ed note–as always, lots of ‘must knows’ that every war-weary Gentile with a vested interest in his/her own future survival needs to understand about all of this.
Firsto, ladies and Gentile-men, a ‘protocol’ that must be understood when deciphering any thorny issue where the Jews are involved, which is that as far as they are concerned, the only rule that applies is that they win, at all costs.
As they have clearly demonstrated now for the last 3,000 years, they do not fight fair nor enter into any contest ‘mano a mano’ with the understanding that in the end, the ‘best man’ will win.
Instead, the tactics that they employ, learned of course from their father, the Devil (the words of Jesus Christ, not ours, so take it up with Him if you don’t like it) is that ‘desperate times call for desperate measures’, and since losing is by definition an ‘ELE’, meaning an Extinction Level Event with them, WHATEVER must be done to win, no matter how small or seemingly insignificant the contest, ‘so mote it be’.
Now, having said all of this, let us put under the microscope the panicked arguments of the deceptive Jew who wrote the piece below and how it serves as prima facie evidence of the state of utter shamelessness that pervades the Judaic psyche and how the members of this substratum of humanity will say anything, ANYTHING, to try and win the argument taking place within the court of public opinion.
Firsto, ladies and Gentile-men, let the following fact sink in–the only reason that the POTUS has decided upon the ‘heavy-handed’ measures that he has in bringing an international ‘peacekeeping’ force into Gaza is because of the complete lawlessness of the Jews. As DJT himself stated, if these measures are not taken, the Jews will just go on, and on, and ON in their religiously-commanded mass murder, because like sharks that smell blood in the water, the Jews cannot contain their violent impulses once the black mass begins, and the rest of the sane world knows this.
But the Jews know that they can’t have this kind of ‘conversation’ with the sane world and expect it to work. They cannot admit to the world that they are a substratum of vampires that are spiritually driven to drain the blood of innocent Gentiles, so instead, the ‘conversation’ has to be about ‘sovereignty’ and the ‘rights’ of a nation.
Nota bene the following–
‘…Only one flag should command authority on a nation’s soil…’
As if this–
And this–
…Did not demonstrate clearly how another ‘flag’ governs the affairs of the United States…
Nexto–
‘When foreign troops operate from your soil, the ultimate decision-making authority shifts to the foreign capital whose soldiers are deployed.’
Again, as if AIPAC, ADL, thousands of Christian Zionist churches, the media, and just about every other lever of power within American society DOES NOT represent ‘foreign soldiers’ operating on US soil and making decisions that affect the entire nation.
Again, ladies and Gentile-men, if it is one thing that ‘they’ do well, it is lying and seducing the Gentile brain with clever verbiage.
Nexto–
‘When orders come from two different capitals, there is no guarantee they will align, and especially under fire…’
Again, fellow Gentiles, a corollary to the arguments appearing above, which is that the Jews are not in the LEAST bit worried when THEY operate as a subversive 5th column within America (or any other Gentile nation) and leverage direct control over what kinds of policies are implemented whose only beneficiary is the Jewish State.
The bottom line to all of this, ladies and Gentile-men, is that the entire ‘Jewish State’ experiment has proved itself, once again, just as it has in all previous instances, to be an impossibility. Giving them any ‘state’ to govern their affairs in a responsible manner is like putting a blind man behind the wheel of a passenger jet and expecting it NOT to go up in flames shortly thereafter. They have never demonstrated the capacity for civilized behavior, and in every case going back for the last 3,000 years where they held ‘sovereign’ state power, they have engaged in the very same behavior that the world has witnessed since before 1948, i.e. murder and mayhem of the innocent peoples forced to live in close proximity to them.
They are as uncivilized and, more importantly, as UNCIVILIZABLE as crocodiles and/or venomous serpents, and the only safe place for them to exist is behind the protective bars of a zoo where their chances of escape and breakout are made impossible.
Israel National News
The United States is Israel’s most important ally. That is not in dispute. The military cooperation, intelligence partnership, shared values and shared enemies form one of the most successful strategic relationships in modern history.
But friendship, even profound friendship, does not suspend the laws of sovereignty. It does not change the meaning of borders. And it does not eliminate the core principle that every nation must protect, that only one flag should command authority on a nation’s soil.
Much has been written about the dangers of permanently stationing U.S. military forces on Israeli territory, even for the most benevolent purposes. The arguments are not emotional but constitutional. When foreign troops operate from your soil, the ultimate decision-making authority shifts from Jerusalem to the foreign capital whose soldiers are deployed. That reality applies whether the forces wear desert camouflage or blue UN helmets. The uniform doesn’t change the principle.
Now, with Washington pushing a new international ‘Gaza stabilization plan,’ including the possibility of a large U.S. base near Gaza and a multinational force entering the Strip to supervise implementation, the issue is no longer theoretical. This is precisely the scenario that demands clarity before momentum becomes policy.
Foreign forces on sovereign Israeli soil, regardless of their goodwill, are accountable to their own elected officials, media pressures, legal constraints, and casualty aversion. Israeli soldiers are accountable to one thing alone: protecting Israeli lives. When the orders come from two different capitals, there is no guarantee they will align, and especially under fire.
Building a permanent American-staffed base near Gaza creates a second strategic problem, which is that decision-making gravity moves away from Israel. When the war room is not exclusively Israeli, neither are the red lines. If Iran or its proxies test the post-war arrangement, and they will, whose rules of engagement determine the response? Whose political calendar matters more, that of the Knesset or Congress?
Finally, with Washington now speaking openly about a ‘political horizon’ leading toward Palestinian Arab statehood, the placement of foreign forces becomes more than logistical. It becomes a lever. Once troops are embedded regionally, pressure will grow not only on what Israel does, but on what Israel must accept to avoid being portrayed as the obstruction to ‘progress.’ When foreign soldiers are stationed at your doorstep, political coercion no longer requires sanctions; proximity becomes leverage.
The core flaw in the emerging plan is not motive but structure: it turns Gaza into a shared international project but expects Israel to bear 100% of the consequences if it fails. If terrorism resurges, rockets reappear, or foreign troops withdraw after a politically inconvenient casualty, the world will hold a summit; Israelis will run to shelters. The asymmetry is unbearable.
Israel can and should work with the United States on humanitarian corridors, reconstruction frameworks, intelligence coordination, and regional diplomacy, but what it cannot accept is a foreign command footprint that restricts Israel’s freedom of action.
Israel should demand five immovable principles–
– No foreign military bases inside Israel’s sovereign territory;
– No multinational command structure with veto power over Israeli defense;
– No linkage between reconstruction and automatic statehood guarantees;
– Full Israeli freedom to act pre-emptively against terror re-armament;
– A regional coalition that assists, and not supervises Israel.
Washington can be Israel’s greatest ally. But allies should enhance security, not relocate it; strengthen deterrence, not redistribute it; and support sovereignty, not co-manage it.
Israel must say clearly and respectfully: We welcome partnership, but we reject American military forces on our land.