Carlson met with President Donald Trump for lunch on Friday, and was pictured in photos with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles
ed note–another eye-opener that every war-weary Gentile with a vested interest in his/her own future survival needs to read, understand, and take deeply to heart.
Firsto, ladies and Gentile-men, although it goes without saying, we’ll say it anyway, which is that this story, appearing as itis on an overtly Jewish and militantly pro-Israel website, means that the contents of the story relate directly to Israel and to Jewish issues. If it is anything that the Jews have made clear over the last 3,000 years of their stay on this planet of the Gentiles, it is that they are concerned with themselves and themselves ONLY in 11 out of 10 cases.
That being said, nota bene the following–
The seek and destroy mission which Judea, Inc has been waging against Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes et al has been as impossible to ignore as a Cat-5 hurricane. There isn’t a Jewish news outlet anywhere on God’s green earth or anywhere within the entire Jewniverse that does not feature ON A DAILY BASIS some manifestation of Judaic snarling, growling, baring of teeth, etc towards the aforementioned 3 ‘anti-Semites’.
And yet, POTUS DJT (who we are all told on a regular basis by all sorts of experts is supposedly Judea’s ‘slave’ and Netanyahu’s ‘servant’) is openly, and some might even say brazenly, having Carlson to the White House, complete with pics for all to see and sample.
So, the obvious question attached to all of this is ‘what’s wrong with this picture?’ How can POTUS DJT be a ‘slave’ to the Jews, as declared on a never-ending daily basis by the chirping class otherwise known as the ‘alternative media’, and yet at the same time, be doing things that the Jews don’t want?
Obviously, the question answers itself. He can’t be. It cannot be two completely opposite things existing at the same time, no more so than winter and summer can co-exist in the same geographical location simultaneously.
So, obviously, POTUS DJT is sending a message, ladies and Gentilemen, to the Torah Terrorists out to start WWIII/Armageddon which is as follows–
‘Tucker Carlson is my friend, his ‘anti-Semitism’ doesn’t bother me one bit, and as President, he has my backing and my support, so be careful that nothing bad happens to him…’
The other important ‘quiet’ part being said out loud is as follows, ladies and Gentile-men–
Methinks and Wethinks that there are more ‘operational’ reasons for the POTUS having Tucker over to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Obviously Carlson has a large following of for-the-most-part MAGA people, and therefore, concerning what is taking place at the moment and what is due to take place in the near future, it is likely that POTUS DJT needed a face-to-face ‘sit down’ with TC to bring him into the picture so that when discussion time arrives on his very popular podcast, he will be giving ‘the right stuff’ to his audience.
So, a short list of possible topics that will feature large and loud in the near future are as follows–
–SUBSTANTIAL US Military involvement in containing Israel…
–SUBSTANTIAL US Military involvement in dealing with ‘south of the border’ issues…
–A quickly-approaching financial/infrastructural/social crisis where POTUS may be forced to do irregular things and go to extraordinary lengths in order to keep the ship of state afloat…
Or…
–His ‘last will and testament’ instructions on what Carlson is to reveal to the American public in the event that the Jews succeed in assassinating POTUS DJT, as they most certainly intend to do.
All of these are of course possibilities of varying percentages, but the one thing about which there is no question is the fact that the Jews were not in the least bit happy to learn of Carlson being invited to the WH twice within just a little over one week. This fact alone should raise some doubts concerning the ‘conventional wisdom’ that gets chirped on a regular basis about Trump being ‘owned by d’Jooz’, but something which, sad to say, will doubtless get no mention whatsoever except on this humble little informational endeavor.
Jewish Insider
Tucker Carlson made a pair of visits to the White House in just 8 days’ time, having lunch with President Donald Trump two Fridays in a row.
Reached by Jewish Insider, the White House did not say what the purpose of Carlson’s two visits were, but confirmed that the far-right commentator and the President had lunch during the second visit. The meeting came one week after Carlson was spotted at a White House gathering for about a dozen oil executives for a discussion about how to best utilize Venezuela’s oil reserves following the U.S. operation that deposed Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.
Carlson was seen in pictures standing against a wall in the East Room during the event on social media later that day.
Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio were scheduled to have lunch with Trump on the day of Carlson’s first visit, according to the President’s public schedule on Friday, Jan. 9, 2026. Carlson also joined the lunch, which took place prior to the event with oil executives, despite his name not being included on the public calendar.
Asked what the agenda was for the first meeting, Carlson replied: ‘[Trump] asked me to lunch on a topic that had nothing to do with Venezuela or oil. It was happenstance that the oil meeting was in progress. I go up regularly to see him and always have the best time.’
Pictures of Carlson in the Oval Office with Trump, Rubio, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and other senior administration officials on Friday began circulating on social media shortly after his visit.
It is not clear who at the White House extended an invitation to Carlson for either of the trips, though the former Fox host has remained friendly with Trump and is close friends with Vance.
Carlson has maintained access to the White House despite regularly pushing antisemitic conspiracy theories on his podcast, while hosting figures like neo-Nazi influencer Nick Fuentes and podcaster Darryl Cooper, a Holocaust denier who has made a name out of claiming Winston Churchill was the main villain of World War II, not Adolf Hitler.
Asked who invited Carlson to the White House, a spokesperson for Vance only confirmed that Carlson was at the White House for a lunch on Friday. The spokesperson did not address JI’s inquiry whether the Vice President had invited Carlson to the White House for either visit.
Come on, Mark. Are you really that naive?
Carlson was summoned to the Orange House in order to receive a final warning that he had better get on board with the Orange Mad Man’s Israel First agenda and his criminal bellicosity towards the rest of the world or else he or one of his family members might wind up joining Charlie Kirk.
ed note– can’t tell if you are being facetious or serious…
And if it is anything I am not, it is ‘naive’.
Now, operating under the notion that you are being serious, please answer the following questions–
1. Why 2 meetings if these threats could have been made at only one? Furthermore, why summon him at all? Why not just send some emissary to Carlson with the message ‘cease and desist?’
And–
2. Why advertise that Carlson was there, knowing that the Jews would make a stink of it?
We wait with baited breath for your answers.
To address your first question – I would speculate that the reason he was summoned to the Orange House, instead of sending a thug to Carlson to deliver the threat was a precautionary measure, to avoid the risk that Carlson would be able to record the issuance of the threat if it was delivered on his home ‘turf’ (studio). Why were two meetings necessary? I do not have answer other than the possibility that Carlson needed to be given additional ‘coaching’ in order for him to make the demanded ‘adjustments’ to his frequently critical opposition to the Orange Mad Man’s increasingly erratic and anti-America First performance during his first year back in power.
As for the second question, I would offer two possibilities. First of all, by summoning Carlson to the Oval Office – this reinforces the ‘Pecking Order’ and strokes the Orange Clown’s narcissistic personality disorder driven ego. A second possibility is that the Orange Clown is aware of the fact that a large, and probably overwhelming, percentage of his ‘support base’ are totally disgusted by his sickening subservience to Satanyahu. We all remember the nauseating photo that was leaked and then went viral where he was pushing a chair under Satanyahu’s fat butt, as if he was his man-servant. So, he is desperate to find ways where he can make it seem as if he isn’t a totally emasculated jew toe licking stooge. Making it widely known that he had two meetings with Tucker Carlson – who the jews have decided to hate – gives the appearance that he is defying his masters. In reality, it’s all just theater.
ed note–First off, thank you spending the time and energy to respond, which usually never happens.
As far as the rest, let us start with the following–
‘Orange House’
‘Orange Mad Man’
‘Orange Clown’
Not once was the word ‘President’ used, nor the word ‘Trump’.
That’s fine, it’s a free world and you are free to have your opinions and your preferred expression of those opinions, but what it shows is that your ENTIRE ‘investment’ in all of this is purely emotional and not rational at all.
That’s fine as well, we all have our own personal emotional ‘investments’ in all of this, I certainly do as anyone can tell from what appears here on this website.
But what it shows is that the more emotionally ‘invested’ someone is in a particular issue, the more that they look for reasons to remain ‘invested’ in that manner, and thus why their ‘default mode’ is to always assume the worst and to never consider other possibilities/explanations.
At the risk of appearing to engage in condescending and patronizing behavior (which I am not) this is what’s known as ‘confirmation bias’, and it can have an extremely debilitating impact on a person’s ability to piece together complex puzzles.
‘Orange Man’ as you put it, did not need to invite Carlson to the ‘Orange House’ in order to deliver his ‘threats’, and we can assume that Carlson not mentioning anything about it in any of his subsequent programs (possibly?) indicates or at least suggests that no ‘threats’ were made.
Now, in the unlikely event that sometime in the near future Carlson does a complete 180, stops producing programs showing the Jews’ ugly side and decides to relegate his subject matter to sanitized subjects where the Jews aren’t involved, perhaps your theories concerning ‘Orange Man’, ‘Orange House’, and ‘Orange Madman’ will carry a little more weight to them.
For now however (at least as far as we here at this humble little informational endeavor are concerned) these ‘theories’ must be seen as the equivalent of fool’s gold that, while certainly creating lots of excitement and attention when first uncovered, later however, after its real essence is discovered and understood, is seen for the very low-value commodity that it is.
“As far as the rest, let us start with the following–
‘Orange House’
‘Orange Mad Man’
‘Orange Clown’
Not once was the word ‘President’ used, nor the word ‘Trump’.”
You seem to have the idea that whoever winds up sitting behind that desk in the Oval Office is some kind of “royalty” and who deserves to be revered and showered with obligatory awe and worshipful respect and reverence. I do not share that attitude. I have a cardinal rule that I follow when it comes to politicians and it is this: Never fall in love with a politician, and this particularly applies to those who you hold your nose and vote for, because the alternative is even more frightening to contemplate. I’m sure you have seen the great quote from the late comedian Robin Williams?
The quote “Politicians are like baby diapers. They both need to be changed frequently and for the same reason.” is often attributed to Robin Williams.
Well, that is my precise attitude and that is why I refuse to extend any sign of respect for any of these dirt bags. With the possible exception of Thomas Massie, and maybe MTG – they are all full of the same thing that is found in a baby’s diapers.
Whether the Oval Office is occupied by the Orange Clown, or by Pedo Joe, or by Obongo, or by Jorge Wmd Boosh or by Slick Wille doing his magic wet cigar tricks with Monica Lewinski or by Poppy Bush arranging suspicious “Call boy midnight tours of the White House”, as reported by the Washington Times on June 29, 1989 – anyone who still clings to the notion that they and everyone else should view the occupant in the Oval Office as a figure to be held in reverence is someone who prefers to live inside a fairy tale world.
But, as they say, “Experience is what you get when you didn’t get what you want.” Today, I am fully red pilled. Which makes me nearly immune from Con man Bull manure.
ed note–once again, you are missing the point.
Not once was it said or even suggested that the POTUS is ‘royalty’ or that he deserves to be ‘revered and showered with obligatory awe and worshipful respect and reverence’, your words.
The only reason that your words involving the color ‘orange’ were brought into the discussion was to underscore the fact that you are operating from a position driven more by emotion than by reason and thus why your statements need to be seen for what they are–the product of ‘confirmation bias’ rather than ‘facts on the ground’. Even your response here confirms this point with your use of terms such as ‘Orange clown’, ‘Pedo Joe’, ‘Obongo’, ‘Jorge WMD Bush’, ‘Slick Willie’, etc.
Fine, as we said before, you are free to to have your emotions, (99% of which I share) and you are equally entitled to your preferred expression of those emotions.
At the same time hwever, understand that for those of us who at least TRY to approach all of this from a position of reason and facts rather than emotions and adjectives, we cannot help but conclude that your opinions on these matters, as understandable from a ‘human’ standpoint as they might be, nevertheless suffer in terms of credibility due to the fact that you are viewing all of this through a highly prejudicial lens that colors everything rather than the clear lens that is needed in coming up with the right answer.
And yes, there is a ‘right’ answer in all of this, irrespective of whatever ‘opinions’ happen to contradict it all.
“Fine, as we said before, you are free to to have your emotions, (99% of which I share) and you are equally entitled to your preferred expression of those emotions.”
My views, which are 100 percent correct, 100 percent accurate and 100 percent based on hard and easily verifiable facts and truth, are NOT based on what you lamely and effeminately try to describe as “emotional”. They are based on an hyper aggressive, unapologetic, pro White, pro White racial advocacy that DOES NOT cower down and tolerate any of that White race emasculating bullshit that emanates from Mark Glenn’s pro-Lebanese mouth or keyboard. Understand this reality, Mark Glenn.
The ‘race card’ that non-whites like yourself have been playing as a racially destructive, White race genocide weapon against White Americans and Whites inside every other historic White European nation is DONE. Whites in ever increasing numbers are now waking up this White Race Replacement and White race genocide agenda.
I’d advise you to disengage yourself from this White genocide agenda. And, if you think there is anything remotely ’emotional’ ‘feminine’ about the racial survival instincts of racially healthy White European non-emasculated men, then I have a bridge to sell you for a very reasonable price.
Ed note– 100% correct?
Nobody is ever 100% correct and only an unhinged and unstable mental case believes he/she is.
Not ’emotional’?
You’ve got to be kidding. The only thing missing from this latest one is that you didn’t use all caps.
Non-white?
I’m as ‘white’ as white gets, even if I don’t have blond hair and blue eyes. The fact that I tan in the sun better than pasty-faced types like you should not be a cause for jealosy on your part.
Played the ‘race card’?
What planet are you living on, because it sure isn’t Earth. I have NEVER played the ‘race card’ and the fact that you would toss such an unhinged statement into this shows just how mentally unstable and detached from reality you are.
‘WHITE GENOCIDE AGENDA?
You people are just plain nuts. You think and sound just like the Jews–unhinged, detached from reality, but you’re not as smart as they are, unfortunately. It’s no wonder they mop up the floor with you on a regular basis in the media because you are just too damned stupid for your own good and your comments show this unequivocally.
And since we’re ‘giving advice’ here, a little advice for you–
If you really are into saving the ‘white race’, quit doing the Jews’ dirty work for them by attacking Trump, and if you can’t see that he and (most of) the rest of the MAGA team are the answer to your ‘white race’ prayers, as imperfect as that answer is, then do the world a favor, close up your laptop and disengage from political commentary, because every time you open your mouth as you just did, you give the Jews all the ammo they need in making whites (at least whites like you) look like double-digit IQ types.
Oh, and lastly, if you find the commentary here so ‘objectionable’ to your ‘white race’ sensibilities, as well as the PHOENECIAN DNA that is driving all the analysis/commentary here, why do you spend so much time on this site? Don’t you have the mental muscle to do your own thing with a website/blog of your own?
Oh, and one more thing–if it weren’t for the fact that my ‘cousins’ in the Middle East have been engaging with the Jews like men, including fighting on the battlefield with real weapons instead of fat-assing themselves in front of a computer as you do, we can all imagine where things would be today, so plug that into your understanding about who the real men are and who the real men AREN’T, ‘white boy’.
Been following this comment thread since it started and am surprised that it ended the way it did.
But then again maybe not.
Have been in a million debates with types like ‘tucker’ and have seen how irrational they are when they start to lose the argument.
If I didn’t know better, I’d say he was one of those bots working from unit 8200 out of Israel, but maybe I’m just letting my imagination get the better.
TUT, in the event you missed the latest podcast from Tucker Carlson–
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOs0Kpj0g1w&pp=2AaeCQ%3D%3D
He gets into it pretty hot and heavy with the guy from YoungTurks about Israel, so obviously, Trump made no threats, as your previous commentor theorized might be the case.
In fact, if someone were to operate from simple cause and effect, one might even speculate that in the meeting between Trump and Carlson that the former may have even told the latter to ‘turn up the heat’, as this latest podcast seems to have demonstrated. No one can say for sure, because none of us were there, but it seems pretty obvious from TC’s latest program that obviously no threats to life or limb were made to him by the most powerful man in the world
How on earth did a discussion about the possible reasons for Tucker Carlson visiting the White House somehow morph into charges that this website is engaged in ‘white genocide’?
Is this a serious comment or was it a prank?
Ed note–Not a prank, but not a surprise either…
As the WN crowd has demonstrated on occasions too numerous to count, they are (given whatever discussion happens to be taking place at whatever moment) highly irrational malcontents who look for any opportunity to claim victim status in the exact same way that Jews constantly scream about ‘anti-Semitism’. To these types, just DISAGREEING with them (and even on a matter completely unrelated to the issue of ‘white nationalism’) makes the one who disagrees with them a ‘white hater’ engaged in ‘white genocide’ in much the same way that the Jews accuse everyone who disagrees with them of being a ‘Jew hater’ that wants to cause another ‘Holocaust’.
And were this an isolated case, we would not be so quick to generalize the issue, but the fact is that this is not isolated at all. We have personally been involved in hundreds of similar engagements over the years, all of them following the same pattern as what took place above.
Have also found myself on the receiving end of the ‘white genocide’ accusation in debates with white nationalists on matters COMPLETELY unrelated to the wn issue. They seem to have taken a page from the Jews’ playbook on how to shut down criticism of their weak arguments. I personally saw nothing wrong with the mood of the debate on this post up until the charge of ‘white hatred’ got tossed in and even now I am having trouble isolating how ‘white hatred’ could be have played a part in it when clearly there wasn’t any.
Sounds like maybe ‘Tucker’ is just a tad too sensitive to having his ideas critiqued and even in a friendly way.