need only read or hear a few moments of John Podhoretz, e.g., to see what I mean). But with Shapiro, it’s the kippah that signals to me, apparently erroneously, that he’s offering us views from within the matrix of the Jewish tradition. Of the many smug opinions worthy of a high school debater I’ve heard and read coming from his mouth or pen, I cannot recall a single view that consciously reflects any serious study on his part of the tradition into which I presume he was born.
Merely that thin, black kippah clipped atop his head testifies to his being a Jew.