As US military officers take a growing role in Israel’s war efforts, concern is mounting that vital cooperation with Washington is starting to blur the line between ‘partnership’ and control…
ed note–as always, lots of ‘must knows’ that every war-weary Gentile with a vested interest in his/her own future survival needs to understand about all of this.
Firsto, ladies and Gentile-men, as we are wont to do from time to time on this humble little informational endeavor, a lil’ pictographical digression–
The above is the infamous pic of the most recent ‘sit down’ between POTUS DJT and the terrorist Jew Netanyahu, where the Judaic warlord was forced to read a pre-written apology to the government of Qatar for the terrorist strikes he ordered against that country a month or so previously in order to murder the Hamas negotiators and bring POTUS DJT’s plans for ending the Genocide in Gaza to a violent and ‘Jramatic’ end.
Now, since the importance of the above pic, and even more relevant, the story behind it, seems to have escaped the notice of LOTS of political commenters these days, we here at this humble little informational endeavor will try to spell out its significance in the clearest of language.
Presidents who are ‘owned’ and/or ‘controlled’ by Netanyahu, by Israel, by the ‘Jewish Lobby’, by Miriam Adelson, by the ‘Epstein Files’, yada, yada, yada, no pun intended, don’t do things such as this. They don’t force powerful Jews like the terrorist warlord Netanyahu to prostrate himself humbly before the leader OF AN ISHMAELITE/AMALEKITE COUNTRY, ask for forgiveness, and then promise never to engage in similar terrorist behavior again.
For if indeed POTUS DJT was ‘owned’ and/or ‘controlled’ by Netanyahu, by Israel, by the ‘Jewish Lobby’, by Miriam Adelson, by the ‘Epstein Files’, yada, yada, yada, no pun intended, as so many ‘experts’ these days claim, he wouldn’t DARE put Netanyahu in such a spot as this, and if he did, Netanyahu would simply smile at him and say what needed to be said in that dialect of gangsterese with which the terrorist Jew is fluent…
…And the matter would drop, right then, and right there…
So, ladies and Gentile-men, what the pictographical digression shows CLEARLY, is the nature of the hierarchical relationship existing between POTUS DJT and the terrorist Jew Netanyahu, namely who is the boss, and who ISN’T.
We go to explanatory lengths such as these due to the fact that for reasons that at this moment remain unclear and quite confusing, very few people out there seem to ‘get it’, i.e. concepts such as those that are made clear by pics such as the above.
What’s worse is the fact that in the process of not ‘getting’ it, LOTS of people out there with their websites, podcasts, pulpits, and soapboxes, do an enormous amount of damage to what it is that the POTUS is trying to achieve here, which is not just an end to the Genocide in Gaza, but indeed, an end to the planned Genocide of the entire PLANET which has been on the Jews’ ‘to do’ list for the last 3,000 years.
Now, having said all of that, nota bene the following–
POTUS DJT’s plans for ‘occupying’ Israel and encircling her with US military bases in a near-360 arc as part of his plans for caging the monster is not the result of him being ‘owned’ by the Jews. They, the Pirates of Judea, are nothing short of apocalyptically furious over these latest developments, and despite the fact that this fury has not YET manifested itself, either in word or in action, rest assured that eventually, just like gravity causing objects to fall to the earth’s surface, IT WILL.
In the meantime, fellow Gentiles, do all of us on God’s green earth the courtesy of NOT engaging in that business which the terrorist Jews seeking our collective destruction need, which is to confuse the battlefield of ideas and discussion with a bunch of disconnected-from-reality nonsense concerning the heirarchical nature of the relationship between POTUS DJT and the mass murderer Beelzu-Bibi, nonsense that is rooted more in an episode of Looney Toons than anything else.
Ynet News
Israel was founded on a simple conviction, that no one else would defend it. The idea of self-reliance — of taking responsibility for its own security — has been central to the state’s identity since its birth.
Yet as U.S. military officers take seats inside Israel’s war rooms and decision-making forums, that foundational principle may be shifting.
From Gaza to the northern border, American involvement has moved from consultation to direct participation. U.S. officers now play an active role in coordinating humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip, managing ceasefires, and monitoring supply routes. The rapid establishment of joint civilian-military centers under U.S. leadership marks a new phase of American on-the-ground engagement.
This is no longer remote cooperation. American officers are present in key operational spaces in Tel Aviv, in what officials describe as ‘coordination’ — but what some Israelis fear is quiet oversight.
The concern, voiced increasingly in Israeli commentary, is that Washington’s expanding role risks turning a partnership into dependence.
‘It’s not assistance anymore,’ one observer wrote. ‘It’s the transfer of a central component of our operational sovereignty — the very responsibility for our own lives.’
Reports that U.S. President Donald Trump is seeking a security arrangement between Israel and Syria have deepened such concerns. According to Israeli media, the U.S. military is preparing to establish a base near Damascus, modeled after the ‘monitoring base’ set up in Kiryat Gat to oversee operations related to Gaza.
There are also indications of plans for another American facility at Israel’s southern border.
There is no question about the importance of the U.S.-Israel alliance. The military partnership runs deep, built on decades of intelligence sharing, training, and vital defense technology. But critics warn of a critical distinction between cooperation that strengthens Israel’s independence and involvement that gives foreign officers practical influence over whether Israeli operations move forward or stop.
Once American commanders are physically in the room, their judgment can easily become the final one.
And that raises a deeper question: Who will now send Israel’s soldiers into battle? Who bears responsibility for the consequences of those decisions?
The United States seeks regional stability — a legitimate goal. But it is not always the same as the interest of those living within meters of an active border. The parents of young children in Metula, on Israel’s northern edge, are unlikely to entrust their lives to a distant foreign army. And Israel Defense Forces soldiers need to know that the commanders ordering them into combat are accountable only to their own country.
Israel needs the United States, especially in a volatile region. But partnership cannot become control. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu owes the public transparency about the scope of American involvement and its implications.
The red lines must be clear: full disclosure of foreign presence in decision-making, defined limits on external oversight, and explicit exit conditions for U.S. involvement. Decisions of war and peace — especially those that send young Israelis into harm’s way — must remain in Israeli hands.
Anything less would cross a line that is not only about national pride, but about life itself.