US secretary of state has said the president is working ‘on a very active basis’ with Congress to ‘fix’ the agreement

ed note–before all the usual suspects start their now-chronic screeching campaign that all of this signals that Trump is out to get a war started with Iran in order to please Israel, keep a few important factoids in mind–

He has yet to make any substantive move to remove the JCPOA but instead has thrown it into the lap of Congress. By doing this, he can appear to be aggressive and hawkish when it comes to Iran while substantively, he is doing nothing.

More importantly however, and the thing that IF all the ‘experts’ in ‘duh muuvmnt’ were half as smart as they imagine themselves being would remember, the JCPOA WAS NOT anything favorable to Iran. It was a subversive agreement meant to set in motion the plan of subverting Iran’s sovereignty and of forcing Iran through the process of negotiation into opening up her protected and sacrosanct system to western/zionist subterfuge and sabotage. The entire deal was/is an act of war and a Trojan Horse created with the purpose of chewing away at Iran’s 1979 victory over the West and therefore NO ONE claiming to have an ounce of expertise on this matter should be screeching that Trump’s (perceived) attempt at scrapping the deal is in anyway doing so in order to harm the IRI.

Times of Israel

US President Donald Trump faces two major deadlines this week that could determine whether the United States will quit the Iran nuclear deal.

On Friday, Trump will have to decide whether to sign a number of waivers that would block the renewal of sanctions removed under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the deal is formally known.

If he does not sign those waivers, the sanctions will automatically be reinstated, putting the US in contravention of the deal’s terms and likely spelling the end of the 2015 pact.

Under the accord, the US president has to sign the waivers every 120 days, while the American intelligence services monitor the Islamic Republic’s compliance with the deal, which rolled back crippling sanctions against Tehran in exchange for curbs on its nuclear program.

As a candidate, Trump expressed intense disapproval of the deal, repeatedly promising to tear it up should he be elected and often calling it the “worst deal ever negotiated.” Since ascending to the Oval Office, however, he has stepped back from such dramatic action.

Still, in October, Trump decertified the deal under the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, a congressional mandated measure that requires the president to determine if Iran is in compliance. The administration charged that Iran was not living up to the “spirit” of the agreement and asked Congress to unilaterally impose “trigger points” on the deal that will reimpose nuclear-related sanctions against Tehran should it overstep certain bounds.

Those trigger points, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told reporters at the time, would be aimed primarily at addressing what the administration sees as flaws in the deal, such as the sunset clause, which is set to lift limitations on Iran’s nuclear program when the accord expires in over a decade, and Iran’s ability to continue developing its ballistic missile program.

The move forced Congress to set another review period to determine whether to hit Iran with sanctions that were in place before the accord was implemented, or potentially take other actions.

Trump faces another deadline on Thursday, when he will be required to again certify Iranian compliance with the deal, which he must do every 90 days under the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act.

Tillerson told the Associated Press last week that Trump had yet to make a decision on what he will do this week. He said the administration was talking with lawmakers on “a very active basis” about coming to a resolution.

“The president said he is either going to fix it or cancel it,” he told the AP. “We are in the process of trying to deliver on the promise he made to fix it.”

And yet, Tillerson also intimated there was still a long way to go before reaching a conclusion. “I don’t want to suggest we’re across the finish line on anything yet,” he said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading