OBAMA RAHM EMANUEL TITANIC

ISRAEL NATIONAL NEWS – The former Director of the Nobel Institute for 25 years wrote in a memoir released Wednesday that the decision in 2009 to give then newly elected US President Barack Obama the Nobel Peace Prize and over $1 million was a mistake.

In his memoir “Secretary of Peace: 25 Years with the Nobel Prize,” Geir Lundestad wrote that the idea behind the unanimous decision of the five-member Norwegian Nobel Committee to give Obama the prize was to encourage him to achieve his goals, according to Norway’s The Local.

But in his memoir, Lundestad said Obama’s actions since then proved that decision to be flawed, writing: “in hindsight, we could say that the argument of giving Obama a helping hand was only partially correct.”

Lundestad, who stepped down in 2014 from the committee, wrote that Obama himself said at the time that he was “surprised” by the prize.

At the presentation ceremony, Obama said, “I accept this honor with gratitude and humility,” even while admitting: “I have no clear solutions to conflicts around the world.” A survey by the Norwegian University of Kinifk conducted at the time found only 26% of Americans thought Obama deserved to win.

“Even many of Obama’s supporters thought that the prize was a mistake. In that way, the committee did not achieve what it had hoped,” Lundestad wrote.

In a further revelation, the Nobel director wrote that Obama’s advisers covertly asked if the president could get out of the award.

“His cabinet had already asked whether anyone had previously refused to travel to Oslo to receive the prize. In broad strokes, the answer was no,” recalled Lundestad.

It appears the current Nobel committee may be poised to make a similarly questionable move, after US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in July were recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize for their work on the Iran nuclear deal.

The potential peace prize, if granted to the two, would come despite warnings that the deal may trigger a nuclear arms race in the Middle East, and despite Iran’s insistence that it’s basic hostility towards Israel and the west remains as strong as ever.

As dubious as the award given to Obama just after his election was, perhaps even more controversial was the prize awarded to Yasser Arafat, the founder of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and an arch-terrorist responsible for the murder of hundreds of Israelis.

Arafat was given the prize together with then-Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin after the 1993 Oslo Accords.

0 thoughts on “Nobel Prize Director Admits Obama Award Was a Mistake”
  1. With the twisted logic in this article, you needn’t tell me it was written by a Jew. Speaking of the Iran agreement the author wrote “The potential peace prize, if granted to the two, would come despite warnings that the deal may trigger a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.” Who would the race be between? The only country with nuclear arms in the middle east is Israel and they are borderline insane. And then the Jew says Arafat was a murderer, but neglects to mention Menachem Begin was a mass murderer, terrorist head of Irgun and he received a Nobel Prize Peace. The difference is Begin was one of the invaders, Arafat was defending his homeland.

    The awarding of a Nobel to Obama was not “partially correct,” it was completely incorrect. You don’t award someone a prize, hoping they will do something to earn it in the future. They have tarnished the value of the Nobel Peace Prize. It is now worthless and I’m not sure how they can fix that.

  2. Interesting to read this admission, although it is somewhat overdue.I sent this message to the Nobel committee October 15, 2011.

    From: ray***@*********.ca
    To: postmaster@nobel.no; library@nobel.no
    Subject: Peace Prize/War Prize
    Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:35:33 +0000

    Honourable Members of the Nobel Committee,

    Considering the speeches candidate Obama gave before the Global Financial Meltdown-Economic Pearl Harbour-Tsunami of September 2008 under the watch of his predecessor, I was happy when your august Committee awarded the new President the Nobel Peace Prize.

    I supposed at that Time, you awarded it to him knowing the mess he inherited would leave him holding the bag, and at a great disadvantage with the American people to start with, and you hoped awarding him such a prestigious award at the outset of his Presidency might ameliorate the disadvantage of inheriting a failed economy and in those circumstances, help keep him focused on the Prize of Peace.

    I am positive I am not the only resident of earth to see the difference between the words of Candidate Obama and the inexperienced new President Obama you awarded the Peace Prize to, and his actions since then. Since being given the Prize, his actions on the world stage show he resorts to military action 1st and not as a last resort. He is showing by his actions to be undeserving of The Nobel Peace Prize.

    I may not be the 1st person to write to you about this, but I see justifiable reasons to recall the Peace Prize awarded to President Obama prematurely in wishful thinking. He is showing himself by his policies to be unworthy of it. If you can’t take it back, at least make a Public Statement saying in retrospect, The Committee made a hasty decision.

    What moved me Today to write to you was reading the latest article in the Blog of Professor Richard Falk, International Law Scholar titled ‘
    Missing the Point Twice: International Law as Empire’s Sunday Suit
    http://richardfalk.wordpress.com/2011/10/15/missing-the-point-twice-international-law-as-empire%e2%80%99s-sunday-suit/#comment-4783

    Peace
    Ray Joseph Cormier

    GENERAL/PRESIDENT DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER – The Last Real Commander-In-Chief
    http://ray032.wordpress.com/2011/09/04/generalpresident-dwight-d-eisenhower-the-last-real-commander-in-chief/

  3. Yes. After 6 years now they say he does not deserve it. All this is a Jewish plot to make him appear that he is a good boy. Obama never deserved the prize and after escalating all these wars for the Zionist cabal, I thhink he needs to return the prize.

  4. The Nobel prize has forever lost its value. As long as international Jewery has an overwhelming financial say among the politicians of the West, there is ZERO hope of the Nobel peace prize ever regaining its stature.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading