Under Netanyahu’s watch, warning from the leader of the United Arab Emirates never reached the chiefs of Israel’s security establishment
ed note–Several important ‘protocols’ that all persons of the Gentile persuasion with a vested interest in their own future survival need to consider carefully.
Firsto, ladies and Gentile-men, a lil’ bit of ‘intelligence’ lingo–
‘A limited hangout is a public relations and intelligence tactic where an organization or government, after a cover-up fails, admits to a portion of a damaging truth while keeping the most critical and incriminating details hidden… By releasing select, controlled facts to make the organization appear honest and transparent, it results in a distracted public via sensational or seemingly definitive pieces of news so that the general public stops asking deeper questions… In the end, it protects the core operation itself, high-ranking officials who may have been involved, or damaging secrets from full exposure…’
Now, does this mean that Netanyahu was not warned by various ‘in the know’ individuals about the impending Oct. 7th attacks?
No, not at all. He knew, but it was much deeper than that, a fact which the propagators of the limited hangout below are seeking to shield from public disclosure (and attending public discussion) by throwing everyone a ‘bone’ of information to chew on that will keep them distracted and quiet for a while.
Netanyahu, in addition to being a mass murderer, is a spymaster as well. Bigger than Oct. 7th (and infinitely more complicated from a logistics standpoint) was 9/11, which he personally oversaw.
This being the case, doubtless that Netanyahu’s spies are everywhere, including within Haaretz and the NYT from whence all of this ‘foreknowledge’ discussion is emanating as of late, and therefore, if this information were truly as damaging to him (particularly at election time) as some are led to believe, he would have sent his goons to the writers of these news pieces for a little ‘chat’ that would have resulted in the stories being ‘deep-sixed’, another piece of ‘intelligence’ lingo.
So the fact that these facts are coming out now, and as damaging as they APPEAR to be, the fact is that this information being permitted to be released at this time means that it serves in the above-described capacity as a ‘limited hangout’ operation.
And what is this more damaging and dangerous piece of information that Netanyahu, Inc is seeking to censor by allowing ‘foreknowledge’ stories of these types to be published?
The fact that he personally oversaw the Oct. 7th attacks every bit as much as he oversaw the 9/11 attacks, and that just as much as Israeli spies and operatives were on the ground in NY/NJ on the morning of 9/11 to ‘document the event’ and make sure that everything went off as planned, likewise, Netanyahu had his ‘peeps’ on the ground in Gaza prior to and on the morning of Oct. 7th to make sure that everything went ‘by the numbers’ in order to get the same WWIII/Armageddon started which Torah Judah-ism commands.
Now, as much as all of this may appear to be an exercise in stating the obvious, the fact of the matter, the UGLY TRUTH of the matter, is that it really isn’t…
A few weeks from now will be the 3rd anniversary of the infamous ‘Oct 7th attacks’ that have, in case the reader was not aware, kicked off the same WWIII/Armageddon which Torah Judah-ism commands and which Netanyahu believes he has been ordained, anointed, and ‘chosen’ to oversee in ushering in the Jews’ ‘Maschaic’, or messiah.
And in that 3 year time period, how much discussion took place that SUGGESTED that Netanyahu had ‘foreknowledge’ of the impending attacks?
A few…
And how much discussion took place that Oct. 7th was an Israeli op aimed at getting WWIII/Armageddon started?
Save for a tiny handful of websites, including the humble little informational endeavor right here, none.
Now, all can imagine the political effect that would have presented itself if immediately, or sometime shortly after the events of Oct. 7th, instead of there being a few murmurs of–
‘ISRAEL KNEW…’
Instead, there was a LOT of–
‘ISRAEL DID IT…’
–perhaps then, maybe, if THAT were the discussion taking place 3 years ago, instead of the limited hangouts coming out now on cue, we, the Gentiles of the world, would not be sitting at the VERY PRECIPICE of our own destruction as commanded by Torah Judah-ism and the diabolically-deranged followers of this anti-God, anti-human creed.
As we like to counsel the readers of this website, of the many, MANY uncomplimentary adjectives that can be attached to ‘them’, the ‘Children of Israel’ as they love to refer to themselves, the one adjective that CANNOT be applied is that they are stupid, because they most certainly ARE NOT.
New York Times
As Israelis prepare to vote next month, the question of who bears responsibility for failing to prevent the Hamas-led attack of Oct. 7, 2023 has become a dominant issue in one of Israel’s most consequential campaigns in history.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, seeking an unprecedented seventh term, has placed the blame on national security officials, while his critics have said he must personally answer for the failures. When Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported earlier this month that Sheikh Mohammed Bin Zayed, President of the United Arab Emirates, had given Mr. Netanyahu a secret warning that Hamas was planning a major attack, the question took on even greater urgency.
Mr. Netanyahu has denied the report.
But an unnamed source who claims to have spoken with Sheikh Mohammed and another who said they had been briefed by someone on the call between the two leaders told The New York Times that the Emirati leader had clearly reported to Mr. Netanyahu that Hamas was planning a major attack.
The warning from the Emirati leader, however, never reached the leaders of Israel’s security establishment, according to five former senior Israeli officials. Several days after receiving the warning from the UAE President, Netanyahu gathered his security chiefs on Oct. 1, 2023 for a meeting about the situation in the Gaza Strip, and never mentioned the warning, according to minutes of the meeting reviewed by The Times.
Instead, he told them that the goal should be to maintain calm in Gaza, and he pushed back when some security officials said that Israel should consider military strikes against senior Hamas leaders in Gaza who were overseeing attacks against Israelis in the West Bank, the minutes show.