ed note–boy, oh, boy, where do we even begin?
Ok, let’s start off with one of our oldies but goodies, i.e. ‘How They Do It’.
‘Far-right activists’.
This is how the seduction begins, literally within the first 3 words–‘far-right activists’. Like calling a ravenous, man-eating tiger a ‘pussycat’ or a 200-pound wolf a ‘cute little pooch’, it is a form of linguistic black magic and word-wizardry that by its very design, under-reports the size, scope, and species of danger posed by such creatures, no different than calling the head-choppers of ISIS members of a ‘conservative-leaning religious faith’.
These are not ‘activists’. They are Jewish terrorists who showed up to voice their support for their brothers-in-arms who are on trial for the deliberate dousing of an entire family of Palestinian ‘Ishmaelites’ with gasoline and burning them to death.
And, lest the reader think that the fact that there are indeed Jews being charged with this that it indicates that Israel is just like any other sane country with laws that prohibit such activities, think again. THE ONLY REASON that theatre such as this is playing to the world is because the facts related to the arson of the Dawabshe family made their way into the news and therefore, in doing ‘damage control’ to what would otherwise be YET ANOTHER disaster in revealing the true face of ‘The Jewish State’, the powers that be in Israel have elected to go forward with at least the pretenses of ‘justice’.
Remember that what took place with the deliberate incineration of this innocent Palestinian family was just a latter-day repeat of what the founding fathers of the Jewish state, including night-creatures such as Ariel Sharon, Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir and others did in places such as Deir Yassin, Sabra & Shatilla, etc, etc, etc.
Nexto, keep in mind that the perpetrators of this barbaric act of human sacrifice can rest at night knowing that–according to the ‘protocols’ of their Judah-ism, they are innocent of any wrongdoing.
As much as various defenders/apologists for the Jewish religion, including many Christians and Muslims of various stripes, will claim that what took place was in complete contradiction, contravention, and conflict with the peaceful, righteous core-teachings of Moses and his ‘5 Books’ known as the Torah, this is as absolutely, categorically FALSE as saying that fish fly and that birds swim. The DNA of Torah Judah-ism is Kristol clear on the topic of those duties which the Hebrews, Israelites, Judeans, Judahites, etc, etc, etc, are to perform in ‘settling’ the land ‘promised’ to them, just one example of which leaves no doubt as to what the ideological/religious roots were/are of the deliberate Dawabshe murders, to wit–
‘When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall save nothing alive that breathes…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy. You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…’–Book of Deuteronomy
Nevertheless, as doubtless and as predictable as vultures coming to feed on a rotting, stinking carcass, will also come those aforementioned apologists and defenders of Torah Judah-ism (including many Christians and Muslims) and of the KRISTOL CLEAR commandments found within those ‘5 books of Moses’ that command/demand the murder/incineration of Gentiles in furthering the aims of Judah-ism and who will mindlessly and without as much as an ounce of truth, maintain with a straight face that what these ‘terrorists’ did was a violation of the ‘peaceful teachings’ of Judah-ism, thus affording the devil and his children YET ANOTHER layer of mask and mascara with which they can conceal further the truly dangerous nature of their Judaic beings.
Times of Israel
Far-right activists chanted slogans cheering for the death of an 18-month old Palestinian child outside a courthouse in central Israel as the late toddler’s family walked near them following a hearing Tuesday.
Referencing toddler Ali Saad Dawabshe, killed in a 2015 arson attack carried out by Jewish terrorists, right-wing extremists chanted ‘Where is Ali? Ali’s dead…Ali’s on the grill’ and other hate slogans.
Roughly two dozen youth had gathered outside the Central District Court in the city of Lod for a ruling regarding the admissibility of the confessions given by the two suspects in the firebombing of the Dawabsha home, which killed toddler Ali Saad Dawabsha and parents Riham and Saad Dawabsha.
Another son, Ahmed Dawabsha, who was 5 at the time, underwent months of treatment for severe burns sustained in the attack.
The chanting took place as uncle and grandfather Nasr and Hussein Dawabsha, who have served as guardians for Ahmed Dawabsha since the attack, walked out of the courtroom accompanied by Joint (Arab) List MKs Ahmad Tibi and Ayman Odeh.
A spokesman for Tibi managed to capture most of the chants on video, including those of one young religious activist who approached the crowd of Dawabsha supporters and shouted, ‘Where is Ali? He’s burned!’ as he laughed.
Roughly 20 police officers were at the scene, but did not appear to react as the chants persisted.
The Dawabsha relatives stood by their supporters without responding.
‘These racist barbaric chants indicate that the far-right protesters’ natural place is a zoo,’ Nasr Dawabsha told The Times of Israel outside the courtroom.
The scene was reminiscent of a video following the Duma attack in which far-right activists were seen celebrating at a wedding by holding pictures of the baby and stabbing it.
The footage, which was widely condemned, led police to arrest several people who had attended the “hate wedding” as the incident was dubbed.
Police on Tuesday made no move to stop the protesters.
Nassar Dawabsha said that if a Palestinian were to take pride in the murder of an Israeli in the manner which the protesters did, “they would receive the harshest of punishments from authorities.”
He accused police of “ensuring the protection” of the demonstrators.
Inside in a dramatic ruling moments prior, the court’s three-judge panel threw out a confession given by the teenage accomplice accused of involvement in the deadly Duma attack, saying that the statement had been given under duress.
However, a confession given by primary suspect Amiram Ben-Uliel was cleared for use after judges determined that enough time had passed between when he was tortured and when he admitted to the crime.
The decision creates a major hurdle for the prosecution, which may now need to throw out the case against the unnamed minor accused of helping plan the firebombing of the Dawabsha family home on July 31, 2015.
The suspects charged last year with carrying out the attack have claimed innocence, insisting they only confessed to the crime after being subjected to torture at the hands of Shin Bet interrogators.
In April, the Central District Attorney’s Office announced that it would avoid using confessions obtained from the suspects by way of ‘special means,’ referring to confessions extracted under duress.
The prosecution is believed to possess additional evidence on which to base its indictment against Ben-Uliel tying him to the Duma case. The minor’s admissible statements only refer to other incidents, which he still may face prosecution for.
The court has differentiated between confessions obtained in what is known as a ‘necessary interrogation’ and those that are obtained in a typical interrogation. In the former, investigators are authorized to use enhanced methods against the suspects due to a ‘ticking time bomb scenario’ in which authorities believe another attack might be imminent.
However, the court ruled those statements inadmissible.