Lawmakers urge (DEMAND) Trump to appoint White House Jewish liaison

“Trump were truly as cozy with Judea, Inc as some allege, why has he broken with tradition by not filling this seat as his predecessors all have?”
Because Trump filled the Judea seat with himself and Jarrad! Why create an indirect line when a direct line exists?
ed note–wrong. The only way to entertain any semblance of notion that Trump is owned by the Jews is to completely IGNORE the wall of screeching that organized Jewish interests have leveled against him since the campaign.

“The only way to entertain any semblance of notion that Trump is owned by the Jews is to completely IGNORE the wall of screeching that organized Jewish interests have leveled against him since the campaign.”
I disagree for three reasons.
First, the “wall of screeching” against Nixon reached dizzying heights too, despite Nixon’s implementation of the Jewish agenda. See “Nixon Richard: The Man Behind the Mask” by Gary Allen (1982).
Second, the “wall of screeching” in large part is because of Trump’s symbolism: The white-Christian patriarchy opposed to open borders, etc. Symbolism is no less evil to the elitists!
Third, the opposition to Trump by elitists is largely manufactured (forget about the useful idiots at the street level) in an effort to force Trump’s supporters “to circle the wagons” and preserve Trump’s hidden subservience to international Jewry. Recall that the same elitists created Hamas and ISIS for the same purpose. I’m only surprised that the Ugly Truth writes about the former, while blind to the latter!

ed note–the opposition to Trump by ‘elitists’ is as much a ‘largely manufactured’ event as the wall of screeching against Nixon was ‘manufactured’. Indeed, it was and is the real deal and being done with the same end goal in mind–seeing a spirited stallion taken off the political playing field and I am surprised that you cannot see the glaring (and frankly, embarrassing) inconsistencies within your own position–you claim that the wall of screeching against Nixon was ‘largely manufactured’, but yet in the end, the Jews got what they wanted and Nixon was gone, so if indeed it was ‘manufactured’, than why did it succeed?.
As I/we have said on numerous occasions here, this is the problem with a ‘movement’ that claims to be ‘Jew-wise’–they are all gas pedal and no brake. As such, many within it are incapable of avoiding head-on collisions with the facts due to their unwillingness/inability to recognize the nuances that by definition MUST exist in the complex world of modern politics where powerful organized Jewish interest are involved. Had all the same members of the ‘Trump is owned by the Jews’ brigade been around in 1960 and watched/listened as another spirited stallion named JFK made all the noises/maneuvers he made then in securing Jewish support for his presidency, they would have completely missed those earth-shaking countermoves that took place after he took over and instead would have found themselves in league with those who claimed that he was working to bring about the ‘New World Order’.

Why is there no statute enforcing the role of “envoy” to protect ALL other religious denominations?
OH, I SEE; we have separation of church and state, but NOT for Jews. They’re another protected class. Some ARE created more equal than others.

Your response (and probably underlying ideology) fails to distinguish the infighting between Zionists and Globalists or the New World Order – a possible explanation for the “inconsistencies” within my comment. And my recognition of this schism dispels my “unwillingness/inability to recognize the nuances that by definition MUST exist in the complex world of modern politics where powerful organized Jewish interests[s] are involved.”
Like Eisenhower, JFK was a committed Globalist (see e.g., The Politics of Surrender by Medford Stanton Evans, Devin-Adair Co., 1966) critical of Zionism but wholly committed to Globalism. The Zionists won and JFK is dead. I would apply the same analysis to Nixon: critical of Zionism but wholly committed to Globalism. “In the end, the [Zionist] Jews got what they wanted and Nixon was gone.”
Often, but not always, the goals of Zionists and Globalists overlap. Of course, many of our worst adversaries are best described as Zionists AND Globalists, i.e., open borders here and everywhere white, while closed borders for Israel.
Any reference to the Globalist JFK or the Zionist Trump as “spirited stallion[s],” however, is the essence of “embarrassing” rhetoric! JFK was a Globalist stooge and Trump is a Zionist stooge. That Trump is a Zionist stooge AND a Globalist stooge is certainly possible: Both ideologies, however, pose a threat to thinking Gentiles!
(By the way, I cannot re-post any of your articles to Facebook because of the admission at the top of your web site: “Intelligent ‘anti-Semitism’ for thinking Gentiles,” opting instead to re-post the original source – gleaned of your often scholarly analysis. None of my friends will read material that admits to anti-Semitism!)
ed note–Please stay on point. The question being debated is not whether JFK was a globalist or whether Trump is a zionist. The question being debated is whether there is a concerted effort on the part of organized Jewish interests to get rid of Trump or else to render him politically impotent so that he cannot move forward with his plans vis a vis a resolution to the Palestinian situation. And yes, JFK was a ‘spirited stallion’, which is why he was murdered by Judea, Inc, unless of course you want to try and make the argument that it wasn’t Israel responsible for his assassination, in which case I would recommend you read Mike Piper’s book Final Judgment.
As far as the other, I regret that you are unable to post things from TUT on fb, although I have no problem with it. As far as your friends go, perhaps you need to trade them in for some new ones who react to things with a little less emotionalism and a little more rationalism.
thank you for the compliment nonetheless.