Even a superficial statistical look at the last 100 or so articles published in TUT, as well as a cursory text analysis, would reveal an obsessive, enthralled preoccupation with Trump. No other topic gets as much attention. NONE.

The views of some of the TUT contributors and commenters have changed over time, from, “he has the Kosher seal, the mark of the beast, a clown” to  seeing him as our true hope, a sophisticated, urban gentleman of fine tastes (I am not making this up) and a very clever billiards player (metaphorically) who knows just how to make his ricochet hits, an heir to the Republican (Goy) forefathers and someone with deep connections to a secret patriotic cell in the intelligence community, kind of like the Oath Keepers.

My lack of trust in him has not changed, which does not mean I do not respect the views and above all hopes of those who look to him for salvation. Try as I would, however, I cannot interpret every one of his many Islamophobic rants or his lies about 9/11 as yet another of his clever ploys to get people to delve into the internet and discover the truth by themselves. I cannot make myself believe that he has the support of some secret anti-Israel/anti-JP group in the intelligence community. In fact I don’t want to believe that because if Trump is all they can think of to hang their plans on they cannot be very good planners. And I would like to think there is such a group and that they make some serious plans.

Be that as it may, the sheer volume  and focus of Trumpologia and the beat by beat reports of the  still twitching, decrepit nag the Republican party (declared dead by the very tribe that decimated it) is today that is accumulating on TUT makes me wonder if TUT is not ignoring at its peril what goes on on the “Left.”

The MSM has been giving an unprecedented coverage to Israel misdeeds, exposing its American sayanim, and in trenchant terms at that. None of the former “balanced view” photoshopping of the nastiness and peril of the “Jewish state”:

“Prominent American professor proposes that Israel “flatten Beirut” — a 1 million-person city it previously decimated Amitai Etzioni, who teaches at renowned universities, says Israel may have no choice but to destroy Lebanon — again.

The rubble of Beirut’s southern suburbs in August 2006, after Israel’s war in Lebanon, which destroyed tens of thousands of homes.

(This article was updated with a statement from Amitai Etzioini.)

A prominent American scholar who teaches international relations at George Washington University has publicly proposed that Israel “flatten Beirut” — a city with around 1 million people — in order to destroy the missiles of Lebanon-based militant group Hezbollah.

Professor Amitai Etzioni — who has taught at a variety of prestigious U.S. universities, including Columbia, Harvard and Berkeley, and who served as a senior advisor in President Jimmy Carter’s administration — made this proposal in an op-ed in Haaretz, the leading English-language Israeli newspaper, known as “The New York Times of Israel.” Haaretz represents the liberal wing of Israel’s increasingly far-right politics.”
From the Salon.

Ha’aretz is widely believed to be the Mossad’s voice and Salon is a Jewish “left” propaganda organ. The Jewish Left (JL) has been engaged in a power struggle against the Jewish Right (JR)– Netanyahu’s cohorts (Likkud+) — for some time. Hard as it may be for some Americans to believe, American politics are at this point nothing more than a large stage on which Jewish Power plays its squabbles. There is no such thing as some personal antipathy between Netanyahu and Obama, or not one that counts for anything: they are but role players reciting the scripts of their respective string pullers.

Neither the JL nor the Jewish Right JR side of Jewish Power has any use for Trump beyond the primary circus, so yes, we can say that “Jews” (in general) dislike Trump. But the main event remains the final match between the JL — the Soros party —  and the JR — the Adelson et al. Is the JL gaining? It might be. Who would their pick be? It is worth pondering on these questions a little in between Trump watching news. 

 

19 thoughts on “Watch Your Left! It's Gaining on You”
  1. TO FLATTEN THE JEWISH PROBLEM, FLATTEN JUDAISM.
    TO FLATTEN JUDAISM, FLATTEN THE TORAH AND MOSES AND ABRAHAM.
    This is the Jewish problem rearing its ugly head again. It will keep raising its ugly head again and again, unless we flatten the Jewish problem.
    You are one of the few who quotes Deuteronomy, which is a part of the Torah, which is a part of the Old Testament, which vile evil despicable fictional books are the source of Jewish mental illness.
    So to treat the Jewish mental illness, you have to flatten Judaism and you do that by flattening the Torah.
    How?
    Educate them that Moses never existed, and that Torah is a piece of vile fiction, by mentally deranged criminals and bandits (habiru means bandits in Akkadian).
    Here is the proof:
    http://mosesneverexisted.zohosites.com/
    Remind them that according to Jewish author Hitches, the OT was written by “human animals.”
    Judaists who promote war or the alien invasion are MENTALLY ILL. They are criminally insane as they become mentally ill after being brainwashed by the insane rantings of the criminally insane habiru bandits, which insane rantings were transcribed as the Torah.
    To civilize these barbarians, email (or mail) them links to the websites such as above.

  2. Be aware of the FALSE LEFT doing battle with the FALSE RIGHT in the Hegelian Dialectic. BOTH are 2 sides if the same coin. BOTH serve the same AGENDA.
    Hegelian Dialectic – Weapons of the Elite
    http://lisaleaks.com/2013/05/28/hegelian-dialectic-weapon-of-the-elite/
    Remember the stand-off in Oregon? Well, it was 2 private entities squabbling over OUR land!!
    WATER / LAND THEFT
    http://www.stopthecrime.net/waterlandtheft.html
    https://twitter.com/Pepperpear/media
    Behind every fortune lies a great crime. Honore de Balzac
    5 Billionaires OWN the USA Rothschilds, Rockefellers, DuPonts, Harrimans, & Warburgs
    The United States Isn’t a Country
    —It’s a Corporation !
    http://www.abodia.com/2/United-States-is-a-corporation.htm#possession_of_the_Queen_of_England

  3. The facts remain that Trump is hated by the system through and through .
    I know very much about the Matrix,and Jewish formula ….what he is saying is very out of the norms .
    There is no reward for it ,and call one gets is blistering attack .
    Whatever anyone “mistrusts” about him is 360 degrees° separate from the others ….everyone a stooge of the Jews.
    If he goes down in the primaries than we goooooo right back to the same left/right promises of austerity, war, globalism, and petty bourgeoisie debate ….and yes he is a rather urban MSN compared to the rest, who lived a real life, not an artificial one of hypocrisy, and limited horizons of political office place taking.
    ” Dint like Trump ?” ..tell me anyone with such shocking, and satisfying alternatives with any chance at all please ?

  4. 1. I am not sure what you are trying to say by this, Dante:
    “Whatever anyone ” mistrusts ” about him is 360 degrees° seperate from the others ….everyone a stooge of the Jews.”
    2. There is no one at all that could be called a “satisfying alternative with any chance at all,” and that includes Trump. There is no chance at all that can come from elections, including presidential elections, especially presidential elections. The whole putrid pie is infected: the executive, the legislative and the judiciary.
    3. My point was not to once again challenge the arguments for hope vested in Trump but only to point out that there might be other boils growing on the left side of the body of the very sick republic that we might be missing by this all-absorbing focus on Trump.
    4. Suppose Trump is neither elected nor killed (as we keep predicting here on TUT). Suppose he just goes back to his “deals,” well situated in his very Jewish world, with his very Jewish family, and suppose that Sanders becomes the next US President. He might be a “satisfying alternative” to the Soros gang. And then we don’t “goooo right back to the same left/right promise of austerity, war, globalism,” etc simply because WE NEVER LEFT IT, NOT FOR A MOMENT. We are firmly in that clutch and no White House occupant can get us out.

  5. @#2,
    Not who is going to win #2.
    Who do you think is the best choice from the existing candidates
    for the sake of the West and the rest of the world.
    In all of your arguments, we have only heard your reasons why
    Sanders will win.
    Who, #2, who do you think should win for the betterment of America
    and the world?
    Since you seem to believe you have it ALL figured out, who should
    win?
    Sanders, Clinton? Rubio or Cruz?
    That Russian Guy’s compliments of your cerebral acumen left you
    with a certain amount of pride and discontent.
    His post are no longer here.
    Where did he go?
    I thought him more clever than you but wrong in the same vain.
    Maybe you and he could unite and begin a unified site.
    You know, “Putin is a Jewish shill and Sanders is his Patsy”, site.
    Maybe you will rebut.
    Whatever follows that should be interesting.
    All your other post seem to be self aggrandizement.
    Maybe I am just projecting.
    But how could that be since I am such a cunt?
    Maybe I am just bored with reading your narcissistic post.
    Fear not at all. I am in no sense a Doctor.
    This is only my Blue Collar, lower class, unexceptional upbringing
    that makes me question your intentions and integrity and insight.
    Let me say this first Ariadna, you are more intelligent than me.

  6. @Todd:
    1. I don’t think ANY of the existing candidates SHOULD win for the best of the country and the world. The only public figure/politician with enough integrity to demand that the Federal Reserve be dismantled is not running and if he were he would not win. Sanders says he is against wars but he demands we put troops on the Russian border; he claims to be all for the American working people but the “indissoluble bond” with our greatest ally is sacred to him: the call of his tribe. Trump says he is against wars, calls the war on Iraq a mistake, says he would do great “deals’ with Russia but promises a grand expansion of the military– against what ‘enemy”?! And of course he is Israel’s best friend. The elections are a rigged game. No real change can come through that well-guarded filter. That is my view. Pessimistic? Maybe? Skeptical? Cynical? Maybe. It is what it is.
    2. I am not saying that I think Sanders WILL win. I am only afraid he might, because he would be a far more dangerous circumcised Trojan horse than the gay, menorah-whipped Hispanic boy. Sanders is a mealy-mouthed zionist in populist garb who cam fool the middle class he claims to represent, whereas Rubio would be more generally distrusted, even hated, and possibly even arouse a spark of revolt in the slumbering masses.
    3. If you think that the Russian guy you mention — or you, for that matter — can flatter me pink by saying I am intelligent you greatly underestimate my ego, Todd. Suppose I am the “narcissist” you claim I am: don’t you think I would take my high intelligence as a given? Be logical and consistent: Do you think I would take that so-called flattery gratefully as a lagniappe for buying what you’re saying? No, Todd, I would demand a lot more: more sophisticated flattery… 🙂 I found it cute that you said: “I thought him more clever than you but wrong in the same vain.” There are no typos, some say, only Freudian slips. You had “vain” on your mind but just forgot to mention my vanity, right?
    3. But enough about me and let us turn to more of my opinions… 🙂
    There are a few fundamentals all (I hope) of us here on TUT agree on:
    — The root of evil of the modern world is Jewish Power (JP), which controls it. I don’t say “Christian” world because the tentacles of JP extend to parts of several Muslim nations, and I don’t say “Western” for the same reason.
    — The judaic mentality (rooted in Judaism, whether served straight up as Judaism or on the rocks of the various cocktails all the way to “secular,”zionism,” “communism” and any other “isms” marketed by JP) is the infrastructure on which JP is built and also its engine.
    — The Goy world enslaved by JP cannot begin to liberate itself without first understanding what has enslaved it, what makes JP tick and where its Achille’s heel is (financial power), and without turning away from the brain-washing of the MSM and beginning to search for truth. That is where TUT comes in and several (not many) alternative media venues come in.
    — Any attempt to “fix” a nation that does not address #1 and #2 is either a bandaid over a deep, infected wound or a deceit.
    There are a few corrolaries — not fundamentals– not all of us agree on. They are more in the nature of tactical rather than strategic, let alone axiomatic, views. Mine are that:
    — No single leader, no matter how visionary and heroic, can be the Savior of any nation unless he has his people steadfastly and cohesively behind him, like Putin. America is not much of a nation at this point: it is sundry collection of sheep flocks braying against each other and imaginary wolves even while being devoured by their Wolf’s “next door.” It has no national consciousness, only fragmentary identities (feminists, gays, blacks/whites, Christian zionists/Tongue speakers, etc) and no knowledge of their own history. The Europeans are being taught that they are not nations either because “nations” don’t exist (except in Israel) and that Europe–as the Pope informed them — is an infertile old hag whose only salvation are the fertile refugees. If Jesus came to America today they would not crucify Him–it’s not the American way. They would first revile him for “hate speech” and then they would have Him killed. We would be later told that His killer shouted “Allahu Akbar.”
    That is my dim view of America.
    Is it reasonable to hope that Putin not only wins in the end but also awakens and inspires Western Christianity? Hope needn’t be rational. That is my hope.
    Is it reasonable to hope that the Muslim nations will finally see the sectarian strife as the creation of JP and unite against it? That the sunnies will hear Nasrallah call and respond to it? That Iran will not succumb to the various insidious maneuvers to undermine it from within sure to be begin once relations with the West are “normalized”? Hope needn’t be all rational. This is my hope.

  7. I am so happy Trump is running for president. With his incredible courage, facing the whole country and with his honesty, without any support whatsoever except from his family (disregarding his son in law I suspect) he has shown what a bunch of liars and murderers the American gov’t is made up of. He has done a great service when he said of G W Bush and the attack on Iraq – “they lied”. He has single handedly turned around the thinking on illegal immigration and put forth ideas on how to turn around the US from its downward spiral. He is the only candidate that has spoken out against the destruction of Europe’s peoples and harshly criticized Merkel. He might not only save the US, but also Europe. But if he doesn’t, at least he is saying things that help. For decades I’ve heard American presidents express constant concern for Jews and Israel while the American media denigrates Europeans (NAZIS, collaborators, Christians, et al) and all whites (turning away Jews in boats fleeing the hatred world Jewry was provoking thru boycotts, assassinations and calls for war on Germany). Trump is the first president since Kennedy expressing real concern for Europeans by speaking out against their destruction. I believe this is because of his Scottish mother and German grandfather. He constantly mentions his German friends that are leaving Germany. Trump is the only person that speaks his mind, regardless of what others think. Under some of the other Republican candidates, the risk of war with Russia is significant. And this would be done for Europeans “freedom” of course. No it wouldn’t. It is so the US could retain its hegemony over Europe and the Jews can have Putin and Russia weakened, and if Europe suffers another war that doesn’t bother them in the least. .
    Trump’s policies towards Jews, Arabs and Iran is the question, but he has made comments that give hope there too. His saying he would be “neutral” in dealing with Israel and the Palestinians, that he does not necessarily support Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, that he doesn’t want Jews money and that he wants to bring back the expression “Merry Christmas” are all things Jews don’t like and he is definitely aware of this. My concern is his constant verbal attacks on Iran, which I view as a victim of the US and the Jews that rule over the US. But there too, he might be better than the others. He bemoans the money the US gave to Iran, but he has not said he would tear up the agreement, while some of the other candidates would. I doubt he is getting any support from the CIA or group that wants to change things. It’s his brashness and charisma that has put him where he is.
    Here is the debate again. Watch it and see how he has exposed the whole rotten and corrupt American system. All the people in the audience are donors to the other candidates. These are the people booing him. He tells his audience this in every speech he makes. He is going to win.
    http://www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2016/02/full-video-cbs-republican-debate-from-south-carolina/

  8. For the record, as I have stated on the program several times as of late, I am not ‘for’ Trump. I think he represents everything that is wrong with America and the West. At the same time however, I do watch with fascination the gangwar that is taking place, if for no other reason than the fact that MAJOR events–along the lines of 9/11 or worse–will follow as a result of all of this and which will filter down to the personal level for all of us. I have not forgotten about the rest of the battlefield where other equally-important events are taking place and I do my best to give them as much coverage as I can in the daily updates.
    Nevertheless, I do think that Ariadna’s comments are well-taken–Trump is not a ‘moral’ man. His decisions–whether it is in the business world or whether it will be in the political world if he is elected–are not guided by what is morally right, but rather, what makes sense to him. If it ‘made sense’ to bomb a nation such as Iran and murder millions of people, Trump would do it, just as Bush did with Iraq. If it ‘made sense’ to continue with arming Israel to the hilt and to continue providing her with money and political support, Trump would do it. And remember as well one of the ideas we have advanced here vis a vis the entire Trump phenomenon–He is only the face of something much bigger, and the people behind him are/can be just as ruthless as the people that many here are hoping Trump’s presidency will save us from.

  9. “I think he represents everything that is wrong with America and the West.” That is an impossibility since he is completely opposed to everything the west has been doing, beginning after WW II. Trump is a nationalist. If anything, he represents everything that is wrong with the whole world, except the west. Besides being a nationalist, I believe he identifies with his people, the countries and cultures of his parents and grandparents. Again, this is not what is “wrong” with the west. It is what is “wrong” with the rest of the world. Only one thing. It’s not wrong.
    Morality is established or changed by those with the power to change it in their favor. Homosexuality, pornography, sex with a 16 or 17 year old, miniskirts and many other things were considered immoral at one time.
    I would avoid doing business with Trump. What he considers being a “tough negotiator”, I would probably consider less than fair. And there are many other businessmen like him. In regards to starting a war, I think he is the least likely of all the candidates to start a war. He is the “[peace” candidate out of the whole bunch.

  10. Peter, I like your enthusiasm but not its object. There are quite a few inaccuracies in your list of Trump “firsts” but I value your friendship more than the exercise of a futile dialog to expand upon this. Let us just agree to disagree. We will always have… South America. 🙂

  11. Next Year in Jerusalem, Peter! Insh’allah! 🙂
    Incidentally, have you by any chance read Gilad’s ‘A Guide to the Perplexed?’ It is riotously funny but very raunchy.
    Here’s the blurb on the back cover that should give you an idea about it:
    “The year is 2052, and the state of Israel has been defunct for forty years, the majority of its citizens having become refugees overseas. In order to provide Israel with a decent burial, an Institute for the Documentation of Zion is established, and among its archives is the autobiography of Gunther Wünker. Born in Israel, Gunther becomes fiercely anti-Zionist through the experience of national service. he loves European, especially German, women and soon leaves Israel to find fame, fortune and fornication in Germany.”

  12. Oy, I looked at my copy when I copied the blurb for you, Peter. It has a nice dedication on the flyleaf: With love and admiration… Ah, the snows of yesteryear before my uppity ways and sharp tongue got him all bekakt… 🙂

  13. @ariadna,
    I agree with everything you said in your 2nd post, as well with what MG said.
    Just wanted to know where you stood. I apologize for the provocation.
    Thank you for the link. I voted for Ron Paul because he was the only one that
    represented and defended the constitution and was not bought by corporate
    puppeteers.
    Trump is the best of all bad choices.
    That is all I am suggesting.
    Or, we can do as Gerald Celente and Paul Craig Roberts suggest and not vote
    at all.
    Trump is definitely NOT any sort of salvation for America nor the world.
    I just think he could buy us more time compared to the rest of the guard dogs
    running in this “race”.
    My “compliment” to you at the end of my post was what I believe to be a fact.
    My compliment to you was sincere. I just wanted to know what side of the fence
    your feet stood.
    Again, your 2nd post explained it perfectly to me and I agree with you.
    Forgive me for the challenge I gave to you. And without any compliment to
    myself, I thought it was the best of all your writing since you have been here.
    Thank you for your good work at TUT.

  14. Thanks, Todd. No apology needed.
    Of course you complimented yourself: you’re saying only you can get the best out of me … 🙂
    Good night. Tomorrow is another day to expose Judaism.

  15. I complimented you only.
    I do not have the ability or rights to compliment myself.
    I do not even have the heart that needs this.
    Exposure of Judaism concerns me the most.
    Tomorrow we will expose more of THEIR
    treachery.
    This is my only concern.

  16. Ariadna,
    My heart never feels any need to compliment myself. In this you are incorrect. I am a piss like any other. I do not seek the best from you either.
    That is your own choice. I just wanted to see where your feet are standing clearly for myself.
    This was my only business with you today. The rest of it is your own concern,
    Tomorrow, we will fight and expose our Judaic enemy together.
    At least this is my hope.
    I am a good baseball player. That is the only compliment I will ever give myself.
    Even still, that ability was given to me from God.
    I have never and do not ever have any right to “compliment myself”
    regardless of any ability I might have been born with.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading