Such Lovely Folk: “Happy Holidays Everyone”

Take a look Europe. Here is what your Jews think of you all !
Are you cheering your Jewish masters now …Germany ?

Breaking news!
3 bombs in Brussels – 34 dead – 230 injured! (or as they say in Bagdad a “another quiet day”)
US drops 36,378 bombs on Syria (ISIS says only 36,375 to go then)
Absolute devastation in Brussels Airport (As compared to Homs, Aleppo, Sirte, Bagdad, and Cizre)

Before ‘shit (or thing/etc) hit the fan,’ as the saying, all goyim must wake up from comatose states; especially, those who are intimately indulging the ‘bread and circus’ way of life. Once however, ‘whatever hit the fan’ and spread to all the corners of the globe, these ‘cattle-like-people’ definitely vanish instantly, immediate death, or in some areas disappear slowly, agonizing death due to contamination and/or starvation. They better smell the coffee sooner than later, certainly there won’t be any ‘bread & circus,’ left afterward.

It is true about scarcity of ‘bread,’ it is already existed with us as some people said, “After the economical collapse of year 2008, we see and find more the circus (thousand of Entertainment TV Channels) and less of the bread (Essential Food Stuffs).”

Happy Holidays, indeed!

As part of a large two volume project on the fictional nature of the biblical narrative, I have done a lot of research on the Book of Esther (the only book of the Hebrew Bible that does not mention Yahweh Elohim), and I will try to sum up that research here as concisely as possible. The biblical Book of Esther and the narrative it describes are completely fictional. It is a work of the Hellenistic period, and like the Book of Daniel, fits into the literary genre of the ‘Hebrew novella’, i.e. it is a mini-novel. There is a strong scholarly consensus favoring a period of composition sometime in the 4th century BC, even including the early Hellenistic period following the 323 BC death of Alexander the Great in Babylon. Because of its theme of ethnic revenge through mass murder, Persian historian J. M. Cook has called the book of Esther a “racialistic perversion of Achaemenid history,” and as a reliable source of that history, writes: “the book of Esther has no historical value” (1). Mary Joan Winn Leith refers to the book of Esther as “a Hellenistic novel set in the Persian court” (2).

The name ‘Esther’ is either derived from the Persian word for star (aster), or may also be a form of ‘Ishtar’, the ancient goddess of love and war, and the Babylonian “Queen of Heaven,” which, for the biblical author’s symbolic purposes, is a name perfectly fitting the character and her role in his narrative.

Although the biblical book of Esther is a fictional literary work, it does weave several notable historical elements into the narrative in order to give it the illusion of being history – a technique employed by the authors of all good historical novels, where historical figures interact with fictional characters. One of these historical elements is the Persian king who is employed by the author to play the part of Esther’s husband in the tale. In Hebrew this monarch is called ‘Ahashverosh’, which in its Greek Septuagint form is ‘Ahasuerus’. In Persian history he was called ‘Khshayarshan’, but is better known to us by his 5th century BC Greek name – ‘Xerxes’, a king who ruled over the Persian Empire from 485 – 465 BC as the son and successor to King Darius I (521 – 486 BC).

Another historical character in this story is King Xerxes’ queen, named Vashti in the book of Esther (1:9), and known to the 5th century BC Greek historian Herodotus as Queen Amestris. She was the daughter of Otanes (Utana), the commander of the Persian army (7.61), (3) and was the sole wife and queen of Xerxes I. After the assassination of her husband in August 465 BC, she reigned as queen mother throughout the rule of her third and youngest son, Artaxerxes I (464 – 424/23 BC).

As reported by Herodotus, Queen Amestris had a revengeful nature and could be rather bloodthirsty at times in the conduct of her power. These characteristics—attributed to an historical personality in the reports of a contemporary Greek historian—seem to have been transferred, or projected, by the later biblical author, from the historically reported model onto the literary character of Queen Esther.

In this regard, Herodotus (7.114) heard that when Amestris was old, she had fourteen children of Persian nobility buried alive as a gift to the god who lives under the ground. In the Persika of Ctesias, the Persian general Megabyzus, son of Zopyrus (the most honoured Persian in the reign of Darius I), is said to have negotiated an armistice and clemency deal with Athens regarding its Greek prisoners of war taken by the Persian forces in Egypt, but the deal fell apart when Queen Amestris had all fifty Athenian prisoners put to death at her behest (4). Because of the gifting traditions of the Persian royal court, a Persian queen could often come to wield a degree of military power. Herodotus (9.109) speaks of queens of Persia being given command over their own personal military force as a traditional gift from the king.

From the very start of biblical composition in the 7th century BC, the Jews have plagiarized and liberally borrowed from the literary works of their “pagan” neighbors to cleverly construct a completely fictional fantasy history of their people and imaginary tribal god. The composition method of the Book of Esther is no different, and its author was clearly familiar with The Histories of Herodotus.

Esther 2:16 informs the reader that a woman of Judean Benjaminite descent, Hadassah/Esther, was eventually selected to replace Queen Vashti/Amestris, and was crowned Queen of the Persian Empire in Tebeth, the tenth month of the Hebrew calendar (corresponding to December-January), in Xerxes’ seventh regnal year (478 BC). Interestingly, this is the exact same year, as reported by Herodotus, in which Xerxes returns from his failed attempt to conquer Greece and ends up having an affair with his young and beautiful niece, which is subsequently discovered by his queen, who then launches a campaign of bloody revenge against the girl’s mother. It is the matching of these dates, and the mirrored symbolic similarity of the events, that form one of the reasons why it is thought that the author of Esther used the history reported by Herodotus as a model for his own reworked tale set in the time of this same king.

In the 8th chapter of Esther, the Persian king’s new Jewish vizier Mordecai does not simply rescind Haman’s orders to kill all the Jews—issued due to Mordecai disrespecting Haman’s royal office—and thus save his people in a peaceful manner, but instead, issues a grant of rights (in the name of Xerxes) to all the Jews of the Persian Empire to “defend” themselves on an appointed day (the 13th of Adar) by murdering any Gentile man, woman, or child they think “might” possibly attack them in the future, and to also plunder the property of the Gentiles whom they murder (Esther 8:11). The author of Esther tells the reader that this unprovoked, paranoiac mass murder resulted in the deaths of 75,810 Gentiles. This type of action is known as ‘pre-emptive genocidal murder and thievery based upon paranoiac delusions’ and, unfortunately, occupies the primordial, foundational strata of the Zionist psychology of the modern Israeli state, which sees the book of Esther as inspirational literature in all of its ramifications. In the third edition of The American Heritage Dictionary, ‘paranoia’ is defined as “a psychotic disorder characterized by delusions of persecution or grandeur.” A state of people believing themselves to be history’s number one ‘whipping boy’, as well as members of God’s favorite Iron Age tribal confederation, would certainly be a prime subject highly susceptible to such a collective paranoic psychosis.

Just as we are told in Esther 8:17 that various ethnic groups throughout the empire were seized with “fear of the Jews,” who were now armed for genocide with an official Persian royal decree of their own, so in Esther 9:3 it is stated that the provincial nobles, the satraps, the governors, and administrators of the Persian Empire were, at this time, seized with “fear of Mordecai.” Esther 8:17 also tells us that the eight-month-long, “fear of the power of Mordecai” period was a big season for Gentiles converting to Judaism, hoping, by conversion, that their families would not be murdered by “the Jews” and their property plundered.

However, there is no actual empirical historical evidence that the one hundred and twenty seven provinces of the Persian Empire were filled with blood-thirsty, Jew-hating Gentiles ready to go on a genocidal rampage at the behest of a Persian king or his grand vizier. On the contrary, this would seem to be a clear case of psychological “projection” on the part of the Jewish author of Esther. He is the one who actually wishes for the extermination of the Gentiles, i.e. 99.99% of the world, but cannot honestly psychologically face that about himself, so he “projects” that desire onto the Gentiles, thus turning them into murderous racists, and himself into an “eternally victimized innocent,” a position from which he can exploit others through the manipulation of their guilt, or murder them in cold blood under the delusions of his own paranoid mental state.

In empirical historical reality, there was no Benjaminite queen of the Persian Empire, no Mordecai, no murderous edict from the fictional, comic book-like character, the evil grand vizier, Haman, nor any mass slaying of Gentiles across the Persian Empire in 472 BC. It was merely the Jewish genocidal fantasy of the novella’s Hellenistic author, a genocidal fantasy and false history that has been passed down over the centuries as an important murderous and bloody part of plagiarized, falsified Jewish “history.”

In our modern times, Neuvo-Mordecai, also known by his adopted Hebrew name as Ben-yamin Netan-yahu, wants to causelessly attack the country of the people who liberated the Judahites from Babylonian captivity and provided them with two centuries of prosperity and goodwill during the Persian Period. In such cases, while it is sad, and while life tries to imitate art and imagination, hard-core historical reality will ultimately prevail over the mythic, with the members of all unreasonable houses punished mightily for their deep wickedness and folly.

REFERENCES
1. J. M. Cook, The Persians (London: Folio Society, 1983), 148, 215.
2. Mary Joan Winn Leith, “Israel Among the Nations: The Persian Period” in Michael D. Coogan (ed.), The Oxford History of the Biblical World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 368.
3. Robin Waterfield (trans.), Herodotus, The Histories (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 429.
4. Ctesias’ Persika cited in J. M. Cook, The Persians (London: Folio Society, 1983), 251.

@Noor
Hi Noor, sorry but it is English Sarcasm and Humour.
“the use of irony to mock or convey contempt.”
Of course it is Israel, that is what my comment conveyed.
The explosion is nonsense, they show a picture of two people and claim that they were the “Suicide” bombers. The pictures show them without bombs, why not set the bombs off when they are in the parking garage having left the bombs behind?
Fancy Cell phone fuses for a suicide bomb?
Why not use a piece of string?

Good old Robert Heinlein. :

“I grok people. I am people… so now I can say it in people talk. I’ve found out why people laugh. They laugh because it hurts so much… because it’s the only thing that’ll make it stop hurting.”

The Jews always hated us Catholics, they want us to die. Look what they did to Jesus, they just killed him, the bastards.