Screaming like a stuck pig, Judea warns that POTUS DJT’s Iran talks could ‘backfire and strengthen the regime’

Senior Iran researcher says ‘Premature optimism may encourage Tehran to accelerate its nuclear program or renege on a deal.’

ed note–as always, lots of ‘must knows’ that every Gentile with a vested interest in his/her own future survival needs to understand about this.

Firsto, ladies and Gentile-men, an ugly yet undeniable truth that needs to be understood in a FOUNDATIONAL WAY is that the Jews LOVE war and LOVE human death. Everything about the ‘yahweh-ism’ that has driven their behavior for the last 3,000 years has demonstrated this fact beyond any reasonable doubt, beginning with Cain murdering his brother Abel and moving on to Joshua slaying the Amalekites and Canaanites. Their major religious celebrations, from Passover to H’nookah to Purim, are all celebrations of Gentile slaughter, no different than the celebration that has been taking place on the streets of Israel and on the social media accounts of Jews worldwide since the bloodbath of Gentiles in Gaza began 18 months ago.

Now, as far as Iran goes, nota bene the following–

The Jews as a religious group have been planning on Iran’s total destruction for the last 2,500 years as evidenced by their yearly celebration of Purim, where they believe their genocidal ancestors mass murdered 75,000 Persians. It is the most festive of all their yearly celebrations of Gentile-cide, where they are commanded, RELIGIOUSLY COMMANDED, to get falling-down drunk and eat pastries made out to resemble the body parts–ears, eyes, hands, INTERNAL ORGANS, of their Persian enemies.

There isn’t a ‘religion’ like this anywhere else on earth, the only possible exception being those cannibals in Africa who eat their human victims in order to get superhuman strength.

Now, as far as what Israel’s real aim here is, nota bene the following.

Netanyahu knows Iran isn’t developing nuclear weapons. This is just the excuse he uses–as he did with the destruction of Iraq–in seducing the Gentile brain into doing the Jews’ dirty work of mass murder for them.

POTUS DJT however isn’t ‘buying it’ and isn’t as enthusiastic about the prospect of WWIII as a whole horde of ‘experts’ across the ‘alternative media’ claim. Quite the contrary, just as he promised in his campaign, he is out to prevent wars, and the process of negotiating a new ‘nuclear deal’ with Iran is part of keeping that promise.

And no, ladies and Gentile-men, it isn’t ‘all just an act’ as doubtless various ‘experts’ across the alternative media will claim, assuming they haven’t already.

The bottom line however is that Netanyahu and his gang of Armageddonists are not going to be deterred from bringing about the ultimate ‘Purim’ celebration that they have been planning now for the last 2,500 years, and so the obvious question that must be asked is as follows–

WHAT ARE THESE YAHWEH-ISTS GOING TO DO IN ‘FLIPPING THE SCRIPT’ AND IN TRYING TO FORCE THE HAND OF POTUS DJT IN GETTING WWIII/ARMAGEDDON STARTED?

Another one of these?

Or another one of THESE?

Or another one of THESE?

Or possibly a combination of all the above?

The mind boggles and the heart flutters when considering it all, but the one thing as sure as shinola is that they are going to try and do SOMETHING, because they have made their ‘plans’ and are not going to be deterred by some Goy political leader out to save humanity from its own destruction.

Jpost

US President Donald Trump’s approach to the direct talks between Iran and the United States over Iran’s nuclear program could lead to dangerous consequences, Dr. Benny Sabti, a senior Iran researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), told Maariv on Monday.

Sabti harshly criticizes President Trump’s optimistic remarks and argues, ‘He made a very big mistake by already calling the talks good,’ saying this signals weakness and could strengthen Iran’s position.

While Iran seeks sanctions relief, the reality is more complicated. ‘It’s important to emphasize that the United States isn’t even talking about easing sanctions yet. It’s actually imposing more sanctions, and that’s what really infuriates the Iranians and raises their suspicions about the negotiations,’ Sabti explained.

The danger, he said, lies in a potential future lifting of sanctions: ‘If the sanctions are really lifted, Iran could trade with many countries. Even partial relief could open the door to major waves of import and export and a drop in foreign currency rates. This could result in a very sudden and critical shift in favor of the Iranian economy—ultimately strengthening the regime.’

One of the more troubling aspects of the emerging draft agreement is that it does not include the full dismantlement of Iran’s nuclear program. Sabti strongly criticized this direction: ‘Trump, at least at this stage, seems to be leading toward the same agreement that was reached in 2014–2015—the one he himself pulled out of. That’s a huge loss. It’s a bit foolish.’

Wrong approach to diplomacy?

The core issue, in his view, is the Western approach: ‘When you leave them with a little, they become bold and eventually want it all, not just a portion. It also signals a certain kind of Western weakness. If you leave me with a bit, it means you can leave me with more. You have to talk to them in terms of all or nothing—and even be willing to go to war.’

The involvement of Oman as a mediator has special significance, Sabti explained: ‘Oman has had very good ties with Iran for decades, even before the revolution. It’s convenient for both sides—and also geographically close to Iran. You can quickly jump over for consultations and return.’

Regarding disagreements within the Iranian parliament, Sabti shed light on what’s happening behind the scenes: ‘The Iranian parliament hasn’t been an independent body for many years—perhaps since the 1990s. It has no real standing of its own. The discourse there is all just one big show. The Iranian regime is trying to put on an act that it’s struggling to compromise.’

Sabti circled back to President Trump’s optimistic comments and spoke critically: ‘I think he made a very big mistake by already calling the talks good. That’s not true at all. You can’t possibly know what happened during the two hours of talks. How can you expect to reach results in two-hour rounds of talks each week?’ The result, he warns, could be disastrous: ‘The Iranians will feel they can accelerate their nuclear plans without conceding to the Americans. That’s not good at all. The Americans will pay the price—and so will we—for this naivety.’

More broadly, the implications of the current negotiations extend beyond US-Iran relations to the entire Middle East. Strengthening the Iranian regime could become ‘a threat to the region, to us, to Saudi Arabia,’ Sabti said, especially when ‘we haven’t even gotten anything in return yet.’