[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC-Cqkq6zWc&w=420&h=315]

The ugly fruit of the poisoned tree plastered with slogans like “Embrace Diversity,” “White Guilt,” “Anti-racism,” etc is now ripe: divisiveness and hate that blinds and prevents national unity.

Funded by Soros, Black Lives Matter (BLM) is another Jewish deception: black lives matter to them as much as any Goy lives, i.e., not at all, but BLM is useful to fan the flames of hate among Goyim.

Black BLM activists advocating white genocide at a “debate” at a Georgia university.

5 thoughts on “BLM — A Soros-Sponsored Hate-Hatching Pit”
  1. The bull-horned clown fish in the P-Diddy sweatshirt appears to have
    1/2 “white” gene pool compared to his “;cousin” to his left.
    White privileges?
    Where does the line start? I would be happy to stand in it and receive
    my accidental reward.
    I have no advantage to speak of for being “white”.
    What I do have is from effort, learning, concentration on not making any
    huge mistakes, and some timely grace from God above.
    What I do temporarily possess, has nothing to do with the “white privileges”.
    I have never received work I sought because I am “white”.
    i never assumed that should be an advantage for me.
    In California, it is a disadvantage from what I’ve experienced.
    I wonder if I would be able to get this 1/2 white bull-horned clown fish to
    understand this.
    Does he hate his mother’s, or his father’s accidental genetic heritage?
    Odds are, white goofy single mother, wayward black father.
    I’m just stating the overwhelming odds here.
    It could be the other way ’round.
    Even us stinking Irish. We have our many faults. Many, many faults.
    We drink and fight too much, maybe.
    But I remember a story my Nana told me long ago.
    She said the Kathy (my mother) and Shirley (her best friend) brought
    a “black boy” to their house (circa 1955).
    Nana told me that, “I think they brought him over just to shock me. I did
    not care about his color. I thought he was a very nice boy”.
    As I check my outstanding debts, I do not see that I owe any black or
    Jew or whatever any of you call yourselves now anything more than common courtesy.

  2. This is the benefit of diversity. It basically benefits the Jews. The Jews played the lead role in starting WW II in Europe, a war between Europe’s different peoples. With their leading role in the media and their access to politicians (allowing them to bribe people like Churchill) Jews drove Europe to war. They fomented the hatred in the media and paid the people in power that started WW II.
    They act similarly in the USA. The Jewish media has been fomenting hatred between blacks and whites for at least the last few years by propagandizing every altercation between a black and a white cop, presenting thugs like Michael Brown of Ferguson as saints and every white cop as evil. They believe this benefits them. They will always be the outsider because they don’t want to integrate, not because Europeans haven’t tried to integrate them and if blacks, whites and others did live together peacefully Jews would still want to be the outsider and as long as they are the outsider they will be in danger so by promoting ethnic hatred between others they stay above the fray. They don’t want Trump’s blacks and whites becoming mutual friends and supporters.
    The debt that whites owe blacks in the USA was incurred mostly until the year 1865 when slavery was abolished. But it’s questionable how much that debt amounts to and it in fact may be very little. Slavery held blacks back in the British and Spanish colonies and then the USA once it became an independent nation, but how did the standard of living for a slave in the USA compare to the standard of living to an African at that time? And how did the standard of living of a free black compare to an African at that time? The free American black probably had a much higher standard of living than the average African. And how does the standard of living of the average Black American compare to the average African since 1865? It has probably been much, much higher.
    The USA was a country founded and developed by Europeans and it became a world power with a high standard of living because of that. No non-European made a contribution to the degree that it would negate the statement that the USA owes its success to Europeans. Africa (excluding the north African Arabic countries) has been the most backwards part of earth for centuries and I’m not aware of any evidence that it has not always been the most backwards part of the world, so at least since 1865 blacks have benefitted from living in the USA. If I’m wrong about that and Africans had a higher standard of living than black Americans I would like to see the evidence. Since Rhodesia became Zimbabwe and abandoned white rule and since South Africa abandoned white rule about 20 years ago there has been a steady decline in those countries. Violence has increased enormously and the once beautiful cities in those countries have descended into third world hell holes at the same rate that American cities that are predominantly black have done the same in the USA.
    There is no such thing “white privilege”. The laws set up give blacks an advantage when applying for government jobs or applying to college and most companies have programs committing them to diversity but blacks have not succeeded there either, so Indians, Asians and others get those spots but many of those people would get those jobs anyway because they are high achievers. The failure of the average black American to do better rests with him or her as the success of blacks like Obama and others rests with them.
    And at the same time Jews, who are inherently racist against others with their ethnic nepotism have completely taken over the USA, pushing whites out of all areas of power or roads to power so it is the whites that are discriminated against in their own country, but no one says a word about this except for “anti-semites” like us that point it out on internet blogs..

  3. Controversy brewing in Montevideo, Uruguay, over the project (long approved) to install a sculpture of Virgin Mary on the promenade (“Rambla”). “Separation between church and state” is the banner and they said that putting a religious symbol there is tantamount to making the whole public space a church! Unacceptable.
    The same protestors — who have managed to kill the project — were thrilled pink with the idea of putting a symbol of a native deity on the beach, that sculpture being paid for by the municipality unlike the Virgin Mary sculpture. There is also a huge Budha — (as an aside, the funny thing is that everybody makes jokes about the position of the head and the angle of the gaze that makes Buddha seem to be contemplating his sexual organ). Needless to say the Holocaust Museum on the Rambla is nothing but the glorification of the newest Jewish religion.
    So “Diversity” may and in fact must include all religions EXCEPT CHRISTIANITY. Focused hate. In a country in which the overwhelming majority are Catholics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from The Ugly Truth

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading