ed note–The readers will recall how recently, Israel admitted–contrary to what was the ‘official’ lie for half a century–that her attack on the USS LIBERTY was in fact NOT the result of ‘mistaken identity’ but rather that she knew it was an American ship but was ‘forced’ to do it by then-American president Lyndon Baines Johnson. As well, Netanyahu was was handed a healthy dose of holy hell by saying that Hitler did not originally intend to ‘kill all the Jews’ but rather was convinced to do so by what was at that time the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini.

The lesson here is how Jews who adhere to the ‘by way of deception, we shall make war’ protocol will deviate even from positions to which they were glued for DECADES if in doing so, some forward momentum for the ‘grand plan’ can be achieved.

Likewise with the comments from Eisenkot and the admission that the Syrian rebels were indeed armed by Israel, something she has denied doing for years. Contrary to the implication contained in the piece below that this was a faux pas on his part, the more likely explanation is that it was deliberately put out there–like the aforementioned situations described above involving the USS LIBERTY and Hitler’s ‘final solution’–in order to achieve something that otherwise might not be possible. Exactly what, no one can say for sure right now, (related to Trump’s pullout?) but it is unlikely that someone as cunning and as clever as Eisenkot ‘cut the cheese’ on this accidentally, because, as has been demonstrated now for thousands of years, and as put by none other than Jesus Christ Himself, fish swim, birds fly, and Jews lie.

RT.com

The outgoing IDF chief of staff has spilled the beans on a poorly guarded secret of the Israeli military, that it has supplied Syrian rebels fighting President Bashar Assad’s government with weapons “for self-defense.”

Gadi Eisenkot, who was the Israeli Defense Forces’ Chief of Staff for the last three years, told the Sunday Times in a farewell interview that Israel had been directly involved in the Syrian conflict on the side of the Syrian rebels, something that Tel Aviv has refused to acknowledge before.

The general, who is retiring from military service, said that Israel supplied rebels at the border with light weapons for the purposes of “self-defense.”

While the direct links between Syrian rebels and Israeli commanders have been officially revealed for the first time, rumors of close military ties between the armed militants and the Israeli government have been circulating for years.

Foreign Policy magazine reported in September that Israel supplied weapons and gave money to at least 12 rebel groups holed up in southern Syria. The arrangement reportedly included Israeli officials also giving $75-per-person monthly allowances to rebel fighters, in addition to the funds their leaders received to procure weapons on the black market

In return, rebels were expected to deter Hezbollah and Iran proxies from the Israeli-occupied part of the Golan Heights.

The scheme was reportedly in effect throughout Operation Good Neighbor, which officially kicked off in June 2016 and was wrapped up only last November. Within this undertaking, Israel was openly assisting the rebels but claimed that assistance was strictly humanitarian. Israel treated wounded Syrian rebels and their families in its hospitals, provided some 1,524 tons of food, 250 tons of clothes, 947,520 liters of fuel, as well as a huge amount of medical supplies.

However, until recently Israel kept vigorously denying any involvement beyond that. The Jerusalem Post’s report in September on the IDF confirming that it had provided light weapons to Syrian rebels was promptly pulled from its website. The newspaper told RT at the time that it was forced to remove the article by the army’s censor, apparently, “for security reasons.”

In November, Maj. Gen. Gershon Hacohen, a former senior commander with the IDF, revealed that former Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon had personally met with a group of Syrian rebels, without specifying the time period. Ya’alon was Israel’s chief of defense from 2013 to May 2016.

The Israeli military seems to have finally begun to reveal the scope of its involvement in the Syrian conflict, previously shrouded in secrecy. In an interview with the New York Times, Eisenkot acknowledged that Israel has been waging a large-scale bombing campaign aimed at degrading Iran’s military influence in the region. In 2018 alone, the IDF dropped 2,000 bombs on alleged Iran-linked targets in Syria. Sorties into the neighboring country’s territory became“near-daily events” after PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s government greenlighted the expansion of the operation in January 2017, according to the retiring general.

2 thoughts on “How They Do It–After years of speculation and outright denials, outgoing IDF chief admits Israel supplied Syrian rebels with weapons”
  1. unrelated but interesting – jew infiltration
    been long time since i’ve come across maurice pinay

  2. You can bet your last U.S. federal reserve note that those “Syrian” rebels were more-often-than-not Jews, certainly in positions of authority.

    You can also conclude with a high degree of certainty, that the $75 per month the fighters were getting is all the Jews deemed necessary to spare from the $10 million plus, per day, the U.S. tax payers fork over to IsRaEl.

    And the “black market” weapons given to the [Jew] leaders of the rebels, were most likely those that now deceased “U.S. Ambassador” Stevens in Libya had been illegally running before he was taken out by Madame Clinton.

    The “U.S.” media never bothered to ‘unmask’ the fact that IsRaEl was running “near daily” bombing sorties into Syria in 2018. But now that Eisenkot has divulged this one of millions of dirty secrets, we are left to wonder as to his motivations, which are undoubtedly one and the same as those of the Jew leadership, since they don’t flush a commode without having agreement amongst themselves.

    My first impression is their purpose is to continue their gangster threats, the type of stuff a small business in anywhere USA might experience when the owner is told he/she needs to pay “protection” money. But, there’s likely more to it than meets the eye.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading