2 thoughts on “Senior Russian MP: Israel must ‘learn to live’ with Russia-US agreement on Syria ceasefire”
“That is why, it would be more reasonable for Tel Aviv not to come down on the already reached agreement between Russia and the US, but instead find ways how to live with this and reap benefits from victory over Islamic State (a terrorist group outlawed in Russia) which are clear for all countries of the region,” Kosachev said…
“Earlier, Netanyahu said Israel would hail real cessation of hostilities in Syria.”
The problem is, Judea, Inc. cannot be “reasonable” since their idea of “cessation of hostilities” is to eradicate any opposition to their plans. Judea, Inc.’s definition of peace is, no resistance. And victory over Islamic State means (likely temporary) victory over Judea, Inc. Where are the “benefits” in that; am-I-right?
“That is why, it would be more reasonable for Tel Aviv not to come down on the already reached agreement between Russia and the US, but instead find ways how to live with this and reap benefits from victory over Islamic State (a terrorist group outlawed in Russia) which are clear for all countries of the region,” Kosachev said.
“Earlier, Netanyahu said Israel would hail real cessation of hostilities in Syria.”
Judea, Inc. cannot act “reasonable” because their definition of “peace” in the region is lack of all opposition to their plans. That is Bibi’s definition of ‘real cessation of hostilities in Syria.”
So, a (likely temporary) victory over Islamic State is a setback for Judea, Inc. and is seen by the Jews to have few “benefits”. Of course, never let a crisis go to waste. I’m sure there are several plans for just such contingencies.
“That is why, it would be more reasonable for Tel Aviv not to come down on the already reached agreement between Russia and the US, but instead find ways how to live with this and reap benefits from victory over Islamic State (a terrorist group outlawed in Russia) which are clear for all countries of the region,” Kosachev said…
“Earlier, Netanyahu said Israel would hail real cessation of hostilities in Syria.”
The problem is, Judea, Inc. cannot be “reasonable” since their idea of “cessation of hostilities” is to eradicate any opposition to their plans. Judea, Inc.’s definition of peace is, no resistance. And victory over Islamic State means (likely temporary) victory over Judea, Inc. Where are the “benefits” in that; am-I-right?
“That is why, it would be more reasonable for Tel Aviv not to come down on the already reached agreement between Russia and the US, but instead find ways how to live with this and reap benefits from victory over Islamic State (a terrorist group outlawed in Russia) which are clear for all countries of the region,” Kosachev said.
“Earlier, Netanyahu said Israel would hail real cessation of hostilities in Syria.”
Judea, Inc. cannot act “reasonable” because their definition of “peace” in the region is lack of all opposition to their plans. That is Bibi’s definition of ‘real cessation of hostilities in Syria.”
So, a (likely temporary) victory over Islamic State is a setback for Judea, Inc. and is seen by the Jews to have few “benefits”. Of course, never let a crisis go to waste. I’m sure there are several plans for just such contingencies.