the jewish brain final

Ed-note (Sabba) – I have heard him bash Christianity and Islam but not judaism.Does anyone know if he has also spat his venom on the synagogue of satan?

THE ALGEMEINER

The usually self-assured biologist, author and atheist Richard Dawkins expressed his bewilderment at the disproportionate amount of Nobel prizes won by Jews in a recent interview with the New Republic, saying he is “intrigued by” the  “phenomenally high” number of Jewish laureates.

Addressing the controversy surrounding a Tweet he wrote during the conferment of Nobel prizes earlier this month, Dawkins offered up something of a mea culpa, stating: “That was unfortunate. I should have compared religion with religion and compared Islam not with Trinity College but with Jews, because the number of Jews who have won Nobel Prizes is phenomenally high.”

Continuing, he said: “Race does not come into it. It is pure religion and culture. Something about the cultural tradition of Jews is way, way more sympathetic to science and learning and intellectual pursuits than Islam. That would have been a fair comparison. Ironically, I originally wrote the tweet with Jews and thought,That might give offense. And so I thought I better change it.”

Asked why he thought it is that Jews have won so many Nobel Prizes, Dawkins was forthright with his uncertainty.

“I haven’t thought it through. I don’t know. But I don’t think it is a minor thing; it is colossal. I think more than 20 percent of Nobel Prizes have been won by Jews.”

According to the Jewish Virtual Library, since the Nobel was first awarded in 1901 approximately 193 of the 855 honorees have been Jewish (22%). Jews make up less than 0.2% of the global population.

This year 6 of 12 laureates were Jewish. The 13th laureate, for the Nobel Peace Prize, was awarded to an organization and not an individual.

0 thoughts on “LOL!!! Richard Dawkins Perplexed by High Number of Jewish Nobel Prize "Winners"”
  1. I thought it was rather well-known by now that the only theists that Dawkins really bashes are the monotheisti Muslims. Indeed, it would seem this is the real target, not theism in general or monotheism in particular.

  2. I don’t think Dawkins is bashing the ‘jews’ or even questioning them, their religion, or their so called culture.
    To me, his statements seem to place the so called ‘jew culture’ (not a race, he said) In an atmosphere of superiority because, in his views, it is “way, way more sympathetic to science and learning and intellectual pursuits than Islam.”.
    He also inserteth the other foot in mouth with, ” It is pure religion and culture. “. This statement proceeds the one above in my second paragraph.
    So in order he says, ” It is pure religion and culture. Something about the cultural tradition of Jews is way, way more sympathetic to science and learning and intellectual pursuits than Islam. “.
    Where is his evidence that Islam is not?? What specifically are his criteria for the determination that ‘jew’ culture (traditionally or otherwise) is more “sympathetic”? And what is his definition of this “sympathetic”? I think what he really is trying to put over on people is that he thinks the ‘jew’ culture / religion ( he did use these two terms in the same sentence) are superior..AND not just in comparison to Islam. Islam is just his handy little stage prop. He want s to mean that ‘jew’ culture / religion is SUPERIOR (not ‘sympathetic) to ALL other cultures and / or religions on planet Earth.
    I really dislike it when people use general terms such as science, learning, intellectual pursuits, religions, the religious, the government, etc. It’s basically sloppy. Fact is there are scientific, religious, and intellectual egg heads. There are also ‘good’ people within. And there are many, many subdivisions within each.
    Dawkins is being vague, but he is definitely promoting the ‘jew’. That much DID come out of his thoughts. He buries the centuries of facts, yet promotes in ethereal vagueness.

  3. He is equating Nobel Prize winners to being superior. I forgot to mention that.
    So since Dawkins highlights the number of ‘jews’, to him…a Nobel winner equates to superiority. Consequently then (according to Dawkins) it MUST BE the ‘jew’ culture & religion that sets them apart.
    SO…….to all those ‘jew’ Nobel prize winners. You take home the trophy because your yhwh loves rape, butcheries, molestations, theft, pedophilia, lies, enslaving the Goy, creating funny money, usary, etc, etc. And…..Dawkins stands with ya on every single one of those facts. It’s puuuuuuure religion…’jew’ style. And..there’s no room for any so called ‘intellectual’ debate because afterall….it’s all tradition. Yep, a ‘pure’ religious AND cultural tradition that makes the ‘jew’ superiority.
    Dawkins, the King of the Atheists bends over, looks between his knees, and says, “I’m an atheist yhwy but take me home big fellah”.

  4. In general, most run of the mill atheists are not shy about opposing Judaism. It’s always in the context and under the blanket of criticizing all Abrahamic religions, though so that way they can dodge the anti-semite charge. They also usually avoid pointing out any specific criticisms.
    Now most atheists who use media platforms to hawk their wares know better. In their world, “religion” means only Christianity or Islam. “Judaism? What’s that? Oh really, never heard of it.”
    Or they may even mildly praise Judaism in brief statements like I heard one Atheist a TED Talk over the Christmas holiday a few years back. He said that there were aspects of Judaism he really liked and as an atheist, approved of. British guy; wish I could remember his name.

  5. Yes he is that’s why I put the word winner in between quotation marks! That’s also why I chose that pic which shows what a jewish brain is really made of! I am very much like you: I hate it when a so called scientist speaks in general terms about things he knows nothing about (for example, Islam). His arguments are so easily destroyed it should be a subject of embarassment for his ‘scientific’ brain.
    He makes statements like there is nothing beyond the material universe, there is no life after death: how does he know it?
    This is as much a non-rational belief, non-proven by scientific method as is the belief in God.
    He is to me yet another charlatan parading as a scientist.

  6. Interesting Dawkins but no dice…As an “Atheist” (actually I don’t like put in any box, I’m simply a non-believer, YouTube comedian George Carlin “Religion is Bullshit” and Peter Joseph from Zeitgeist’s very interesting that all Religions originated from Sun Adoration…I lean towards Nature too) but if Dawkins is bucking Jewishness eff him…he’s an out and out hypocrite. As for saying Anti-Semite (95% of World Jewry the Ashkenazim Jews are NOT Semites…the real Semites…sons and daughters of Shem, and even the Sephardi Jews are NOT Semites…and to me the Jews originated the so-called Abrahamic Mono-theistic Faiths like Christianity (Jesus was Jewish) and Islam (some say Mohammed was Jewish) But to see Richard Dawkins favoring the Jews is a lot of BS…We don’t know if the Rothschild Criminals buy off the Nobel Committee’s so that they can award Jews the Nobel Prize…I think probably…so they and Dawkins can say “Look, many Jews have won the Nobel Prize…look at Jew Obama winning the Peace Prize, and for cryin’ out loud supreme War criminal Henry Kissinger getting a Nobel Prize….Holy Shalom….
    And why doesn’t Richard Dawkins ever speak out about Male (and Female) Genital Mutilation or Circumcision. I’ve never heard him speak out about this? Maybe Richard if you’re reading this check out these two excellent websites that tell the world about the horrors of Genital Mutilation. http://www.NoCirc.org or http://www.SexAsNatureIntendedIt.com. And what about Muslims learning Circumcision from the Jews although the Jews pass it off and say…we learned it from the Ancient Egyptians. The Jews perpetuate circumcision the most on this planet…
    Chess Champion (non-Jewish and UN-circumcised) said it best. “I believe the ONLY road to sanity for the Jews to admit that circumcision is a crime. If a Jew will never admit that he will NEVER be on the road to sanity”
    ~Bobby Fischer, World Chess Champion
    http://www.RobertJamesFischer.blogspot.com

  7. My impression is that Jews tend to marry and have children with other Jews. That makes them a race. The Jewish culture produces selective pressure for high IQ’s. That is, the goal of parents is for their offspring to marry up the social ladder, which means marry up the IQ ladder. This is a Darwinian analysis and I am surprised that Dawkins did not mention this. But the academy functions as a severe mistress. Talking about racial differences is a good way to lose a job and tenure at the univerisity. Dawkins would not be the first guy to go down.

  8. Judaism and science and technology and industry and commerce and the arts and … – what do they have in common? Money! Starve any of these areas of human activity of funds and nothing happens. Favoured research is lavishly funded. Disfavoured research will not be funded, and disfavoured researchers will be victimized. Jews dominate the world because they dominate the institution of money. They finance all wars, and they use money as a means of waging war against nations designated as enemies. If you want to do something about the Jewish problem, take away the source of their undoubted power!

  9. Hmmm
    That the Noble Prize is rigged is hardly news. It is rather like asking why the Ivy league continues to maintain a student body that is 25% Jewish when they are barely 3% of the US population. It is not due to any inherent “superiority” in intellect and performance. (large numbers of non Jewish applicants display similar and comparable credentials, yet are not accepted) It appears to be due primarily to the fact that there is a gross over-representation in terms of the number of Jewish members of the Faculty and administration in those particular schools. Generally speaking the statistics don’t lie; Again generally speaking, in post secondary schools in the US there is a consistent correlation between the over representation of Jewish members of the faculty/administration, and the over representation of Jewish members of the student body. There is another correlation which is rather consistent between donor contributions and admissions as well.
    It bears restating the obvious here: Gathering factual information and drawing logical conclusions based on those facts IS NOT Anti-Semitic.

  10. . Paul Johnson chastises the modern Western historians:
    “Unfortunately, historians are rarely as objective as they wish to appear. Biblical history, which for Christians, Jews and atheists alike involves beliefs or prejudices which go to the very root of our being, is an area where objectivity is peculiarly difficult, if not impossible, to achieve.” [Our emphasis]
    And so does John William Draper in his momentous work, “The History of the Intellectual Development of Europe” :
    “I have to deplore the systematic manner in which the literature of Europe has contrived to put out of sight our scientific obligations to the Mohammedans. Surely they can not be much longer hidden. Injustice founded on religious rancour and national conceit can not be perpetuated forever. What should the modern astronomer say when, remembering the contemporary barbarism of Europe, he finds the Arab Abdul Hassan speaking of tubes, to the extremities which ocular and objective dioptres, perhaps sights, were attached, as used at Meragha? ……The Arab has left his intellectual impress on Europe, as, before long, Christendom will have to confess; he has indelibly written it on the heavens, as any one may see who reads the names of the stars on a common celestial globe.”
    He goes on to say that: The Arabs have given the world advanced knowledge in every field, be it in Botany; irrigation; textile fabrics; iron; steel; rice; sugar; breeding of sheep, cattle and horses; flood gates; wheels; pumps; the compass; time keeping pieces and the list goes on and on.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading