by James Petras
Ethno-religious (ER) beliefs and practices have been harmless when individuals or groups linked to those practices have limited influence over the state and economy. In contrast, when such groups exercise a disproportionately powerful influence over the state and economy, they dominate and exploit majorities while forming closed self-replicating networks.
Examples of powerful ethno-centric regimes in the 1930’s are well known for their brutality and devastating consequences. These include the white Christians in the US, Germany and the European colonial settlement regimes in Rhodesia, South Africa, India and Indonesia, as well as the Japanese imperialists in Asia.
In the post-colonial or neo-colonial era, ethno-centrism has taken the form of virulent anti-Islamic hysteria resulting in predatory Western regimes embarking on wars and military occupations in the Middle East.
The rise of Judeo-centrism, as an economic and political force, occurred in the last half of the 20th century. The Jewish-Zionist seizure, occupation and ethnic cleansing of historic Palestine and their rising economic and political influence within the United States has created a formidable power bloc with significant implications for world peace.
The rise of Jewish ethnocentrism (JE) has confounded its proponents as well as its adversaries; Zionists and anti-Semites alike are surprised by the scope and depth of JE.
Advocates and adversaries, of all persuasions, conflate the power of what they call ‘the Jews’ for their own purposes. Advocates find proof of ‘Jewish genius’ in every prestigious position and attribute it to their own unique culture, heredity, and scholarship, rather than the result of a greater social-cultural context. The ‘anti-Semites,’ for their part, attribute all the world’s nefarious dealings and diabolic plots to ‘the Jews’. This creates a strange duality of illusions about the exceptionalism of a minority group.
In this paper I will focus on demystifying the myths buttressing the power of contemporary Judeo-centric ideology, belief and organizational influence. There is little point in focusing on ‘anti-Semitism,’ which has no impact on the economy and the exercise of state power with the possible exception of Saudi Arabia. Even the Saudi Monarchy’s occasional outbursts against Israel do not inhibit it from engaging in large-scale financial transactions with the Jewish banking elite on Wall Street and City of London and from forming covert alliances with Israeli intelligence in order to overthrow secular pro-Palestinian Arab regimes – as has happened in Libya, Iraq and Syria. They have both benefited from the massive ethnic cleansing of the highly educated minority Christian populations of secular Iraq and Syria.
Well I like that James doesn’t lump all Jews into an ethno-chauvinist bloc. There may be a desire amongst some or even many ‘non-Jewish Jews’ for a just, non-tribal society as James suggests. Common sense would suggest that many were thoroughly sick of Jewish cant, hypocrisy, narcissism, neurosis, and overweening conceit. But it’s hard to argue against an unlimited money supply. And reject the huge advantages its bestows on the in-group. We wouldn’t be talking about Jewish Power but for it.
And of course their control of the money supply has its roots in usury. You know, that ancient, outmoded concept which Christianity and Islam historically railed against. When James says admirers of the Jews find proof of their outsize power and prestige in their “unique culture, heredity, and scholarship”, he ignores usury. That is the practice which has UNIQUELY differentiated the Jews from the “greater social-cultural context”. As a collective, they have lived off interest for 1000s of years, going back at least to ancient Babylon. Interest and taxes. And debt slavery.
James sees the “rise of Judeo-centrism, as an economic and political force, occurred in the last half of the 20th century”. The Rothschilds were the undisputed kings of Europe by the last half of 19th century. How else did they conceive and sponsor the rise of Zionazism as a political movement? And how else did they get control of the central banking systems of, most importantly, America and, little by little, every mother-lovin’ country in the world. Apart from those they are presently bombing or intending to bomb.
Of course, the rise of the House of Redshield is only the latest incarnation of the same old dark force which has bedeviled and corrupted societies since the dawn of money as a medium of exchange. Arguably, the rise of modern Jewish Power in Europe coincides with the rise of ‘Finance Capitalism’ which can be said to start with the so-called Bank of England in 1694.
When you’re onto a good thing … stick to it! Who’s gonna stop you?