ed note–The author’s use of the term ‘Genesis’–despite his apparently not realizing it–in describing the barbaric manner in which Jews treat Palestinians is more than just a little pregnant in its implications, for indeed the roots of this Judaic hatred for the indigenous people in the region goes much further back than simply 1948, 1967, or 1993. This hatred, expressed in the most unmitigated violent manner imaginable, as well as the perceived inherent right of the Jews to rob the non-Israelite of all his possessions, including life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness–got its inception within the pages of that very same book named Genesis that appears in the title of this piece, to wit–
‘On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abraham, saying ‘To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river Euphrates’…–Genesis, 15:18
As well as the eternal hatred which the Israelite maintains towards his ‘half brother’, Ishmael, found in Genesis 16, to wit–
…And Sarah said to Abraham, ‘Get rid of that slave woman and her son, for that woman’s son will never share in the inheritance with my son Isaac…And so early the next morning Abraham took some food and a skin of water and gave them to Hagar. He set them on her shoulders and then sent her off with the boy into the Desert of Beersheba. When the water in the skin was gone, she put the boy under one of the bushes. Then she went off and sat down about a bowshot away, for she thought, ‘I cannot watch the boy die,’ and as she sat there, she began to sob…’
Therefore, no sane person with a GENUINE desire to understand the root of this problem and thus arrive at a logical, productive solution, can have any discussion involving the way that Jews treat the non-Jews of the region (and elsewhere) and at the same time deliberately avoid discussing these vitally important factoids. Everything that has taken place over the course of the last century has been/is/always will be as difficult to forecast and foresee as cold weather in winter and yet it is this central theme–the inveterate and organic Judaic hatred of the non-Israelite as clearly outlined within the pages of the Old Testament/Torah–that is the one thing which virtually all persons involved in this discussion absolutely refuse to discuss, either due to their own particular brand of ‘identity politics’ or else for fear of being branded ‘bigots’.
Yes, the Jews will react to the author’s essay with all their typical theatrics–they are psychologically programmed to do so in accordance with their collective hive mentality, but in the final analysis, they LOVE articles of this type, as it merely addresses the symptoms of the problem without even touching upon its real roots at the molecular, elemental, atomic, and sub-atomic levels.
AntiGentilists mistakenly interpret it as: “From the Euphrates to the SACRAMENTO.”
One would be wise to NEVER lose sight of this cold, hard FACT.
Jewish hatred of non-Jews is often claimed to be a “fringe belief”. Thousands of quotations expressing hatred of “goyim” or plans for world domination, more than a few made at major Jewish conferences, are also portrayed as the beliefs of “just one man / woman”. Ramzy Baroud notes these beliefs are shared by important figures in Israel’s elected government. That would certainly suggest that hatred of “goyim” is more than a “fringe belief”.
In 2010, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef stated ““Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel”. The President of the American Jewish Conference called this statement “outrageous”, and “unrepresentative”. Yet when the Rabbi died in 2013, more than 10% of the population of Israel turned out for his funeral. Some of the mourners wondered “Who will lead us now?” IMO, when 10%+ of a nation turns out for a funeral, it represents probably two or three times that number who couldn’t show up for various reasons, but even 10% indicates that Ovadia’s opinion of the “goyim” is not a “fringe belief”.
“From the Euphrates to the Sacramento” if that ain’t that the truth! There must be a river in Riyadh ? i just don’t see how the Arabs there can stomach the Israeli…it’s got to be plain that the Joos want it All.
carn, when people came out for jfk’s funeral, it wasn’t 10% of the us population, was it.
yet his popularity was immense and still is, at least 85% of americans have a strongly favorable view of him and his policies.
i think that ovadia’s appeal to worldwide jewry is around 100%, maybe 97% if reduced by the 5% error margin, i.e., we can be 95% sure that ovadia’s support among the global jewry is not less than 97%.
when you remove the kol nidre voice anonymizer out of the president of american (hah!) jew congress’ mouth and translate back into hebe, it comes out as the truth meant for die juden: it is “legitimate” and “representative”.
Hello TUT,
I am a TUT subscriber and fan. What I can read of your articles always seem very well written and researched. I have been an Old Testament aficionado for many years since majoring in philosophy and religion in undergraduate school. Of course, to be knowledgeable about the Old Testament, one must understand the Jews. I love your site, however, I cannot access your site to read the rest of the excellent articles you post. I am assuming the ADL has had you site banned from the WWW. Am I incorrect in my assumption? Also, is there any other way that I can re-access the more in depth material you publish?
Thanks for your help.
ed note-Can I ask where you are and the method which you are using, i.e. a library or some public place? Yours is not the first email I’ve gotten recently saying they can’t access TUT.
thank you
mg