Jewish Mental Ilness on display over Supreme Court's Gay Marriage Ruling

As we say here often, the ‘Jewish problem’ as it has existed from the beginning of time is rooted in a simple-to-explain/simple-to-understand concept–Mental illness.

Lest we forget, the entire ‘Jrama’–obvious pun intended–begins with a guy named Abraham hearing voices in his head telling him that he has been ‘chosen’ for greatness by some higher power and that his kith-n-kin are destined to rule the world with a rod of iron. A few moments later, these same voices are then telling him to murder his son, chop his dead body into pieces and burn it in what was a pre-figurement of the type of human sacrifice that predominated in various primitive, barbaric cultures and which took center stage in Mel Gibson’s blockbuster film Apocalypto.

One of the many symptoms psychiatrists use in diagnosing someone who is mentally ill, psychotic or suffering from schizophrenia (all conditions that predominate within the Jewish community to a disproportionately high ratio in comparison to non-Jews) is the patient’s ability to hold 2 contradictory ideas together at the same time and to believe them both.

The recent ruling by the US Supreme Court outlawing ‘discriminatory’ marriage licensing by the states is a perfect case in point. That organized Jewish interests had a hand in it is as much a wild eyed conspiracy theory as saying that rice is served at Chinese restaurants. The Jews and all their heavy-hitter organizations from the ADL to the American Jewish Committee–everyone without fail–crowed and brayed in joy over the recent ruling and–more importantly–claimed credit for it. What few people following the story fail to realize is that it was actually the ADL itself that brought the case to begin with, as outlined on the ADL website, to wit—

ADL’s amicus brief, filed on behalf of a broad, diverse group of religiously affiliated organizations, recounted how discriminatory laws targeting disadvantaged groups have long been justified by religious and moral disapproval, an argument that has been rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The brief argued that overturning the marriage ban would not only ensure that religious considerations do not improperly influence which marriages the state can recognize, but would also allow religious groups to decide the definition of marriage for themselves.

ADL was joined on the briefs by American Jewish Committee; Bend the Arc: A Jewish Partnership for Justice; The Central Conference of American Rabbis and the Women of Reform Judaism; Global Justice Institute; Hadassah – The Women’s Zionist Organization of America, Inc, Jewish Social Policy Action Network (JSPAN); Keshet; The National Council of Jewish Women; Nehirim; People for the American Way Foundation; Reconstructionist Rabbinical College and Jewish Reconstructionist Communities; Religious Institute, Inc.; Society for Humanistic Judaism; South Asian Americans Leading Together; T’ruah: The Rabbinic Call for Human Rights; and Women’s League for Conservative Judaism.

The law firm Greenberg Traurig, LLP prepared the friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of ADL.

In other words, according to the ADL, ‘the Jews did it.’

Yes, there were a few token non-Jewish organizations that took turns pissing into the town well alongside their Jewish counterparts by throwing their names into the list, but it is obvious to even a blind man that it was the Jews–working through their various organizations and pressure groups–who were responsible for filing the brief and then utilizing whatever backdoor ‘influence’ was necessary to get it rammed down the throats of the American people.

NOW HOWEVER, despite crowing about it VERY LOUDLY publicly on various websites from the Forward to The Times of Israel to Haaretz and every other bullhorn they can get their grubby hands on, NOW HOWEVER (and just to underscore the mental illness that afflicts these people) when some lowly gentile Christian DARES to say THE EXACT SAME THING THEY THEMSELVES HAVE BEEN SAYING NOW FOR HOURS ON END SINCE THE S.C. DECISION–they are in fits over it, as evidenced in this piece appearing in the Jerusalem Post featuring our own good friend Mark Dankof, to wit–