Newly leaked quotes from Netanyahu reveal his rationale for firing head of Shin Bet

Netanyahu criticized Bar’s public support for a state commission of inquiry into the October 7 failures, citing it as one of the main reasons for his dismissal.

ed note–as always, a tidal wave of important info that every war-weary Gentile with a vested interest in his/her own future survival needs to understand about all of this.

Firsto, ladies and Gentile-men, we now have the basic outline here as to what the ‘back story’ is in all of this business with Netanyahu’s decision to dismiss Bar from Shin Bet–

Bar’s support for/insistence upon creating a state commission of inquiry into the October 7 ‘failures’.

Now, we put that word ‘failures’ into quotation marks for a very specific reason ladies and Gentile-men, that reason being he fact that there were no ‘failures’ that led to the Oct. 7th attacks by Hamas.

It was, in a word, ‘brilliant’ and went off EXACTLY as Netanyahu and his fellow ghouls planned. It–just like that other ‘brilliant’ operation taking place on 9/11/2001 in the US–resulted in EXACTLY what the Pirates of Judea needed in order to get the ‘war to end all wars’ started so as to birth that ‘thing’ that the terrorists of Torah Judah-ism have been planning now for the last 3,000 years, ‘Greater Israel’.

Now, exactly WHY Bar supports this ‘state commission of inquiry’ is a bit murky. Doubtless that as head of Shin Bet he ran the various cells of Mistaarvim spies embedded in Gaza that not only provided Israel with ‘eyes only’ intelligence concerning the impending attacks, but as well, engaged in all the various acts of terrorism that have become part of the ‘lyric and lore’ of what is said to have taken place viz rapes, beheaded babies, children thrown into ovens, etc, etc, etc, and as such, has plenty of dirt under his fingernails and blood on his hands as well.

The one possible explanation as to why he would turn against Netanyahu and support the same ‘state commission of inquiry’ that Netanyahu cites as his reason for dismissing Bar is that Bar has ‘cut a deal’ to provide state’s evidence AGAINST NETANYAHU in return for immunity.

The bottom line is this though, ladies and Gentile-men–

There were no ‘failures’ that led to Oct. 7th. Israel not only KNEW about the impending attacks, but made sure to aggrandize and amplify the events of that day in order to secure the ‘sympathy’ of the world as she launched her plans for WWIII/Armageddon, and had the peoples of the world realized this fact from the beginning and made known their opposition to it in the most vocal manner possible then perhaps the extermination of as many as a quarter of a million innocent human beings in Gaza would not have taken place.

Anna Barsky for Jpost

Newly leaked quotes from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during Thursday night’s cabinet meeting reveal the rationale behind the decision to dismiss Shin Bet head Ronen Bar. At the end of the meeting, government ministers voted in favor of terminating Bar’s role.

According to sources familiar with the meeting, Netanyahu criticized Bar’s public support for a state commission of inquiry into the October 7 failures, citing it as one of the main reasons for his dismissal.

‘It’s possible to listen to and consider proposals,’ Netanyahu was quoted as saying. ‘But it’s unacceptable for the head of the Shin Bet to publicly promote one of the paths for inquiry committees. He should tell me this in a private conversation and not drag the organization into political matters.’

The prime minister also questioned Bar’s professional conduct.

‘He is manipulating the word ‘trust,’’ Netanyahu said. ‘He knows I’m not demanding ‘personal loyalty.’ I have to be able to look him in the eyes and rely on him both professionally and personally, without reservations, when approving sensitive operations.’

Netanyahu continued: ‘Government ministers – can anyone imagine that we will continue working without trust because of a court order? That cannot happen, and it will not happen.’

Bar’s letter to ministers

Despite being invited to the cabinet meeting, Bar did not attend. Instead, he sent a sharply worded four-page letter addressed to the ministers. In the letter, Bar accused Netanyahu of having personal motives for the dismissal, suggesting it was linked to efforts to avoid investigations rather than any professional failings on his part.

‘Personal interests, aimed at preventing the pursuit of truth – both regarding the events and concerning the failure cases currently being investigated by the Shin Bet,’ Bar wrote.

Bar also addressed the working relationship between the security agency and the political echelon.

‘In practice, and contrary to claims, since I assumed my role – and even more so since the start of the war on various fronts – there has been intensive and effective cooperation between the agency and the prime minister,’ he wrote. ‘This has led to significant success in thwarting terrorism and advancing the war’s goals. The prime minister has acknowledged this on several occasions, including in public statements. The agency implements the policy set by the political echelon and will continue to do so.’

Justice Minister Yariv Levin said during the meeting that Bar’s conduct left the government with no alternative.

‘Ronen Bar left us no choice. It’s not just the letter – it’s his entire conduct,’ Levin said. ‘This shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the system of governance and complete disregard. When you’re summoned to a cabinet meeting, you show up.’

Levin added that the main issue was the prime minister’s lack of trust in Bar but cited additional concerns, such as how Bar handled incidents of military insubordination and what he described as ‘selective enforcement.’

‘Nothing undermines national security and democratic order more than people who reject the will of the voters, call for insubordination, and disrupt the state,’ Levin said. ‘He did nothing about it.’

Transportation Minister Miri Regev said Bar’s conduct reflects a broader power struggle between elected officials and the civil service.

‘There’s something bigger here – the tension between the sovereign, which is the people and the government, and the dictatorship of the bureaucracy,’ Regev said. ‘The media, as part of the junta, has mobilized on behalf of those who want to topple the government.’

She also criticized Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara for inaction and accused former Supreme Court President Aharon Barak of ‘calling for civil war.’

Regarding the October 7 Hamas attack, Regev questioned how the Shin Bet failed to gather intelligence on the hostages and claimed Bar failed to raise red flags during security cabinet meetings.

‘In this reality, it is our authority and our responsibility to end his tenure,’ Regev said. ‘I call on the prime minister to bring a permanent Shin Bet chief to the government on Sunday.’

Foreign Minister Israel Katz also expressed disappointment in Bar, particularly over his decision to skip the cabinet meeting.

‘Ronen Bar said he accepts responsibility, but he must also act on it like Herzi Halevi did,’ Katz said, referencing the IDF Chief of Staff. ‘This process is harming the organization. I was shocked to read Ronen Bar’s letter. If you choose not to attend a government meeting, then essentially, you don’t recognize the government’s authority.’