The beginning of Jewish national history is found in this week’s Torah reading.
ed note–of the many things I/we inherited from the many years spent working closely with the irreplaceable MCP, one thing–for better or for worse–is becoming a ‘stickler for details,’ as Mike put it, or at least in terms of those details surrounding certain subjects, one of which is Judaism, which I/we believe to be the beating heart of the problem we are all facing today.
Now, it is almost as much a law of nature as gravity itself these days that within certain circles we are not supposed to discuss Judaism. Zionism is fair game, because now it is so manifestly evil, so manifestly violent, so manifestly dishonest, so manifestly rapacious (we could go on for days until the English language ran out of synonyms) and as such, to try and squelch any discussion about the ‘Z’ word would be as pointless as trying to hide the fact that VD exists and is spread through irresponsible and immoral sexual behavior.
HAVING SAID THAT, those who do dare to venture forth into that once-upon-a time ‘no man’s land’ beginning with the ‘Z’ word assiduously avoid and–more importantly, FORBID–any honest, intelligent, and productive discussion of the very womb which brought the once-upon-a-time forbidden ‘Z’ word into existence, the dreaded ‘J’ word, meaning Judaism.
Besides the shouting, screaming, censorship and accusations all designed to prevent and preclude any such discussions involving the dreaded ‘J’ word from taking place, one of the mechanisms by which prying eyes are kept far away from this particularly problematic area is the use of slogans that–while sounding good to itchy ears and to weak minds, nevertheless are as vacuous and as void of fact as saying that dogs can’t be carnivores because–as everyone knows–dogs are ‘man’s best friend’ and man is made of meat, and since dogs don’t eat man, ergo, dogs are not carnivores, quod erat demonstratum.
We have all run into these slogans at some point in our very difficult and at times dangerous climb in trying to reach the summit of Mt. Truth–‘Judaism and Zionism are totally different entities…One is religious, the other is political. One is peaceful, the other is violent’.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah…
We aren’t going to go into all the particulars showing just how ‘peaceful’ Judaism is, with its thousands of written commandments and commendments invoking or congratulating GAAAAWD’S chosenoids for the violence they perpetrate against Gentiles–past, present, and future–but for those who might not be aware of such protocols, we recommend this thing known as the Torah (Old Testament) and in particular, books such as Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Deuteronomy, Numbers, Kings, Joshua, etc, for a good start.
Here we have yet another piece to that puzzle linking the carnivorous nature of Zionism to the carnivorous nature of Judaism in an essay appearing on the Arutz Sheva website where our esteemed Hebraic author makes Kristol clear the fact that indeed, the roots of Zionism are to be found in the putrid, poisoned, radioactive and contaminated soil of Judaism.
As a final thought to all those who just LUUUUUV throwing names of individuals and groups out there such as Neturei Karta, Jewish Voice for Peace, Rabbis for Human Rights, Torah True Jews, Jumping Jews for Justice, Leaping Levites for Love, Hollering Hebrews for Humanity, whatever, we’d like to leave you with a little visual imagery to consider the next time some shyster comes along with that magic potion and very seductive language that ‘Judaism and Zionism are totally different’–
Individuals such as this represent what I like to refer to as the ‘squirt gun brigade’. With sirens a-blaring and lights a-blazing, they make a BIG show of arriving at the inferno that their cousins lit, and with squirtguns in hand, make an even BIGGER show of acting all tough and brave as they PRETEND to risk life and limb extinguishing the flames and do so to thunderous applause.
In the end however it is all for show, as they accomplish nothing other than creating confusion about the Judaic nature of the arson itself. The fire continues to burn, innocent people have their lives destroyed, but hey, at least they gave it a good squirt, ya’ know?
In the meantime the stupid goyim lap it up and shower them with applause for doing nothing while the rest of us who really DO risk life and limb in trying to put out the fire and save innocent lives get no credit at all while simultaneously receiving a ton of grief for naming the arsonists and–more importantly–isolating and exposing the philosophical underpinnings of the arson itself.
As we often say, if it is coming out of a Judaic mouth, your/our first assumption needs to be that in some manner it is factually flawed (fancy verbiage for ‘untrue’) because–almost as much a rule of nature as gravity itself–fish swim, birds fly, and Jews lie.
No offense to to the Christians that I thank you for exposing the hyprocity of the jew, but the major stories they “ the jew” told were stolen from the Mesopotamians. All claims are based on thievery , and lies. It is a fairytale that needs to be exposed.
[John 8:39] They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
They are the children of Beelzebub (hebrew for satan) and they do his lusts and speak his native language (lies).
I too noticed that “zionism” as a subject can be critiqued now without an immediate condemnation of being labeled an anti-semite…. would it then not be possible to tie it in with the Torah? Merely point out that everything zionism is, comes from judaism? I think if we use that strategy often and long enough it might just change the consciousness of the public.
Also, to affect the religious people, you can point out that God’s covenant (contract) was broken by the jews over and over, that they are not entitled to the land anymore. As with all things, it’s conditional. Suppose for a moment if Abraham didn’t attempt to sacrifice his son Ishmael (first born, another place the jews have tried to steal His inheritance) that God would bless Abraham? God’s covenant is with ALL people, not just the chosensteins. If you or I broke our end of the bargain, we also would not be entitled to any of the rewards.
For the humanists out there… Britain had no right in giving other people’s land away. Imagine the opposite for a second… that Palestine gave the UK to the jews… how well would that go over in the West?
So you see, the jews are not owed anything, for they have broken their promise to God (Divine law) and under human law, they are also in the same boat: they have no right to “israel”.
I definitely can’t find any fault with your commentary; it’s top notch!
I would also like to point out that the final paragraph is a particularly important statement:
If Gentiles took that to heart, we could clear up this multi-millennial problem pretty quickly.
Well, I guess I’m pretty slow but I never understood the following:
They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham. [John 8:39]
My understanding of this passage is that Christ is telling them that they NEED to do the “works of Abraham”. But, weren’t they then and, aren’t they still? This doesn’t seem like very good advice. I’m confused. 😕
The original story of Abraham, as told in the Quran not the version in the Bible. Abraham was a holy man, not the pimp and child killer as has been known in the West.