Is a died-in-the-wool NeoConservative warmonger, proud member of the tribe, asset for Israeli intelligence and one of the tentacled heads of the Zionist hydra out to make sure that War, Inc keeps moving forward in exactly the manner as Judea, Inc demands.
In such a capacity, it is his job, working alongside other assets such as Bill Kristol, Jennifer Rubin, Robert Kagan, Max Boot, Eliot Cohen and the rest of the gang who ‘sold’ the American people on the entire ‘clash of civilizations’ time bomb post 9/11 to remove any and all impediments to the forward momentum of that war machine, which includes of course those politicians such as Donald J. Trump who have decided that Armageddon is not in America’s (or anyone else’s) interests.
But, as we say here often, by all means, all yuuz out there who made up your minds a long time ago that Trump–by virtue of his ‘Joosh’ daughter and ‘Joosh’ son-in-law–must therefore be a pawn of Judea Inc, pay absolutely no mind whatsoever to glaringly important pieces such as this that were obviously written not to help the Trump administration, but indeed, to bring it down and see it replaced with another that is much more compliant and cooperative with Israel’s demands.
Donald Trump may not know it yet, but his presidency is collapsing.
His tweets Thursday announcing the resignation of Defense Secretary James Mattis by the end of February were polite and respectful. And it would be easy to attribute this resignation to a difference in policy: Trump ignored Mattis and went forward with a hasty and ill-considered withdrawal of U.S. forces from Syria. It looks like Trump is about to do the same thing in Afghanistan.
But that does not capture what has just happened. Just read the retired general’s resignation letter. In it, Mattis shows that he is thinking about something much bigger than Syria policy.
Here are some noteworthy quotes: “Our strength as a nation is inextricably linked to the strength of our unique and comprehensive system of alliances and partnerships.” And: “We must do everything possible to advance an international order that is most conducive to our security, prosperity and values, and we are strengthened in this effort by the solidarity of our alliances.” And this: “We must be resolute and unambiguous in our approach to those countries whose strategic interests are increasingly in tension with ours.”
Then Mattis goes in for the kill shot. “Because you have the right to have a Secretary of Defense whose views are better aligned with yours on these and other subjects, I believe it is right for me to step down from my position.”
The strong implication here is that Mattis no longer believes the president thinks allies should be respected. He is resigning because he does not believe Trump agrees with him that America should work to preserve a liberal international order. He is resigning because Trump is not as resolute and unambiguous with America’s adversaries as Mattis believes he should be.
In other words: This is not about policy. It’s about values — and, according to his letter, Mattis no longer believes the president shares his values.
That said, there are practical implications. On Wednesday, most Republican senators made clear how furious they were in a policy lunch with Vice President Mike Pence over the substance and process of the Syria decision. Expect that rebellion among Republican senators to get hotter in the coming days as America’s Kurdish allies in Syria brace for a pending onslaught from the Turks.
Trump could have used Mattis to bring the Senate around to his thinking on Syria. He doesn’t have that option anymore.
The president’s supporters may still feel unfazed, even confident. Trump has burned through two chiefs of staff, two national security advisers, a secretary of state and an attorney general in less than two years. He has survived.
This resignation, though, is different. As I wrote two months ago, Mattis provided Trump with a powerful shield. Whatever you thought of his views, Mattis embodied military virtue and the spirit of public service. As long as he served the president, reluctant Republicans could point to the Pentagon and say: If Mattis supports Trump, then so do I.
One thought on “How They Do It–Mattis Resignation indicates Trump's presidency is collapsing”
“The strong implication here is that Mattis no longer believes the president thinks allies should be respected.”
Translation: The strong implication here is that Mattis has come to realize that Trump doesn’t want to kowtow to the ‘)ews’ foreign policy.
“Whatever you thought of his views, Mattis embodied military virtue and the spirit of public service.”
But he didn’t want to follow through on the Commander in Chief’s view/ideas on how to use the military, therefore he wasn’t an asset to the President and to the campaign promises the President made to the American public. The U.S. has been overseas killing people for over 15 years and nothing but killing has been accomplished. The Taliban will still be in control in Afghanistan. There is already public discussion of peace negotiations there. Iraq is broken up. Libya is broken up. Only most of Syria is still under Syrian gov’t control.
“The strong implication here is that Mattis no longer believes the president thinks allies should be respected.”
Translation: The strong implication here is that Mattis has come to realize that Trump doesn’t want to kowtow to the ‘)ews’ foreign policy.
“Whatever you thought of his views, Mattis embodied military virtue and the spirit of public service.”
But he didn’t want to follow through on the Commander in Chief’s view/ideas on how to use the military, therefore he wasn’t an asset to the President and to the campaign promises the President made to the American public. The U.S. has been overseas killing people for over 15 years and nothing but killing has been accomplished. The Taliban will still be in control in Afghanistan. There is already public discussion of peace negotiations there. Iraq is broken up. Libya is broken up. Only most of Syria is still under Syrian gov’t control.